National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 4 - Conclusions
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14458.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14458.
×
Page 55
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14458.
×
Page 56

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

1. Memorandum of Understanding on Interprovincial Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, February 1988. 2. The Golden Years of Trucking, Ontario Trucking Association, 1977. 3. Armstrong, M. D., Jung, F. W., and Phang, W. A., A Proposed Method of Regulating Vehicle Weights in Ontario, Ontario Depart- ment of Highways, Report RR 166, September 1970. 4. Tamberg, K. G., and Jung, F. W., Functional Relationships be- tween Actual Truck and AASHO Design Loadings for Simple Span Bridges, Ontario Department of Highways, Report RR 129, Feb- ruary 1967. 5. Jung, F. W., Simplified Design Live Load Patterns for Use in Control- ling Vehicle Weights on Bridges, Ontario Department of Highways, Report RR 149, September 1969. 6. Jung, F. W., and Witecki, A. A., Determining the Maximum Permis- sible Weights of Vehicles on Bridges, Ontario Department of Trans- portation and Communications, Report RR 175, 1971. 7. Agarwal, A. C. and Billing, J. R., The Effect of Ontario’s Weight Regulations on Commercial Vehicle Design, Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions, Kelowna, British Columbia, June 1986. 8. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions—Bridge Capacity Study, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1980. 9. Agarwal, A. C., Vehicle Weight Regulations across Canada: A Tech- nical Review with Respect to the Capacity of Highway Systems, On- tario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Report RR 214, April 1978. 10. AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Ninth Edi- tion, 1965, Twelfth Edition, Washington, D.C., 1977. 11. Design of Highway Bridges, Canadian Standards Association, CAN/ CSA-S6, published in 1922, 1929, 1938, 1952, 1966, 1974, 1978, and 1988. 12. Highway Traffic Act, Ontario, http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/ statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h08_e.htm (As of December 30, 2008). 13. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, First Edition, Ontario Min- istry of Transportation, 1977. 14. Agarwal, A. C., and Wolkowicz, M., Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey 1975, Interim Report, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, 1976. 15. Report of the Ontario Commission on Truck Safety, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, April 1983. 16. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, Third Edition, Ontario Min- istry of Transportation, 1991. 17. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, Canadian Standards Asso- ciation, CAN/CSA-S6-00, 2000. 18. Ervin, R. D. and Guy, Y., The Influence of Weights and Dimensions on the Stability and Control of Heavy Trucks in Canada—Part I, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 1, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 19. Ervin, R. D. and Guy, Y., The Influence of Weights and Dimensions on the Stability and Control of Heavy Trucks in Canada—Part 2, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 2, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 20. Gagne, R. E., Graphic Representation of Heavy Vehicle Computer Simulation Model Output: A 3-D Animation Package for Computer Models, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 15, Roads and Transportation Associa- tion of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 21. Wong, J. Y. and El-Gindy, M., A Comparison of Various Computer Simulation Models for Predicting the Lateral Dynamic Behaviour of Articulated Vehicles, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Study Technical Report Volume 16, Roads and Transporta- tion Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 22. Billing, J. R., Demonstration Test Program: Summary of Tests of Baseline Vehicle Performance, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 3, Roads and Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 23. Billing, J. R., Demonstration Test Program: Five, Six and Seven Axle Tractor Semitrailers, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Study Technical Report Volume 4, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 24. Billing, J. R., Comparison of Simulation and Tests of Baseline and Tractor-Semitrailer Vehicles, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 5, Roads and Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 25. Billing, J. R., Hitch Slack and Drawbar Length Effects on C-train Sta- bility and Handling, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Study Technical Report Volume 6, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 26. Delisle, G. and Pearson, J. R., Investigating Articulated Vehicle Roll Stability Using a Tilt Table Device, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 7, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 27. Bedard, J., Vehicle Rollover Threshold Evaluation: An Assessment of Computer Simulation Models, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and References 54

Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 12, Roads and Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 28. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Heavy Vehicle Test Program— Part 1, Data Summary Report, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 8, Roads and Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 29. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Heavy Vehicle Test Program— Part 2, Load Equivalency Factors, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Report Volume 9, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 30. Christison, J. T., Pavements Response to Bump Induced Axle Loads: Experimental Findings, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Di- mensions Study Technical Report Volume 10, Roads and Trans- portation Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 31. Woodrooffe, J. H. F., LeBlanc, P. A., and LePiane, K. R., The Effect of Suspension Variations on the Dynamic Wheel Loads of a Heavy Articulated Vehicle, CCMTA/RTAC Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Study Technical Report Volume 11, Roads and Transporta- tion Association of Canada, Ottawa, July 1986. 32. Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Kelowna, British Columbia., June 1986. 33. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Study Technical Steering Committee Report, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, December 1986. 34. Heavy Truck Weight and Dimension Limits for Interprovincial Operations in Canada, Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Policy, April 2008. http://www.comt.ca/english/programs/ trucking/MOU%202008.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 35. Good, D., Robinson, J. B. L., Sparks, G., and Neudorf, R., The Effect of Vehicle Length on Traffic on Canadian Two-lane, Two-way Roads, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1991. 36. The Effect of Vehicle Length on Traffic on Canadian Two-lane, Two- way Roads, Committee Report, Roads and Transportation Associ- ation of Canada, Ottawa, January 1992. 37. Guide to the Agreement on Uniform Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions Limits in Atlantic Canada, Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy, October 2001, http://www.comt.ca/english/ programs/trucking/Guide.PDF (As of December 30, 2008). 38. Issuance of Special Permits for Tractors with a Wheelbase Greater than 6.2 Metres, http://www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/portal/page/portal/ Librairie/Publications/en/camionnage/info_camionnage/040422_ en.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 39. Bowland J. M., Eckler H. J., Friend R. G., McKnight D. A., and Toms D. B., Economic Impact of Introducing 53 ft Semi-Trailers and 25 Metre B-Trains in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, 1993. 40. Billing, J. R., and Lam C. P., Development of Regulatory Principles for Straight Trucks and Truck-trailer Combinations, Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Cambridge, England, June 1992. 41. Woodrooffe, J. H. F., LeBlanc, P. A., and El-Gindy, M., Technical Analysis and Recommended Practice for the Double Drawbar Dolly Using Self-steering Axles, Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, 1986. 42. C-dolly Specifications, Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 903, http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowDoc/cr/C.R.C.-c.1038/sc:4::sc:5//en? page=11&isPrinting=false#codesc:4-se:903, (As of December 30, 2008). 43. C-dolly Hitch Requirements, Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Stan- dard 904, http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/ShowDoc/cr/C.R.C.-c.1038/ sc:4::sc:5//en?page=11&isPrinting=false#codesc:4-se:904, (As of December 30, 2008). 44. Truck Size and Weight, Route Designations—Length, Width and Weight Limitations, 23 CFR 658.13, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 45. Billing, J. R., Lam, C. P., and Couture, J., Development of Regula- tory Principles for Multi-axle Semitrailers, Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimen- sions, Kelowna, British Columbia, June 1989. 46. Corbin, G, Grandbois, J., and Richard, M. J., Evaluation of Self- steering Axles for Semitrailers, Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 1995. 47. Eastern Provinces Task Force on Harmonization of Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Regulations, Status Report and Recom- mendations, Report to the Council of Deputy Ministers Responsi- ble for Transportation and Highway Safety. October 16, 1995. 48. Nix, F. P. et al., Assessment of the Impact of Changes in Vehicle Con- figurations on Ontario’s Industry, Report for Ontario Ministry of Transportation, October 1996. 49. Agarwal, A. C. et al., Impact on the Highway Infrastructure of Existing and Alternative Vehicle Configurations and Weight Limits, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, May 1997. 50. Parker, S. P. S. and Amlin E., Western Log Truck Configurations Study, Transport Canada, Report TP13179E, 1998. 51. Parker, S. P. S., Amlin, E. J., and Hart, D. V., Steering Evaluations of a Tridem Drive Tractor in Combination with Pole Trailers, For- est Engineering Research Institute of Canada, Report, February 1998. 52. Vehicle Weights and Dimensions—For Safe, Productive and Infra- structure-friendly Vehicles, Ontario Regulation 413/05, http://www. e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_050413_e.htm2005 (As of December 30, 2008). 53. Billing, J. R. and Patten, J. D., Performance of Infrastructure-friendly Vehicles, National Research Council of Canada, Report CSTT- HVC-TR-058, October 2003. 54. Billing, J. R. and Patten, J. D., Full-scale Performance Testing of 5-axle Semitrailers, National Research Council of Canada, Report CSTT-HVC-TR-084, December 2004. 55. Transportation Partnership Program, Saskatchewan Highways and Infrastructure, http://www.highways.gov.sk.ca/trucking-programs/ (As of December 30, 2008). 56. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety, http://www.comt.ca/ (As of December 30, 2008). 57. Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), http://www.tac- atc.ca/english/index.cfm (As of December 30, 2008). 58. Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators (CCMTA), http://www.ccmta.ca/ (As of December 30, 2008). 59. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety, National Highway Policy, http://www.comt.ca/english/nhp- e.htm (As of December 30, 2008). 60. Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety, National Highway System Review, http://www.comt.ca/ english/news-22-05.htm (As of December 30, 2008). 61. Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy, http:// www.comt.ca/english/programs/trucking/index.html (As of De- cember 30, 2008). 62. Economics of Truck Sizes and Weights in Canada, IBI Group and ADI Ltd., Roads and Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, May 1987. 63. Impacts of Canada’s Heavy Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Re- search and Interprovincial Agreement, IBI Group and ADI Ltd., Canadian Trucking Research Institute, October 1994. 55

64. Nix F. P., Clayton A. M., Bisson B. G., and Sparks G. A., Study of Vehicle Weight and Dimension Regulations and Canada’s Trucking Industry, Transport Canada, Report TP 8480E, April 1987. 65. 1999 National Roadside Study, Canadian Council of Motor Trans- port Administrators, 2001. 66. An Overview of Performance–Based Standards Regulatory and Com- pliance Processes, National Road Transport Commission, Mel- bourne, Australia, February 2002. 67. Special Report 227: New Trucks for Greater Productivity and Less Road Wear: An Evaluation of the Turner Proposal, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990. 68. United States Department of Transportation, Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study. Washington, D.C., 2000. 69. Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. 70. Western Uniformity Scenario Analysis, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ policy/otps/truck/wusr/wusr.pdf, (As of December 30, 2008). 71. SAFETEA-LU, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/index.htm, (As of December 30, 2008). 72. Title 23, Highways, http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c= ecfr;sid=2bf79a551f804adc980bb542fe7fbf98;rgn=div5;view=text; node=23%3A1.0.1.7.34;idno=23;cc=ecfr#23:1.0.1.7.34.0.1.10, (As of December 30, 2008). 73. United States Department of Transportation, http://vsw.fhwa.dot. gov/qa/qa.jsp?category=23%20CFR%20658.23#S0-149, (As of December 30, 2008). 74. Special Report 211: Twin Trailer Trucks, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986. 75. U.S. Congress. House, Interstate Commerce Commission. Federal Regulation of the Sizes and Weight of Motor Vehicles. House Docu- ment 354, 77th Congress, 1st Session, Aug. 14, 1941. 76. Western Regional Permitting, Texas Department of Transportation, ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/mcd/pdf/washto.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 77. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Truck Size and Weight Policy: Looking Beyond the Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, Workshop Proceedings, Irvine, CA, 2000. 78. The American Road and Transportation Builders Association, A New Vision and Mission for America’s Federal Surface Transportation Program, Executive Summary, http://www.artba.org/pdf/SAFETEA- LU_Recommendations_1107.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 79. Massicotte, B., and Picard A., Development of a Loading Model Adapted to Trucks on Québec Roads, Proceedings of Developments in Short and Medium Span Bridge Engineering, Toronto, August 1990. 80. National Bridge Inventory, Federal Highways Administration, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm (As of December 30, 2008). 81. Schulman J. E., Heavy Truck Weights and Dimension Limits in Canada, Railway Association of Canada, Ottawa, 2003, http:// www.railcan.ca/documents/publications/2003_09_23_heavyTruck WxD_en.pdf (As of December 30, 2008). 82. Truck Size and Weight Limits, The Association of American Railroads, http://www.aar.org/GovernmentAffairs/∼/media/AAR/Position- Papers/281.ashx (As of December 30, 2008). 83. Static Roll Thresholds, Land Transport Safety Authority, Welling- ton, New Zealand, Factsheet 13e, August 2003, http://www.ltsa. govt.nz/factsheets/13e.html (As of December 30, 2008). 84. Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Tank Vehicles of Cat- egories N and O with Regard to Rollover Stability, Regulation No. 111 under the Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Tech- nical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of These Prescriptions, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, December 2000. 85. Billing J. R., and Patten J. D., A Discussion of the High-Speed Offtrack- ing Performance Standard, Proceedings of Tenth International Sym- posium on Heavy Vehicle Transport Technology, Paris, June 2008. 86. Minutes of Special Meeting, TRB Committee AT055 Motor Vehi- cle Size and Weight, Washington, D.C., January 2008. 87. Regehr J. D., Montufar J., and Rempel G., “Safety Performance of Longer Combination Vehicles Relative to Other Articulated Trucks” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 36, 2009, pp 40–49. 88. Regehr J. D., Montufar J., and Clayton A, “Lessons Learned about the Impacts of Size and Weight Regulations on the Articulated Truck Fleet in the Canadian Prairie Region” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol 36, 2009, pp 607–616. 89. Woodrooffe, J., “Long Combination Vehicle (LCV) Safety Perfor- mance in Alberta 1995 to 1998.” Alberta Transportation, Edmon- ton, Alberta, 2001. 90. Woodrooffe, J., Anderson, D., and Ash, L., “The Influence of Policy on Crash Rates of Long Combination Vehicles,” Eighth Interna- tional Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weights & Dimensions Johan- nesburg South Africa, March 14–18, 2004. 91. Woodrooffe J., Glaeser K. P., and Nordengen P., “Truck Produc- tivity, Efficiency and CO2 Output–International Performance Benchmarking,” In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2162, Transportation Re- search Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 63–72. 56

Next: List of Abbreviations »
Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 671: Review of Canadian Experience with the Regulation of Large Commercial Motor Vehicles examines the process used in Canada to harmonize heavy truck size and weight regulations across the country. The report provides insights on how lessons learned from the Canadian experience might be applied in the United States.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!