Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 54
54
References
1. Memorandum of Understanding on Interprovincial Heavy Vehicle 17. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, Canadian Standards Asso-
Weights and Dimensions, Roads and Transportation Association of ciation, CAN/CSA-S6-00, 2000.
Canada, Ottawa, February 1988. 18. Ervin, R. D. and Guy, Y., The Influence of Weights and Dimensions
2. The Golden Years of Trucking, Ontario Trucking Association, 1977. on the Stability and Control of Heavy Trucks in Canada--Part I,
3. Armstrong, M. D., Jung, F. W., and Phang, W. A., A Proposed CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical
Method of Regulating Vehicle Weights in Ontario, Ontario Depart- Report Volume 1, Roads and Transportation Association of
ment of Highways, Report RR 166, September 1970. Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
4. Tamberg, K. G., and Jung, F. W., Functional Relationships be- 19. Ervin, R. D. and Guy, Y., The Influence of Weights and Dimensions on
tween Actual Truck and AASHO Design Loadings for Simple Span the Stability and Control of Heavy Trucks in Canada--Part 2,
Bridges, Ontario Department of Highways, Report RR 129, Feb- CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical
ruary 1967. Report Volume 2, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada,
5. Jung, F. W., Simplified Design Live Load Patterns for Use in Control- Ottawa, July 1986.
ling Vehicle Weights on Bridges, Ontario Department of Highways, 20. Gagne, R. E., Graphic Representation of Heavy Vehicle Computer
Report RR 149, September 1969. Simulation Model Output: A 3-D Animation Package for Computer
6. Jung, F. W., and Witecki, A. A., Determining the Maximum Permis- Models, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study
sible Weights of Vehicles on Bridges, Ontario Department of Trans- Technical Report Volume 15, Roads and Transportation Associa-
portation and Communications, Report RR 175, 1971. tion of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
7. Agarwal, A. C. and Billing, J. R., The Effect of Ontario's Weight 21. Wong, J. Y. and El-Gindy, M., A Comparison of Various Computer
Regulations on Commercial Vehicle Design, Proceedings of Second Simulation Models for Predicting the Lateral Dynamic Behaviour of
International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimen- Articulated Vehicles, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen-
sions, Kelowna, British Columbia, June 1986. sions Study Technical Report Volume 16, Roads and Transporta-
8. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions--Bridge Capacity Study, Roads tion Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1980. 22. Billing, J. R., Demonstration Test Program: Summary of Tests of
9. Agarwal, A. C., Vehicle Weight Regulations across Canada: A Tech- Baseline Vehicle Performance, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and
nical Review with Respect to the Capacity of Highway Systems, On- Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 3, Roads and Trans-
tario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Report RR portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
214, April 1978. 23. Billing, J. R., Demonstration Test Program: Five, Six and Seven Axle
10. AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Ninth Edi- Tractor Semitrailers, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen-
tion, 1965, Twelfth Edition, Washington, D.C., 1977. sions Study Technical Report Volume 4, Roads and Transportation
11. Design of Highway Bridges, Canadian Standards Association, CAN/ Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
CSA-S6, published in 1922, 1929, 1938, 1952, 1966, 1974, 1978, and 24. Billing, J. R., Comparison of Simulation and Tests of Baseline and
1988. Tractor-Semitrailer Vehicles, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and
12. Highway Traffic Act, Ontario, http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/ Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 5, Roads and Trans-
statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm (As of December 30, portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
2008). 25. Billing, J. R., Hitch Slack and Drawbar Length Effects on C-train Sta-
13. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, First Edition, Ontario Min- bility and Handling, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen-
istry of Transportation, 1977. sions Study Technical Report Volume 6, Roads and Transportation
14. Agarwal, A. C., and Wolkowicz, M., Ontario Commercial Vehicle Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
Survey 1975, Interim Report, Ontario Ministry of Transportation 26. Delisle, G. and Pearson, J. R., Investigating Articulated Vehicle Roll
and Communications, 1976. Stability Using a Tilt Table Device, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights
15. Report of the Ontario Commission on Truck Safety, Ontario Ministry and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 7, Roads and
of Transportation, April 1983. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986.
16. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, Third Edition, Ontario Min- 27. Bedard, J., Vehicle Rollover Threshold Evaluation: An Assessment of
istry of Transportation, 1991. Computer Simulation Models, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and
OCR for page 55
55
Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 12, Roads and Trans- 44. Truck Size and Weight, Route Designations--Length, Width and
portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. Weight Limitations, 23 CFR 658.13, Government Printing Office,
28. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Heavy Vehicle Test Program-- Washington, D.C.
Part 1, Data Summary Report, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and 45. Billing, J. R., Lam, C. P., and Couture, J., Development of Regula-
Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 8, Roads and Trans- tory Principles for Multi-axle Semitrailers, Proceedings of Second
portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimen-
29. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Heavy Vehicle Test Program-- sions, Kelowna, British Columbia, June 1989.
Part 2, Load Equivalency Factors, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights 46. Corbin, G, Grandbois, J., and Richard, M. J., Evaluation of Self-
and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 9, Roads and steering Axles for Semitrailers, Proceedings of Fourth International
Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Ann
30. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Bump Induced Axle Loads: Arbor, Michigan, June 1995.
Experimental Findings, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Di- 47. Eastern Provinces Task Force on Harmonization of Vehicle
mensions Study Technical Report Volume 10, Roads and Trans- Weights and Dimensions Regulations, Status Report and Recom-
portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. mendations, Report to the Council of Deputy Ministers Responsi-
31. Woodrooffe, J. H. F., LeBlanc, P. A., and LePiane, K. R., The Effect ble for Transportation and Highway Safety. October 16, 1995.
of Suspension Variations on the Dynamic Wheel Loads of a Heavy 48. Nix, F. P. et al., Assessment of the Impact of Changes in Vehicle Con-
Articulated Vehicle, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen- figurations on Ontario's Industry, Report for Ontario Ministry of
sions Study Technical Report Volume 11, Roads and Transporta- Transportation, October 1996.
tion Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 49. Agarwal, A. C. et al., Impact on the Highway Infrastructure of Existing
32. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle and Alternative Vehicle Configurations and Weight Limits, Ontario
Weights and Dimensions, Kelowna, British Columbia., June 1986. Ministry of Transportation, May 1997.
33. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Steering Committee 50. Parker, S. P. S. and Amlin E., Western Log Truck Configurations
Report, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, Study, Transport Canada, Report TP13179E, 1998.
December 1986. 51. Parker, S. P. S., Amlin, E. J., and Hart, D. V., Steering Evaluations
34. Heavy Truck Weight and Dimension Limits for Interprovincial of a Tridem Drive Tractor in Combination with Pole Trailers, For-
Operations in Canada, Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimen- est Engineering Research Institute of Canada, Report, February
sions Policy, April 2008. http://www.comt.ca/english/programs/ 1998.
trucking/MOU%202008.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 52. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions--For Safe, Productive and Infra-
35. Good, D., Robinson, J. B. L., Sparks, G., and Neudorf, R., The Effect structure-friendly Vehicles, Ontario Regulation 413/05, http://www.
of Vehicle Length on Traffic on Canadian Two-lane, Two-way Roads, e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_050413_e.htm2005
Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1991. (As of December 30, 2008).
36. The Effect of Vehicle Length on Traffic on Canadian Two-lane, Two- 53. Billing, J. R. and Patten, J. D., Performance of Infrastructure-friendly
way Roads, Committee Report, Roads and Transportation Associ- Vehicles, National Research Council of Canada, Report CSTT-
ation of Canada, Ottawa, January 1992. HVC-TR-058, October 2003.
37. Guide to the Agreement on Uniform Vehicle Weights and Dimen- 54. Billing, J. R. and Patten, J. D., Full-scale Performance Testing of
sions Limits in Atlantic Canada, Task Force on Vehicle Weights 5-axle Semitrailers, National Research Council of Canada, Report
and Dimensions Policy, October 2001, http://www.comt.ca/english/ CSTT-HVC-TR-084, December 2004.
programs/trucking/Guide.PDF (As of December 30, 2008). 55. Transportation Partnership Program, Saskatchewan Highways and
38. Issuance of Special Permits for Tractors with a Wheelbase Greater Infrastructure, http://www.highways.gov.sk.ca/trucking-programs/
than 6.2 Metres, http://www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/portal/page/portal/ (As of December 30, 2008).
Librairie/Publications/en/camionnage/info_camionnage/040422_ 56. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway
en.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). Safety, http://www.comt.ca/ (As of December 30, 2008).
39. Bowland J. M., Eckler H. J., Friend R. G., McKnight D. A., and Toms 57. Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), http://www.tac-
D. B., Economic Impact of Introducing 53 ft Semi-Trailers and 25 Metre atc.ca/english/index.cfm (As of December 30, 2008).
B-Trains in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 1993. 58. Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators (CCMTA),
40. Billing, J. R., and Lam C. P., Development of Regulatory Principles http://www.ccmta.ca/ (As of December 30, 2008).
for Straight Trucks and Truck-trailer Combinations, Proceedings 59. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway
of Third International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Safety, National Highway Policy, http://www.comt.ca/english/nhp-
Dimensions, Cambridge, England, June 1992. e.htm (As of December 30, 2008).
41. Woodrooffe, J. H. F., LeBlanc, P. A., and El-Gindy, M., Technical 60. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway
Analysis and Recommended Practice for the Double Drawbar Dolly Safety, National Highway System Review, http://www.comt.ca/
Using Self-steering Axles, Roads and Transportation Association of english/news-22-05.htm (As of December 30, 2008).
Canada, Ottawa, 1986. 61. Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy, http://
42. C-dolly Specifications, Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 903, www.comt.ca/english/programs/trucking/index.html (As of De-
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowDoc/cr/C.R.C.-c.1038/sc:4::sc:5//en? cember 30, 2008).
page=11&isPrinting=false#codesc:4-se:903, (As of December 30, 62. Economics of Truck Sizes and Weights in Canada, IBI Group and ADI
2008). Ltd., Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa,
43. C-dolly Hitch Requirements, Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Stan- May 1987.
dard 904, http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowDoc/cr/C.R.C.-c.1038/ 63. Impacts of Canada's Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Re-
sc:4::sc:5//en?page=11&isPrinting=false#codesc:4-se:904, (As of search and Interprovincial Agreement, IBI Group and ADI Ltd.,
December 30, 2008). Canadian Trucking Research Institute, October 1994.
OCR for page 56
56
64. Nix F. P., Clayton A. M., Bisson B. G., and Sparks G. A., Study of 80. National Bridge Inventory, Federal Highways Administration,
Vehicle Weight and Dimension Regulations and Canada's Trucking http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm (As of December 30, 2008).
Industry, Transport Canada, Report TP 8480E, April 1987. 81. Schulman J. E., Heavy Truck Weights and Dimension Limits in
65. 1999 National Roadside Study, Canadian Council of Motor Trans- Canada, Railway Association of Canada, Ottawa, 2003, http://
port Administrators, 2001. www.railcan.ca/documents/publications/2003_09_23_heavyTruck
66. An Overview of PerformanceBased Standards Regulatory and Com- WxD_en.pdf (As of December 30, 2008).
pliance Processes, National Road Transport Commission, Mel- 82. Truck Size and Weight Limits, The Association of American Railroads,
bourne, Australia, February 2002. http://www.aar.org/GovernmentAffairs//media/AAR/Position-
67. Special Report 227: New Trucks for Greater Productivity and Less Papers/281.ashx (As of December 30, 2008).
Road Wear: An Evaluation of the Turner Proposal, TRB, National 83. Static Roll Thresholds, Land Transport Safety Authority, Welling-
Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990. ton, New Zealand, Factsheet 13e, August 2003, http://www.ltsa.
68. United States Department of Transportation, Comprehensive Truck govt.nz/factsheets/13e.html (As of December 30, 2008).
Size and Weight Study. Washington, D.C., 2000. 84. Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Tank Vehicles of Cat-
69. Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of egories N and O with Regard to Rollover Stability, Regulation No. 111
Commercial Motor Vehicles, Transportation Research Board of the under the Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Tech-
National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. nical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts
70. Western Uniformity Scenario Analysis, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the
policy/otps/truck/wusr/wusr.pdf, (As of December 30, 2008). Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the
71. SAFETEA-LU, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/index.htm, (As Basis of These Prescriptions, United Nations Economic Commission
of December 30, 2008). for Europe, December 2000.
72. Title 23, Highways, http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c= 85. Billing J. R., and Patten J. D., A Discussion of the High-Speed Offtrack-
ecfr;sid=2bf79a551f804adc980bb542fe7fbf98;rgn=div5;view=text; ing Performance Standard, Proceedings of Tenth International Sym-
node=23%3A1.0.1.7.34;idno=23;cc=ecfr#23:1.0.1.7.34.0.1.10, (As posium on Heavy Vehicle Transport Technology, Paris, June 2008.
of December 30, 2008). 86. Minutes of Special Meeting, TRB Committee AT055 Motor Vehi-
73. United States Department of Transportation, http://vsw.fhwa.dot. cle Size and Weight, Washington, D.C., January 2008.
gov/qa/qa.jsp?category=23%20CFR%20658.23#S0-149, (As of 87. Regehr J. D., Montufar J., and Rempel G., "Safety Performance of
December 30, 2008). Longer Combination Vehicles Relative to Other Articulated Trucks"
74. Special Report 211: Twin Trailer Trucks, TRB, National Research Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 36, 2009, pp 4049.
Council, Washington, D.C., 1986. 88. Regehr J. D., Montufar J., and Clayton A, "Lessons Learned about
75. U.S. Congress. House, Interstate Commerce Commission. Federal the Impacts of Size and Weight Regulations on the Articulated
Regulation of the Sizes and Weight of Motor Vehicles. House Docu- Truck Fleet in the Canadian Prairie Region" Canadian Journal of
ment 354, 77th Congress, 1st Session, Aug. 14, 1941. Civil Engineering, Vol 36, 2009, pp 607616.
76. Western Regional Permitting, Texas Department of Transportation, 89. Woodrooffe, J., "Long Combination Vehicle (LCV) Safety Perfor-
ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/mcd/pdf/washto.pdf (As of mance in Alberta 1995 to 1998." Alberta Transportation, Edmon-
December 30, 2008). ton, Alberta, 2001.
77. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Truck Size 90. Woodrooffe, J., Anderson, D., and Ash, L., "The Influence of Policy
and Weight Policy: Looking Beyond the Comprehensive Truck Size on Crash Rates of Long Combination Vehicles," Eighth Interna-
and Weight Study, Workshop Proceedings, Irvine, CA, 2000. tional Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights & Dimensions Johan-
78. The American Road and Transportation Builders Association, A nesburg South Africa, March 1418, 2004.
New Vision and Mission for America's Federal Surface Transportation 91. Woodrooffe J., Glaeser K. P., and Nordengen P., "Truck Produc-
Program, Executive Summary, http://www.artba.org/pdf/SAFETEA- tivity, Efficiency and CO2 OutputInternational Performance
LU_Recommendations_1107.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). Benchmarking," In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the
79. Massicotte, B., and Picard A., Development of a Loading Model Transportation Research Board, No. 2162, Transportation Re-
Adapted to Trucks on Québec Roads, Proceedings of Developments in search Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010,
Short and Medium Span Bridge Engineering, Toronto, August 1990. pp. 6372.
