Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 98


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 97
97 References AASHTO. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian FHWA. Traffic Analysis Toolbox. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysis Facilities. ISBN: 1-56051-293-8. Washington, D.C., 2004. tools/index.htm. Accessed January 20, 2010. AASHTO. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fitzpatrick, K., S. Turner, M. Brewer, P. Carlson, B. Ullman, N. Trout, Washington, D.C., 2004. E. S. Park, J. Whitacre, N. Lalani, and D. Lord. TCRP Report 112/ Ashmead, D., D. Guth, R. Wall, R. Long, and P. Ponchillia. Street Cross- NCHRP Report 562: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized ing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout. Intersections. Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, emies, Washington, D.C., 2006. November 1, 2005, pp. 812821. Geruschat, D. R. and S. E. Hassan. Driver Behavior in Yielding to Ayres, T. J., C. T. Wood, R. A. Schmidt, and R. L. McCarthy. Risk Per- Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts. Journal of Visual ception and Behavioral Choice. International Journal of Cognitive Impairment & Blindness, 99(5), 2005, pp. 286312. Ergonomics, Vol. 2 (1-2), 1998, pp. 3552. Special issue: Hazard Geruschat, D. R., S. E. Hassan, K. A. Turano, H. A. Quigley, and N. G. Communication. Congdon. Gaze Behavior of the Visually Impaired During Street Baranowski, B. Pedestrian Crosswalk Signals at Roundabouts: Where Crossing. Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 83, No. 8, 2006, Are They Applicable? Presented at the Institute of Transportation pp. 550558. Engineers District 6 Annual Meeting, June 2004. Greening, L. and C. C. Chandler. Why It Can't Happen to Me: The Base Barlow, J., B. L. Bentzen, and T. Bond. Blind Pedestrians and the Rate Matters, but Overestimating Skill Leads to Underestimating Changing Technology and Geometry of Signalized Intersections: Risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1997, pp. 760780. Safety, Orientation and Independence. Journal of Visual Impair- Guth, D. A., E. W. Hill, and J. J. Reiser. Tests of Blind Pedestrians' Use ment and Blindness, Vol. 99 (10), 2005, pp. 587598. of Traffic Sounds for Street-Crossing Alignment. Journal of Visual Bentzen, B. L., J. M. Barlow, and L. Franck. Addressing Barriers to Blind Impairment and Blindness, 83, 1989, pp. 461468. Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections. ITE Journal, Vol. 70, No. 9, Guth, D., D. Ashmead, R. Long, and P. Ponchillia. Blind and Sighted 2000, pp. 3235. Pedestrians' Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human City of Hamilton. Development of Policy Papers for Phase Two of Factors, 47(2), 2005, pp. 314342. the Transportation Master Plan for the City of Hamilton: War- Hassan, S., D. Geruschat, and K. Turano. Head Movements while rants Policy Paper. City of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. June Crossing Streets: Effects of Vision Impairment. Optometry and 2005. www.myhamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/4C9CF984-05C0-43F0- Vision Science, 82, 2005, pp. 1826. BB30-ECB4A99AA598/0/23WarrantsJan2005_2357651.pdf. Inman, V. W., G. W. Davis, and D. Sauerburger. Pedestrian Access to Accessed January 20, 2010. Roundabouts: Assessment of Motorist Yielding to Visually Impaired Davis, G. and V. Inman. Pedestrian Access to Roundabouts: Closed Course Pedestrians and Potential Treatments to Improve Access. Report Test of Yielding Vehicle Detection System. http://www.access Number FHWAHRT05080, FHWA, McLean, VA, 2005. management.gov/AM2004/AM0411p_Roundabouts.pdf. Accessed Institute for Transportation Engineers, ITE. Manual of Transportation February 8, 2007. Studies. Washington, D.C., 1994. Department of Justice, DOJ. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Institute for Transportation Engineers, ITE. Traffic Engineering Hand- Title 42, Chapter 125 of the United States Code. The United States book. ISBN: 1-933452-34-X, Washington, D.C., 2009. Access Board. www.ada.gov. Accessed February 2009. Knauper, B., R. Kornik, K. Atkinson, C. Guberman, and C. Aydin. FHWA. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. FHWA Turner Fairbank Motivation Influences the Underestimation of Cumulative Risk. Highway Research Center. FHWA-RD-00-067. McLean, VA, 2000. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2005, FHWA. Signalized Intersections: Informational Guide. Publication pp. 15111523. No. FHWA-HRT-04-091. Washington, D.C., 2004. Long, R., D. Guth, P. Ponchillia, D. Ashmead, R. Wall. Access to FHWA. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report. Roundabouts by Persons with Blindness and Visual Impairments. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-08-051. Washington, D.C., 2008. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Association for FHWA. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and High- Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired, ways, 2009 Edition. Washington, D.C., 2009. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002.

OCR for page 97
98 May, D. Traffic Flow Theory Fundamental. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Saddle River, NJ, 1990. 2007. Midwest Research Institute. Synthesis on Lane Widths, Channelized Right Schroeder, B. J. and N. M. Rouphail. Mixed-Priority Pedestrian Delay Turns, and Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes in Urban and Suburban Models at Single-Lane Roundabouts. In Transportation Research Areas. NCHRP Project 3-72. http://144.171.11.40/cmsfeed/TRB Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2182, NetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=826. Accessed January 20, 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- National Institutes of Health, NIH. NIH/NEI Bioengineering Research ington, D.C., 2010, pp. 129138. Partnership Grant R01 EY12894-03, 2010. Schroeder, B., N. Rouphail, and R. Hughes. Towards Roundabout Acces- Neuman, T. NCHRP Report 279: Intersection Channelization Design sibility: Exploring the Operational Impact of Pedestrian Signalization Guide. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Options at Modern Roundabouts. ASCE Journal of Transportation Washington, D.C., 1985. Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 6, June 2008, pp. 262271. New South Wales. Traffic Signal Design. Section 2: Warrants. Version 1.1. Schroeder, B., N. Rouphail, and R. Hughes. A Working Concept of Roads and Traffic Authority (New South Wales, Australia). Aug- Accessibility: Performance Measures for the Usability of Crosswalks ust 2008. www.rta.nsw.gov.au/doingbusinesswithus/downloads/ for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. Transportation Research technicalmanuals/trafficsignaldesign_dl1.html. Accessed January Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, 20, 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- Persaud, B. N., R. A. Retting, P. E. Garder, and D. Lord. Crash Reduc- ington, D.C., 2009, pp. 103110. tion Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States. Schroeder, B., N. Rouphail, and R. Wall Emerson. Exploratory Analy- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, March 2000. sis of Crossing Difficulties for Blind and Sighted Pedestrians at PTV. VISSIM 4.10 User Manual. Karlsruhe, Germany, March 2005. Channelized Turn Lanes. Transportation Research Record: Journal Queensland. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Department of of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, Transportation Main Roads (Queensland, Australia). 2003. http://www.mainroads. Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., qld.gov.au/web/partnersCR.nsf/DOCINDEX/Manual+of+uniform+ October 2006. traffic+control+devices. Accessed January 20, 2010. Transportation Research Board, TRB. Highway Capacity Manual. Trans- Rodegerdts, L., M. Blogg, E. Wemple, E. Myers, M. Kyte, M. Dixon, G. List, portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, A. Flannery, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, N. Wu, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, D.C., 2000. D. Harkey, and D. Carter. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the U.S. Access Board (2003). Pedestrian Access to Modern Roundabouts: Unites States. Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- Design and Operational Issues for Pedestrians Who Are Blind. emies. Washington, D.C., 2007. www.access-board.gov/research/roundabouts/bulletin.htm. Accessed Rodegerdts, L., J. Bansen, C. Tiesler, J. Knudsen, E. Myers, M. Johnson, January 20, 2010. M. Moule, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, S. Hallmark, H. Isebrands, R. B. U.S. Access Board (2005). Public Rights-of-Way Guidelines. www. Crown, B. Guichet, and A. O'Brien. NCHRP Report 672: Round- access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. Accessed January 20, 2010. abouts: An Informational Guide (Second Edition). Transportation Wall Emerson, R. and D. Sauerburger. Detecting Approaching Vehicles Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. at Streets with No Traffic Control. Journal of Visual Impairment Rouphail, N., R. Hughes, and K. Chae. Exploratory Simulation of and Blindness, AFB Press, Vol. 102, No. 12, 2008, pp. 747760. Pedestrian Crossings at Roundabouts. ASCE Journal of Transporta- Yang, J., W. Deng, J. Wang, Q. Li, and Z. Wang. Modeling Pedestrians' tion Engineering, March 2005, pp. 211218. Road Crossing Behavior in Traffic System Micro-Simulation in SAS Institute (1999). SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8, http://v8doc.sas.com. China. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 2006, pp. 280290. Accessed February 2008. Zegeer, C. V. et al. PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Counter- Schroeder, B. A Behavior-Based Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian- measure Selection System. Federal Highway Administration. Publi- Vehicle Interaction at Crosswalks. Doctoral Dissertation in Civil cation No: FHWA-SA-04-003. Washington, D.C., 2004 Engineering, North Carolina State University, May 2008. Zegeer, C. V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerwey, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and Schroeder, B. and N. Rouphail. A Framework for Evaluating Pedestrian- B. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety Vehicle Interactions at Unsignalized Crossing Facilities in a Micro- and Mobility. Federal Highway Administration. Publication No: scopic Modeling Environment. Presented at the 86th Annual FHWA-RD-01-102. Washington, D.C., 2002.