Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 101
102
APPENDIX B
Specification Content Analysis
This appendix contains the details of the content analysis of agencies that had specifications that were specifically
identifiable as microsurfacing. Table B1 lists the agencies whose specifications were reviewed. Table B2 is the output from
that analysis.
TABLE B1
AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY
Agency Specification Title Date Remarks
Alabama Paver-Laid Surface Treatment 2009 Microsurfacing included under this section
title
FHWA EFLHD Slurry Seal 2003 Microsurfacing included under this section
title
Georgia Microsurfacing 2001
Kansas Microsurfacing 2008
Louisiana Microsurfacing 2005
Michigan Microsurfacing 2003
Minnesota Microsurfacing 2009
Missouri Microsurfacing 2004
Nebraska Microsurfacing 2007
New Mexico Microsurfacing 2008
Ohio Microsurfacing 2010
Oklahoma Microsurfacing 1999
Pennsylvania Cold-Laid Latex-Modified 2010 Microsurfacing included under this section
Emulsion Pavement Course title
Tennessee Microsurfacing 2006
Texas Microsurfacing 2004
Utah Microsurfacing 2008
Virginia Latex-Modified Emulsion 1996
Treatment (microsurfacing)
Wyoming Microsurfacing 2004
OCR for page 102
103
TABLE B2
AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS
Residual Mineral
Asphalt Filler Latex Aggre- QC Type Cali-
Agency Binder (%) (%) (%) gate Sample Mixer Control bration Rollers
Alabama CQS- 6.07.5 1.02.0 3.0 TII P CSP C NS S
1hp
FHWA CQS- 5.510.5 0.03.0 3.0 TIII S CSP C C N
1h
Georgia CQS- 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TIII P CSP C S N
1hp
Kansas CSS- 6.5 1.03.0 NS O NS CSP NS NS N
1hm
Louisiana CSS-1h 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 O P CSP C C P
Michigan CSS- 7.08.5 0.253.0 NS O P CSP C NS N
1hm
Minnesota CSS-1h 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TII P CSP C C N
Missouri CSS-1h 5.510.5 0.03.0 3.0 TIII CSP C C N
Nebraska CSS-1h 6.011.0 0.53.0 NS O P CSP C S N
New Mexico CSS-1P 6.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C N
Ohio CSS-1h 7.08.5 0.253.0 NS TIII NS CSP MC C P
Oklahoma CSS-1h 6.09.0 1.03.0 NS O PS CSP C S N
Pennsylvania CSS 6.07.5 1.02.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C P
1h
Tennessee 5.09.0 0.53.0 3.0 O P CSP C S N
Texas CSS-1p 6.09.0 0.53.0 NS O NS CSP C S N
Utah 5.59.0 NS 2.5 TIII P CSP MC S N
Virginia CSS-1h 6.58.5 0.253.0 3.0 O P CSP MC C P
Wyoming CQS- NS NS NS TIII P CSP C S N
1hp
Agency Tack Rut Compac- Test Air Surface
Coat filling tion Strip Temps Temps
Alabama Y 1/2 P 500 50 NS
FHWA N ND T12 N 45 45
Georgia Y 1/2 NS N 50 50
Kansas N 1/2 NS N 60 60
Louisiana Y 1/2 T24 1000 70 50
Michigan N ND NS N 45 45
Minnesota Y 1/2 T24 1000 50 50
Missouri Y ND T12 500 50 50
Nebraska N 1.0 NS N 50 50
New Mexico N ND NS N 50 NS
Ohio Y ND T 1000 50 40
Oklahoma N ND NS TN 50 50
Pennsylvania N 1/2 P 500 50 NS
Tennessee Y ND T24 N 50 50
Texas N 1/2 T N 50 50
Utah N ND NS 500 50 50
Virginia N 1/4 Y N 50 50
Wyoming N 3/8 NS TN 60 60
(continued on next page)
OCR for page 103
104
TABLE B2
(continued)
Testing
AL FH GA KS LA MI MN MO NE NM OH OK PA TN TX UT VA WY
Req'ts
Residual
Asphalt X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Content
Pene-
X X X X X X X X
tration
Softening
X X X X X X X X
Point
Sand
X X X X X X X X X X X X
Equivalent
Soundness X X X X X
Abrasion
X X X X X X
Resistance
Wet
X X X X X X X X X X
Stripping
Clay X X
% Sodium
Sulfate X X X X
Loss
Consist-
X
ency
Modified
X X X X X X
Cohesion
Loaded
X X X X X X X
Wheel
Wet-Track
X X X X X X X X X X X
Abrasion
Set Time X X X X
Cure Time X X X X
Lateral
Displace- X X X X X
ment
Class-
X X X X X X X X
ification
Mix Time X X X X X X X X X
TTI
X
Mixing
Compa-
X X X
tibility