Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 55
56 CHAPTER EIGHT CASE STUDIES INTRODUCTION interpretation of the information contained in the literature. Each case will be briefly described and then the analysis' focus As with most pavement preservation tools, microsurfacing has will shift to specific lessons learned. Finally, the results of the many uses and those uses differ from agency to agency based case study will be compared with the information derived from on individual experiences, climatic conditions, and traffic vol- the other study instruments to generate conclusions and effec- umes. The previous chapters have chronicled the very aspects tive practices. of microsurfacing from a general practice level. This chapter will review six case studies. Each was selected because it detailed a specific aspect of microsurfacing's state of the prac- Microsurfacing as Pavement Preservation-- tice. Kohn (1997) posits that case study research can be used Maine Department of Transportation for the following reasons: This case study consisted of a 5-year field test of microsurfac- · To explore new areas and issues where little theory is ing placed on asphalt pavements on two highways in northern available or measurement is unclear; Maine. The test compared microsurfacing with thin (1.7 in. or · To describe a process or the effects of an event or an 43 mm) hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays. The objective of the intervention, especially when such events affect many trials was to evaluate microsurfacing's ability to "extend the different parties; and service life of two projects" (Marquis 2009). Table 42 con- · To explain a complex phenomenon. tains the salient facts about the project. Microsurfacing is the domain of specialty contractors who Results of the Maine Case Study not only install the product but, as shown in chapter three, also furnish the technical design for their product. This puts the This 5-year field evaluation found that microsurfaced sections agency at a disadvantage in terms of theoretical knowledge showed considerably more wear than the HMA overlay sec- and experience. The survey found that fully one-fourth of the tions. The details are as follows: agency respondents did not even use microsurfacing, making it a new area for those entities. Pavement maintenance and preservation is by definition an intervention whose process · Most high spots of the microsurfaced roadway have been needs to be clearly described to ensure that it is properly uti- abraded by winter snow removal equipment. In some lized and its inherent benefits are accrued by the owner agency. areas the microsurfaced treatment has been worn away Finally, chapter three shows it to be a complex phenomenon completely. that needs to be explained so that its desirable qualities can be · Microsurfacing has higher IRI [International Roughness properly exploited for pavement maintenance and preserva- Index] values and Frictional Resistance is slightly higher tion programs. Hence, all three of these reasons apply to this than the HMA sections. synthesis report, making the case studies particularly valuable · Microsurfacing appeared to slow the progression of to this type of study. reflective cracking up [for 2 years] . . . [then] cracks reflected through the microsurfaced sections at a higher rate than the HMA sections. CASE STUDY DESCRIPTIONS · Microsurface treatments claim to add between five and seven years life to existing pavements. This appears to be Table 41 summarizes the case study programs that will follow the case on the Limestone project where the material is this section. Scanning the table will show that the cases were performing as expected. The only apparent issue is snow drawn from agencies across the United States and in Canada. plow abrasion (Marquis 2009). They also encompass both warm southern climates and cold northern climates where snowplowing impacts microsurfac- ing performance. Each was selected to demonstrate a spe- Lessons Learned cific aspect of microsurfacing practice. The case studies were drawn from the literature and fleshed out with telephonic or A full analysis of the three reports available in this case study face-to-face interviews where necessary to ensure an accurate (Marquis 2002, 2004, 2009) provides two lessons learned. The
OCR for page 56
57 TABLE 41 CASE STUDY PROGRAM SUMMARY Case Study Agency/Location Reason for Inclusion Remarks Microsurfacing as a Maine DOT Specific use for Demonstrates pavement preservation Caribou, Maine pavement preservation; microsurfacing treatment long-term performance performance in cold, snowy in an area with heavy climate; answers concerns snowplowing that it is not appropriate on roads with heavy snowplowing Use of microsurfacing York Region Focus on safety; Demonstrates a use for as a preventive Ontario, Canada specific use for microsurfacing that does maintenance treatment preventive maintenance not focus on pavement to improve safety distress Long-term comparative Oklahoma DOT Used for filling deep Very comprehensive look performance of Tulsa and Oklahoma ruts and treating at the treatment in a variety microsurfacing on City, Oklahoma alligator cracking on of situations asphalt and concrete high-volume interstate; pavements 9-year record Microsurfacing on a Georgia DOT Heavy urban traffic Agency survey response high traffic interstate Atlanta, Georgia volume; road noise indicated they do not use highway evaluation microsurfacing Microsurfacing on Kansas DOT Evaluation of ride Ride quality is of prime Jointed plain concrete Cowley County, quality improvement; importance on concrete pavement Kansas use of microsurfacing pavements; comparison is on a concrete surface with a hot-mix overlay Microsurfacing using a Minnesota DOT Evaluation of cracking Provides an alternative for softer binder Albertville, Minnesota and rut filling situations where cracking is performance the primary issue first lesson regards the impact of snowplowing on microsur- (AADT)] and only rut depth was unacceptable on the Presque facing. Both microsurfacing sections were visibly abraded by Isle (8,600 AADT). Thus, the following lesson learned can snow removal equipment. The report states: "Most high spots be noted: of the microsurfaced roadway have been abraded by winter snow removal equipment." Given this premise, the three per- Snowplowing will abrade microsurfacing and eventually formance measures studied (International Roughness Index, wear it away. Although this is an issue if the treatment is rut depth, and friction number) were all within acceptable lim- used to act as a seal to water intrusion it does not signifi- its for the Limestone road [1,100 average annual daily traffic cantly impact the use of microsurfacing to enhance ride TABLE 42 MAINE DOT CASE STUDY FACTS Item Data Binder CSS-1H Aggregate Type III Mineral Filler Non-air entrained portland cement Job Mix Design Aggregate 100% Portland cement 1.0% Water 10.0% Binder 12.0% + 1% Test Specification Residual asphalt 8.3 Wet track abrasion--1 h 470.0 Wet track abrasion--6 day 680.0 Excess asphalt loaded wheel 453.2 Wet stripping 96.0 Compatibility 11 pts Location Route 1 between Presque Isle and Caribou, Maine Route 1A between Limestone and Caswell, Maine ADT 8,600 and 1,100, respectively Distress Level Before Microsurfacing IRI (m/km) 0.97 to 2.14 (62 to 136 in./mile) Rut depth (mm) 9.95 to 12.75 (0.39 to 0.50 in.) Friction number Average 53.2 Length of Test Period 5 years Snowplowing? Yes ADT = average daily traffic.
OCR for page 57
58 quality and skid resistance or as a rut filling technique on Microsurfacing as Preventive Maintenance-- a structurally sound pavement. York Region The second lesson in this case deals with skid resistance. This case study consisted of the analysis of microsurfacing's Both the Presque Isle and Limestone microsurfaced test sec- impact on safety when used as a preventive maintenance tool tions were found to furnish higher skid numbers throughout to restore skid resistance. The study evaluated accident rates the 5-year test period than the HMA test sections on the same over a 4-year period of microsurfacing placed on pavements roads. The higher volume road lost 3.4% and the lower volume on two highways in the Region of York in Ontario, Canada. road lost 1.1% over the period. Therefore, the lesson learned is: The test compared 28 microsurfacing sites with 12 HMA over- lays. The objective of the study was to evaluate the inclusion Using microsurfacing to correct the loss of frictional resis- of safety issues in an agency's preventive maintenance pro- tance on a structurally sound pavement works well in a gram (Erwin and Tighe 2008). It used the two types of pave- Northern climate. ment surface treatments and an accident rate before and after to test the study's hypothesis. Table 43 contains the salient facts about the project. Effective Practices One effective practice can be derived from this case study. The Results of the York Case Study analysis of the literature review shown in Table 7 (chapter three) found that among those authors that specifically men- Figure 26 is a map that shows the location of the York Region tioned snowplowing that microsurfacing was found to be suit- in the Canadian Province of Ontario. The results of the study able for use in those areas more often than it was cited as a are summarized as follows: concern (four positive versus one negative citations). Next, the survey received responses from 23 states where winter snow · Microsurfacing has a positive safety effect when applied at loca- removal is an issue and only 6 did not include microsurfacing tions with an AADT greater than 3,000 vehicles per lane. in their pavement maintenance programs. Additionally, all of · Microsurfacing has been demonstrated to have a positive safety the Canadian provinces except one use microsurfacing. There- effect on locations with higher traffic volumes susceptible to any one or combination of these conditions: fore, the intersection of those two lines of information with the occurrence of wet or slick (not dry) road surface conditions; one contained in this case study yields the following effective trend in severe crashes; practice: frequent intersection-related crashes; and high occurrence of rear-end crashes. · Another point to consider is that contractors [furnish lower] Microsurfacing can be effectively employed on roads treatment prices for larger jobs. To capitalize on that opportunity where routine winter snow removal is a factor if the under- and keeping in mind that microsurfacing was demonstrated to lying pavement is structurally sound. be very effective at reducing intersection-related crashes, when TABLE 43 YORK REGION CASE STUDY FACTS Item Data Binder CSS-1h Aggregate Type III Mineral Filler Non-air entrained portland cement Job Mix Design--Typical Aggregate 100% Portland cement 2.0% Water 10.0% Binder 11.5% + 1% Test Specification--Typical Residual asphalt 6.0% to 11.5% Wet track abrasion--1 h 538.0 Wet track abrasion--6 day 807.0 Excess asphalt loaded wheel 538.0 Wet stripping 90.0 Compatibility 11 pts Location 28 sites through the Reg ion of York AADT 1,000 to 7,000+ Distress Level Before Microsurfacing IRI (m/km) Not available Rut depth (mm) Not available Friction number Not available Length of Test Period 4 years Snowplowing? Yes AADT = average annual daily traffic.
OCR for page 58
59 survey responses reflected that using it to improve friction is not currently a primary reason for selecting microsurfacing for a given project. Long-Term Evaluation of Microsurfacing Performance--Oklahoma Department of Transportation This case study reports on an early large-scale field test of microsurfacing used to fill deep ruts and alligator cracking on high-volume four-lane divided highways in Oklahoma. The three sites studies were located in Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The study lasted 9 years and yielded valuable informa- tion that the Oklahoma DOT used to modify its microsurfacing program. That the Oklahoma DOT still uses microsurfacing as a major tool in its pavement maintenance and preservation pro- FIGURE 26 Map of the York region case study. gram amply demonstrates the value of including the case study in this synthesis. Table 44 contains the important data about prioritizing treatment sites; one could group intersection to and this case. Table 45 shows the aggregate gradations used by the tender them out as single job. Such foresight in the planning DOT specifically for deep rut filling and alligator cracking process can help agencies stretch their budgets farther while compared with the standard microsurfacing gradation. making the roads safer. Results of the Oklahoma DOT Case Study Lessons Learned The major findings of this robust study are as follows: Two lessons can be drawn from this case study. First, the idea of including safety in a public highway agency's pavement · Microsurfacing reduces the level of rutting and retards the rate maintenance/preservation program is appropriate. A struc- of rutting for up to four years of service. · Microsurfacing provides good friction characteristics for up to turally sound pavement could be rendered unsafe merely to loss nine years of service. of skid resistance resulting from the polishing of the pave- · Microsurfacing can be used effectively to fill ruts up to 38 mm ment's aggregate (Gransberg 2009). The literature shows that (1.5 inch) deep. countries with a tradition of performance-based pavement · Microsurfacing works well for filling depression cracks and alligator cracks. maintenance contracting such as Australia and New Zealand · Microsurfacing worked successfully with mine chat (cherty include accident rates as a key performance indicator (Grans- limestone) and dolomite/granite aggregate mixture (Hixon and berg et al. 2010). Therefore, adding an analysis of accident rates Ooten 1993). to the pavement maintenance/preservation project selection process makes sense. The lesson learned here is as follows: Lessons Learned Because microsurfacing has shown itself to be particu- Two lessons learned can be derived from this case. The first larly effective in reducing intersection accidents, adding regards the sustainability of microsurfacing and the ability to safety issues to the project-specific treatment selection increase its "greenness" by utilizing recycled waste materials process may furnish added value to an agency's pavement such as mine chat. Not only does microsurfacing require maintenance/preservation program. less bituminous material, because it is cold-laid it con- sumes less energy than other treatment alternatives. There- The second lesson learned is that it would be beneficial to fore, the lesson learned in this case is as follows: use microsurfacing in localized areas that are expected to experience frequent stopping. For instance, freeway ramps Microsurfacing is a "green" alternative and can be used would benefit from a higher friction surface to enhance emer- to promote sustainable maintenance practices by using gency stopping during unexpected situations. Thus, the lesson recycled waste products such as mine chat for aggregate learned is: and products such as fly ash and cement kiln dust as min- eral filler. Microsurfacing can be effectively used to enhance skid resistance in areas where a reduction in stopping distance The second lesson learned comes from the special aggre- is critical to safe operation of a given highway feature. gate gradations used by the Oklahoma DOT. The literature contradicts the Oklahoma experience with regard to alligator This approach has not been developed enough to yield an cracking as can be seen in Table 9. However, because the effective practice. It does intersect with the literature, but the Oklahoma DOT used a special gradation designed specifically
OCR for page 59
60 TABLE 44 OKLAHOMA DOT CASE STUDY FACTS Item Data Binder CSS-1h Aggregate See Table 45 Mineral filler Non-air entrained portland cement Job Mix Design--Typical Aggregate 90% Portland cement 2.0% Water 9.0% Binder 9% + 1% Test Specification--Typical Residual asphalt 8.0% to 13.0% Wet track abrasion--1 h Not available Wet track abrasion--6 day Not available Excess asphalt loaded wheel Not available Wet stripping Not available Compatibility Not available Location I-40 in Oklahoma City: 2 sites US-64 in Tulsa: 1 site AADT 11,000 to 40,000 Distress Level Before Microsurfacing IRI (m/km) Not available Rut depth (mm) 72 to 81 mm (2.8 to 3.2 in.) Friction number 3244 Length of Test Period 9 years Snowplowing? No AADT = average annual daily traffic. to treat alligator cracking, the two lines of information are not case study and the literature, the following effective practice directly comparable. Thus, it appears that a one-size-fits-all is proposed: approach to microsurfacing design may optimize microsurfac- ing's rut filling ability at the expense of its crack filling ability. Microsurfacing is the proper alternative to enhance skid This idea is validated because the Oklahoma DOT used a spe- resistance in areas where the frictional characteristics of cial gradation for filling deep ruts rather than the "normal" gra- the road's surface are to be restored to safe operating limits. dation. Therefore, the lesson learned is: The aggregate gradation in the job mix design is to be cus- Microsurfacing on High-volume Roads-- tomized to match the primary purpose of utilizing micro- Georgia Department of Transportation surfacing on a given road with specific gradations being This case study (Tables 46 and 47) consisted of an experimen- developed for cracking versus rut filling. tal trial of microsurfacing to address wheel path raveling and cracking on 92 lane-kilometers of Interstate 285 in Atlanta. Effective Practices Because the motivation for the project was part of the prepara- tion for the 1996 Summer Olympics, aesthetics was also a con- Taking the findings in this case study regarding microsurfac- sideration. The project used both a tack coat and a scratch ing's ability to furnish long-term surface friction characteris- course. The Georgia DOT evaluated friction, crack propaga- tics and intersecting it with the information found in the York tion, and road noise. TABLE 45 OKLAHOMA DOT CASE STUDY AGGREGATE GRADATIONS Percentage Passing ODOT-Type I ODOT-Type II ODOT-Type III Sieve Size (alligator cracking) (normal) (deep ruts) 3/8 (9.5 mm) 100 99100 98100 #4 (4.75 mm) 98100 8094 7585 #10 (2.36 mm) 6886 4460 4555 #40 (420 µm) 2241 1230 1525 #80 (177 µm) 1025 820 825 #200 (75 µm) 515 515 28 Source: Hixon and Ooten (1993).
OCR for page 60
61 TABLE 46 GEORGIA DOT CASE STUDY FACTS Item Data Binder CSS-1HLM (Ralumac with 3% natural latex) Aggregate See Table 47 Mineral filler Type I portland cement Job Mix Design--Typical Aggregate 100% Portland cement 1.0% Water 10.0% Binder 7.4% Test Specification--Typical Residual asphalt 6.8% Wet track abrasion--1 h 807 Wet track abrasion6 day 538 Excess asphalt loaded wheel 538 Wet stripping 90% Compatibility Pass Location I-285 in Atlanta, Georgia AADT 55,650 Distress Level Before Microsurfacing IRI (m/km) 0.573 (36.1 in./mile) Rut depth (mm) 19 mm (0.75 in.) Friction number 4650 Length of Test Period 2 years Snowplowing? no AADT = average annual daily traffic. TABLE 47 The unique feature of this study was the comparison of GEORGIA DOT CASE STUDY noise levels with other surface courses. Table 48 provides AGGREGATE GRADATION the comparison with several locations in the Atlanta metro Percentage Passing area. It shows that the change is virtually negligible. When Sieve Size GDOT 3/8 (9.5 mm) 100 this is compared with the survey results where the respon- #4 (4.75 mm) 80 dents cited road noise as the most frequent public complaint #8 (2.36 mm) 6886 about microsurfacing a dichotomy exists. One possible expla- #50 (300 µm) 2241 nation is that public road noise complaints are the result of #200 (75 µm) 515 the differential change from the original surface, which may have seemed quieter owing to low friction characteristics, Results of the Georgia DOT Case Study and the microsurfacing that increased the texture of the wheel paths. The Georgia DOT case study is summarized as follows: · The microsurfacing used on I-285 has performed quite well. Lessons Learned · No additional problems with raveling or load cracking have been encountered. The major lesson from this case study deals with the qualita- · The mix has provided excellent smoothness and good friction, with a minimal increase in pavement noise levels. tive aspects of microsurfacing and its use as a "quick fix" to · It is aesthetically superior to slurry seal because of its resem- enhance the appearance of a road at a low cost while extend- blance to hot-mix asphalt (Watson and Jared 1998). ing its life and enhancing the safety of the traveling public by TABLE 48 COMPARISON OF MICROSURFACING ROAD NOISE TO OTHER COMMON SURFACES Surface Course Average Decibels Microsurfacing Difference Microsurfacing 74.9 -- Conventional OGFC 73.9 +1.0 Modified OGFC 72.8 +2.1 Porous European Mix 72.7 +2.2 Dense Graded Surface Mix 73.1 +1.8 Portland Cement Concrete 73.1 +1.8 Source: Watson and Jared (1998). OGFC = open-graded friction course.
OCR for page 61
62 increasing friction numbers. This speaks to the public relations Results of the Kansas DOT Case Study aspects that impact public highway agencies. It also demon- strated that road noise complaints are largely perceptional and The results of the Kansas DOT case study project in Cowley that the public can be educated by showing them the numbers County, Kansas, can be summarized as follows: such as the Georgia DOT did. Thus, this lesson can be stated as follows: · A relatively thin application of microsurfacing (20.6 kg/m2) placed in two lifts improved the ride Microsurfacing can be used as a cost-effective means to quality of JPCP [jointed plain concrete pavement]. enhance the visual quality of a high-volume road while · The contractor was able to complete the 1.6 km (1 mile) simultaneously enhancing skid resistance, smoothness, and test section including the sealing of joints and cracks in addressing raveling and cracking issues on a high-volume 10 working days. highway. · The ride quality improvement when a short-span, 2.4-m ski was attached to the paving box indicated a minor This case study did not yield any effective practices. increase (16.7% on average) in smoothness from the original pavement. · The use of a 4.9-m ski produced a marked improvement Microsurfacing Performance on Concrete (49% on average) in smoothness from the original Pavement--Kansas Department of Transportation pavement. · The average final profile index on the project for the The objective of this case study was to test microsurfacing's 14.1-km (8.8-mi) section where the 4.9-m ski was ability to improve ride quality on a jointed, plain concrete used was 436 mm (27.48 in.), well within the limits pavement on US-77 in Cowley County, Kansas. Kansas DOT established by Kansas DOT of 254 to 762 mm for engineers investigated a number of alternatives (diamond a 100-mm-thick bituminous pavement (Moulthrop grinding, HMA overlay, and cracking and sealing) and selected et al. 1996). microsurfacing based on cost and time required for installa- tion. The concrete pavement was structurally sound, although the ride was rough owing to joints that were faulted approx- Lessons Learned imately 6 mm (0.25 in.). Before installation, the joints and cracks in the substrate were sealed and a tack coat consisting This case study project documents the successful enhancement of SS-1h emulsion was applied. Tables 49 and 50 contain the of ride quality on jointed plain concrete pavement using micro- details of this case. surfacing. It was included because much of the nation's Inter- TABLE 49 KANSAS DOT CASE STUDY FACTS Item Data Binder CSS-1HLM (Ralumac) Aggregate See Table 50 Mineral filler Type I portland cement Job Mix Design--Typical Aggregate 100% Portland cement 1.75% + 0.25% Water As required Binder 7.6% + 0.4% Test Specification--Typical Residual asphalt 6.8% Wet track abrasion--1 h Not available Wet track abrasion--6 day Not available Excess asphalt loaded wheel Not available Wet stripping Not available Compatibility Pass Location US-77 in Cowley County, Kansas AADT 4,000 Distress Level Before Microsurfacing IRI (m/km) 0.848 to 0.929 (52.6 to 57.6 in./mile) Rut depth (mm) Not applicable Friction number Not applicable Length of Test Period 2 years Snowplowing? Yes AADT = average annual daily traffic.
OCR for page 62
63 TABLE 50 rigid strikeoff is used, it does not flex. This rigidity allows for bet- KANSAS DOT CASE STUDY ter reprofiling of the pavement section (Moulthrop et al. 1996). AGGREGATE GRADATION Percentage Passing Therefore the following effective practice is found: Sieve Size KDOT 3/8 (9.5 mm) 99100 When using microsurfacing to improve ride quality on #4 (4.75 mm) 8694 #8 (2.36 mm) 4565 jointed plain concrete pavements, the spreader box can be #16 (1.19 mm) 2546 modified to furnish better support across the joints and the #30 (300 µm) 1535 flexible rubber strike-off can be replaced with a rigid strike- #50 (297 µm) 1025 #200 (75 µm) 515 off to improve smoothness. Microsurfacing Performance with a Softer Binder--Minnesota Department of Transportation state Highway System was constructed using this pavement type, and ride roughness is a major issue on roads with this The objective of this case study was to test the impact of a softer type of pavement. Often concrete pavements are found in binder on microsurfacing's ability to resist reflective cracking urban areas where the high traffic volume initially warranted and act as a surface preparation measure for subsequent level- the higher construction cost and lower life-cycle costs that ing or rut-filling courses. Minnesota DOT engineers investi- concrete furnishes. The cardinal outcome of the case was the gated this treatment on four test sections originally paved in finding that microsurfacing delivered a smoothness that was 1993. Before installation, cracks in the substrate were sealed comparable to hot mix (Moulthrop et al. 1996). Thus, this case in only one test section and a tack coat consisting of diluted provides a valuable tool for pavement managers dealing with CSS-1h emulsion was applied. Table 51 contains the details this issue. Two lessons learned can be derived from this case of this case. study project. · Microsurfacing furnishes a cost-effective means to Results of the Minnesota DOT Case Study improve ride quality on jointed concrete pavements; and The results of the Minnesota DOT case study project at the · Microsurfacing provides an expeditious means to Minnesota Test Road Facility can be summarized as follows: improve ride quality while minimizing disruption to traffic. · The construction phase demonstrated the viability of producing and placing microsurfacing slurry mixtures at Effective Practices 12.5% and 16.5% emulsion levels. Mixture consolida- tion did not appear problematic when very-low-volume In this case study, the standard microsurfacing equipment traffic was involved. needed to be modified for use on jointed concrete pavement. · Following a 6-month service period that included a A detailed explanation of the modifications is as follows: northern climate winter, the project was evaluated for reflective cracking, smoothness, and rutting. Approxi- The standard load-bearing support for the laydown box consists of mately 71% of transverse cracks and 5% of longitudinal three steel skis, on which the box rides as it is pulled along the pave- cracks had reflected through the microsurface. ment. These skis are normally 1.8 m (6 ft) long at the outside sup- Transverse cracks in lanes constructed with scratch port location and shorter at the middle of the box. For this project, and wear course mixtures had reflected through the the skis were initially changed to 2.4 m in length to help support the laydown box when it passed over the faulted joints. This did not microsurface to 88% of preconstruction numbers. produce the desired smoothness and, after consultation with the Transverse cracks in lanes constructed with rut-fill and project engineers, it was decided that the box needed to have better wear course mixtures had reflected through the micro- support to stop it from tipping when the skis passed over the joints. surface to 60% of preconstruction numbers. The contractor fabricated a 4.9-m-long supported-beam leveling arm that attached solidly to the laydown box at the outside edge. Patched locations were not reflecting through the This beam had attached at each end of it small metal skis that piv- microsurface. oted when the ski passed over the joints. The beam was attached to · Pavement IRI measurements showed little change from the laydown box so that the standard 1.8 m skis were left attached the post-construction condition. The 6-month IRI was to the bottom of the box. The beam supported the box, which elim- inated the tipping. The other equipment adjustment made to the found to have decreased by 22% for lanes constructed standard laydown box configuration was the use of a steel (rigid) with scratch and wear course mixtures, and by 58% for strikeoff plate instead of the rubber (flexible) strikeoff that is nor- lanes constructed with rut-fill and wear course mixtures. mally used. Usually a microsurfacing laydown box uses a rubber · Rut conditions as measured after construction showed strikeoff to finish the surface. When a flexible strikeoff is used, downward pressure is applied to the fresh mix, which causes a the following results: small amount of deformation in the surface. Rubber tends to follow A 4% to 6% decrease for lanes constructed with the natural surface contours, thus restricting the leveling. When a scratch and wear course mixtures,