Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
102 1. AASHTO. Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (1st Edition). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2009. (2009 LRFD SGS). 2. Imbsen, R. A. Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges, 2006, Task 193. Rancho Cordova, CA: TRC/ Imbsen & Associates, Inc., 2006. (2006 LRFD RSGS). 3. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (5th Edition). Wash- ington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, 2010. 4. âââ. LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications (3rd Edition). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010. 5. Tobolski, M. J. Improving the Design and Performance of Concrete Bridges in Seismic Regions. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 2010. PhD Thesis. 6. Ralls, M. L., et al. Current U.S. Practice and Issues. Proceedings of FHWA/AASHTO Second National Prefabricated Bridge Elements & Systems Workshop. September 8â10, 2004. 7. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Development of a Precast Concrete Bent- Cap System. PCI Journal. 2008, Vol. 53, 3, pp. 74â99. 8. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Development of a Precast Bent Cap System. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001, p. 372, Research Report 1748-2. 9. Mislinski, S. Anchorage of Grouted Connectors for a Precast Bent Cap System in Seismic Regions (Part 2). Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2003. p. 91, MS Thesis. 10. Tobolski, M. J., et al. Development of Precast Bent Cap Concepts. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 2006. p. 176, SSRP Report No. 06/10. 11. Park, R. and Paulay, T. Strength and Ductility of Concrete Sub- structures of Bridges. RRU Bulletin. 1990, Vol. 84. 12. Asnaashari, A., Grafton, J. and Johnnie, M. Precast Concrete Design- Construction of San Mateo-Hayward Bridge Widening Project. PCI Journal. 2005, Vol. 50, 1, pp. 26â43. 13. Hines, E. M., Restrepo, J. I. and Seible, F. Force-Displacement Characterization of Well-Confined Bridge Piers. ACI Structural Journal. 2004, Vol. 101, 4, pp. 537â548. 14. Priestley, M. J. N. and Tao, J. R. T. Seismic Response of Precast Prestressed Concrete Frames with Partially Debonded Tendons. PCI Journal. 1993, Vol. 38, 1, pp. 58â69. 15. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Proposed Bridge Design Calculations and Drawings of the Prototype Bridge and Test Specimen. s.l.: Submitted by J. I. Restrepo and E. E. Matsumoto to NCHRP, 2006. p. 232. 16. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (3rd Edition with 2006 Interims). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004. (2006 LRFD BDS). 17. Imbsen, R. A. Proposed AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. [Online] March 22, 2007. (2007 LRFD PSGS). http://www.sciop.net/sites/bridges/docs/2007-03-09GuideSpec.pdf. 18. TRC/Imbsen Software Systems. SEISAB Userâs Manual. Ranco Cordova, CA: s.n., 2006. 19. Sayed-Mahan, M. Userâs Manual for WFprep and WFrame, 2-D Push Analysis of Bridge Bents and Frames. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation, 1995. 20. âââ. Userâs Manual for XSection, Cross Section Analysis Program. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation, 1998. 21. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Component Tests-Cast-in-place Specimen (Unit 1). Sacramento, CA: California State University, 2009. p. 99, ECS Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-01. 22. âââ. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Component Test Report-Grouted Duct Specimen (Unit 2). Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2009. p. 114. 23. âââ. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Component Tests-Cap Pocket Full Ductility Specimen (Unit 3). Sacramento, CA: California State University, 2009. p. 126, ECS- CSUS-2009-03. 24. ASTM. Standard Specification for Corrugated Steel Pipe, Metallic- Coated for Sewers and Drains, AASHTO Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2009. ASTM Designation A760/A760-M-09. 25. âââ. Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Metallic-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process for Corrugated Steel Pipe. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2007. ASTM Designation A 929/A929M-01. 26. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Component Test Report-Cap Pocket Limited Ductility Specimen (Unit 4). Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2009. p. 149. 27. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Flow of Grout for Preplaced- Aggregate Concrete (Flow Cone Method). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2006. ASTM Designation C 939-02. 28. Sritharan, S., Priestley, M. J. N. and Seible, F. Seismic Response of Column/Cap Beam Tee Connections with Cap Beam Prestressing. La References
103 Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 1996. p. 296, SSRP Report No. 96/09. 29. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (4th Edition with 2008 and 2009 Interims). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2007. 30. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Grouted Duct and Cap Pocket Test Results, Design and Construction Specifications, Design Examples, and Connection Details. Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2009. p. 749, ECS Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-05. 31. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N and Park, R. Theoretical Stress- Strain Model for Confined Concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 1988, Vol. 114, 8, pp. 1804â1826. 32. Carr, A. J. RUAUMOKOâUsers Manual. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury, 2004. 33. Mukherjee, S. and Gupta, V. K. Wavelet-based Generation of Spectrum-Compatible Time Histories. Soil Dynamics and Earth- quake Engineering. 2002, Vol. 22, pp. 799â804. 34. Newmark, N. M. A Method of Computation for Structural Dyna- mics. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division. 1959, Vol. 85, pp. 67â94. 35. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications (2nd Edition with 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Interims). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004. (LRFD BCS). 36. Brenes, F. J., Wood, S. L. and Kreger, M. E. Anchorage Requirements for Grouted Vertical-Duct Connectors in Precast Bent Cap Systems. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2006. p. 252, FHWA/TxDOT Research Report No. FHWA/TX-06-0-4176-1. 37. Steuk, K. P., Eberhard, M. O. and Stanton, J. F. Anchorage of Large- Diameter Reinforcing Bars in Ducts. ACI Structural Journal. 2009, Vols. JulyâAugust, pp. 506â513. 38. Sritharan, S. Improved Seismic Design Procedure for Concrete Bridge Joints. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 2005, Vol. 131, 9, pp. 1334â1344.