Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 101
102 APPENDIX B Specification Content Analysis This appendix contains the details of the content analysis of agencies that had specifications that were specifically identifiable as microsurfacing. Table B1 lists the agencies whose specifications were reviewed. Table B2 is the output from that analysis. TABLE B1 AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY Agency Specification Title Date Remarks Alabama Paver-Laid Surface Treatment 2009 Microsurfacing included under this section title FHWA EFLHD Slurry Seal 2003 Microsurfacing included under this section title Georgia Microsurfacing 2001 Kansas Microsurfacing 2008 Louisiana Microsurfacing 2005 Michigan Microsurfacing 2003 Minnesota Microsurfacing 2009 Missouri Microsurfacing 2004 Nebraska Microsurfacing 2007 New Mexico Microsurfacing 2008 Ohio Microsurfacing 2010 Oklahoma Microsurfacing 1999 Pennsylvania Cold-Laid Latex-Modified 2010 Microsurfacing included under this section Emulsion Pavement Course title Tennessee Microsurfacing 2006 Texas Microsurfacing 2004 Utah Microsurfacing 2008 Virginia Latex-Modified Emulsion 1996 Treatment (microsurfacing) Wyoming Microsurfacing 2004
OCR for page 102
103 TABLE B2 AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS Residual Mineral Asphalt Filler Latex Aggre- QC Type Cali- Agency Binder (%) (%) (%) gate Sample Mixer Control bration Rollers Alabama CQS- 6.07.5 1.02.0 3.0 TII P CSP C NS S 1hp FHWA CQS- 5.510.5 0.03.0 3.0 TIII S CSP C C N 1h Georgia CQS- 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TIII P CSP C S N 1hp Kansas CSS- 6.5 1.03.0 NS O NS CSP NS NS N 1hm Louisiana CSS-1h 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 O P CSP C C P Michigan CSS- 7.08.5 0.253.0 NS O P CSP C NS N 1hm Minnesota CSS-1h 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TII P CSP C C N Missouri CSS-1h 5.510.5 0.03.0 3.0 TIII CSP C C N Nebraska CSS-1h 6.011.0 0.53.0 NS O P CSP C S N New Mexico CSS-1P 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C N Ohio CSS-1h 7.08.5 0.253.0 NS TIII NS CSP MC C P Oklahoma CSS-1h 6.09.0 1.03.0 NS O PS CSP C S N Pennsylvania CSS 6.07.5 1.02.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C P 1h Tennessee 5.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 O P CSP C S N Texas CSS-1p 6.09.0 0.53.0 NS O NS CSP C S N Utah 5.59.0 NS 2.5 TIII P CSP MC S N Virginia CSS-1h 6.58.5 0.253.0 3.0 O P CSP MC C P Wyoming CQS- NS NS NS TIII P CSP C S N 1hp Agency Tack Rut Compac- Test Air Surface Coat filling tion Strip Temps Temps Alabama Y 1/2 P 500 50 NS FHWA N ND T12 N 45 45 Georgia Y 1/2 NS N 50 50 Kansas N 1/2 NS N 60 60 Louisiana Y 1/2 T24 1000 70 50 Michigan N ND NS N 45 45 Minnesota Y 1/2 T24 1000 50 50 Missouri Y ND T12 500 50 50 Nebraska N 1.0 NS N 50 50 New Mexico N ND NS N 50 NS Ohio Y ND T 1000 50 40 Oklahoma N ND NS TN 50 50 Pennsylvania N 1/2 P 500 50 NS Tennessee Y ND T24 N 50 50 Texas N 1/2 T N 50 50 Utah N ND NS 500 50 50 Virginia N 1/4 Y N 50 50 Wyoming N 3/8 NS TN 60 60 (continued on next page)
OCR for page 103
104 TABLE B2 (continued) Testing AL FH GA KS LA MI MN MO NE NM OH OK PA TN TX UT VA WY Req'ts Residual Asphalt X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Content Pene- X X X X X X X X tration Softening X X X X X X X X Point Sand X X X X X X X X X X X X Equivalent Soundness X X X X X Abrasion X X X X X X Resistance Wet X X X X X X X X X X Stripping Clay X X % Sodium Sulfate X X X X Loss Consist- X ency Modified X X X X X X Cohesion Loaded X X X X X X X Wheel Wet-Track X X X X X X X X X X X Abrasion Set Time X X X X Cure Time X X X X Lateral Displace- X X X X X ment Class- X X X X X X X X ification Mix Time X X X X X X X X X TTI X Mixing Compa- X X X tibility