Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 47


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 46
46 Guidebook for Developing and Leasing Airport Property and charges for the use of the public airport. In terms of land valuation under long-term lease agreements, the airport sponsor is therefore obligated to establish a fair market rental rate. User fees for aeronautical and nonaeronautical activities are also bound by the fair and equitable test, so application of incentives and abatements must be approached with eyes wide open, always asking the question of what the airport will do when the next request arrives and what the param- eters for application of incentives and abatements should be (see Section 3.2: Grant Assurances and Federal Compliance for more information). The federal government also plays a role in both navigable airspace and height hazard issues. Specifically, the latest version of FAA Form 7460, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, should be submitted by the developer/tenant early in the planning process to ensure the FAA has the opportunity to review the proposed plans within the context of impact to imaginary surfaces and navigable airspace. The FAA's Airport District Offices provide leadership in planning and development for a safe and efficient National Airspace System (NAS). Airport District Offices also award the $3.5+ bil- lion annually in AIP grants and approve passenger facility charge collections. In addition, the FAA manages national airport planning, environmental and social requirements, and establishes policies related to airport rates and charges, compliance with grant assurances, and airport pri- vatization. A host of federal agencies may be able to participate in airport development projects as well, since airports tend to touch a broad range of eligibility. Department of Transportation funding, beyond FAA, in areas of highway and transit, economic development funding, and Homeland Security programs are among the federal programs that may also assist an airport sponsor in structuring an airport development project. In terms of planning, regulatory oversight, and as a source of funding, the federal government, through the FAA, the TSA, EPA, and the Economic Development Administration has a hand in all aspects of airport operation and potential development. Contact and cooperation with these agen- cies should be sought directly by the airport sponsor. Depending upon the size, scope, and purpose of the potential project, airport sponsors often utilize their elected representatives (U.S. Represen- tatives and U.S. Senators) to serve as advocates to voice local requests within the federal agencies. Local EDA/EDC officials may also provide a conduit to federal Department of Commerce EDA officials, opening additional avenues of funding and assistance for airport development projects. 3.6 Sociopolitical Considerations The social and political makeup of a community or a region can certainly impact airport devel- opment and bears consideration in preparing the airport for potential airport development. In many cases, airport development is viewed as a job creation opportunity, with aviation often seen as paying above-average wages. Social and political pressures can also serve as the catalyst to pro- vide incentives for development in a less than ideal or inappropriate manner. On the other hand, the sociopolitical environment surrounding an airport can provide the opposite effect. If the airport is seen as a poor neighbor bringing unwanted or undesirable activ- ity and/or noise, the community may place pressure to preclude airport development. Both examples illustrate the need for an awareness of the sociopolitical climate, and the fact that airport development can be impacted one way or the other. For these reasons, involving the stakeholders early and anticipating concerns can facilitate the development process. If fears or concerns from the community are anticipated, preparation to fairly characterize the project can be made in advance. If too much enthusiasm is anticipated, enlistment of appropriate parties to provide incentives can be orchestrated proactively.