Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Agency Specification Title Date Remarks Alabama Paver-Laid Surface Treatment 2009 Microsurfacing included under this section title FHWA EFLHD Slurry Seal 2003 Microsurfacing included under this section title Georgia Microsurfacing 2001 Kansas Microsurfacing 2008 Louisiana Microsurfacing 2005 Michigan Microsurfacing 2003 Minnesota Microsurfacing 2009 Missouri Microsurfacing 2004 Nebraska Microsurfacing 2007 New Mexico Microsurfacing 2008 Ohio Microsurfacing 2010 Oklahoma Microsurfacing 1999 Pennsylvania Cold-Laid Latex-Modified Emulsion Pavement Course 2010 Microsurfacing included under this section title Tennessee Microsurfacing 2006 Texas Microsurfacing 2004 Utah Microsurfacing 2008 Virginia Latex-Modified Emulsion Treatment (microsurfacing) 1996 Wyoming Microsurfacing 2004 102 APPENDIX B Specification Content Analysis This appendix contains the details of the content analysis of agencies that had specifications that were specifically identifiable as microsurfacing. Table B1 lists the agencies whose specifications were reviewed. Table B2 is the output from that analysis. TABLE B1 AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS SUMMARY
103 Agency Binder Residual Asphalt (%) Mineral Filler (%) Latex (%) Aggre- gate QC Sample Type Mixer Control Cali- bration Rollers Alabama CQS- 1hp 6.0â7.5 1.0â2.0 3.0 TII P CSP C NS S FHWA CQS- 1h 5.5â10.5 0.0â3.0 3.0 TIII S CSP C C N Georgia CQS- 1hp 6.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 3.0 TIII P CSP C S N Kansas CSS- 1hm 6.5 1.0â3.0 NS O NS CSP NS NS N Louisiana CSS-1h 6.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 3.0 O P CSP C C P Michigan CSS- 1hm 7.0â8.5 0.25â3.0 NS O P CSP C NS N Minnesota CSS-1h 6.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 3.0 TII P CSP C C N Missouri CSS-1h 5.5â10.5 0.0â3.0 3.0 TIII CSP C C N Nebraska CSS-1h 6.0â11.0 0.5â3.0 NS O P CSP C S N New Mexico CSS-1P 6.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C N Ohio CSS-1h 7.0â8.5 0.25â3.0 NS TIII NS CSP MC C P Oklahoma CSS-1h 6.0â9.0 1.0â3.0 NS O PS CSP C S N Pennsylvania CSSâ 1h 6.0â7.5 1.0â2.0 3.0 TII S CSP C C P Tennessee 5.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 3.0 O P CSP C S N Texas CSS-1p 6.0â9.0 0.5â3.0 NS O NS CSP C S N Utah 5.5â9.0 NS 2.5 TIII P CSP MC S N Virginia CSS-1h 6.5â8.5 0.25â3.0 3.0 O P CSP MC C P Wyoming CQS- 1hp NS NS NS TIII P CSP C S N Agency Tack Coat Rut filling Compac- tion Test Strip Air Temps Surface Temps Alabama Y 1/2 P 500 50 NS FHWA N ND T12 N 45 45 Georgia Y 1/2 NS N 50 50 Kansas N 1/2 NS N 60 60 Louisiana Y 1/2 T24 1000 70 50 Michigan N ND NS N 45 45 Minnesota Y 1/2 T24 1000 50 50 Missouri Y ND T12 500 50 50 Nebraska N 1.0 NS N 50 50 New Mexico N ND NS N 50 NS Ohio Y ND T 1000 50 40 Oklahoma N ND NS TN 50 50 Pennsylvania N 1/2 P 500 50 NS Tennessee Y ND T24 N 50 50 Texas N 1/2 T N 50 50 Utah N ND NS 500 50 50 Virginia N 1/4 Y N 50 50 Wyoming N 3/8 NS TN 60 60 (continued on next page) TABLE B2 AGENCY MICROSURFACING SPECIFICATION CONTENT ANALYSIS
104 TABLE B2 (continued) Testing Reqâts AL FH GA KS LA MI MN MO NE NM OH OK PA TN TX UT VA WY Residual Asphalt Content X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Pene- tration X X X X X X X X Softening Point X X X X X X X X Sand Equivalent X X X X X X X X X X X X Soundness X X X X X Abrasion Resistance X X X X X X Wet Stripping X X X X X X X X X X Clay X X % Sodium Sulfate Loss X X X X Consist- ency X Modified Cohesion X X X X X X Loaded Wheel X X X X X X X Wet-Track Abrasion X X X X X X X X X X X Set Time X X X X Cure Time X X X X Lateral Displace- ment X X X X X Class- ification X X X X X X X X Mix Time X X X X X X X X X TTI Mixing X Compa- tibility X X X