Click for next page ( 103


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 102
102 References 1. AASHTO. Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design 16. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (3rd Edition with 2006 (1st Edition). Washington, DC: American Association of State Interims). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway Highway and Transportation Officials, 2009. (2009 LRFD SGS). and Transportation Officials, 2004. (2006 LRFD BDS). 2. Imbsen, R. A. Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design 17. Imbsen, R. A. Proposed AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD of Highway Bridges, 2006, Task 193. Rancho Cordova, CA: TRC/ Seismic Bridge Design. [Online] March 22, 2007. (2007 LRFD PSGS). Imbsen & Associates, Inc., 2006. (2006 LRFD RSGS). http://www.sciop.net/sites/bridges/docs/2007-03-09GuideSpec.pdf. 3. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (5th Edition). Wash- 18. TRC/Imbsen Software Systems. SEISAB User's Manual. Ranco ington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Trans- Cordova, CA: s.n., 2006. portation Officials, 2010. 19. Sayed-Mahan, M. User's Manual for WFprep and WFrame, 2-D Push 4. ------. LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications (3rd Edition). Analysis of Bridge Bents and Frames. Sacramento, CA: California Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Department of Transportation, 1995. Transportation Officials, 2010. 20. ------. User's Manual for XSection, Cross Section Analysis Program. 5. Tobolski, M. J. Improving the Design and Performance of Concrete Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation, 1998. Bridges in Seismic Regions. La Jolla, CA: University of California, 21. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for San Diego, 2010. PhD Thesis. Seismic Regions: Component Tests-Cast-in-place Specimen (Unit 1). 6. Ralls, M. L., et al. Current U.S. Practice and Issues. Proceedings of Sacramento, CA: California State University, 2009. p. 99, ECS FHWA/AASHTO Second National Prefabricated Bridge Elements & Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-01. Systems Workshop. September 810, 2004. 22. ------. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: 7. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Development of a Precast Concrete Bent- Component Test Report-Grouted Duct Specimen (Unit 2). Sacramento, Cap System. PCI Journal. 2008, Vol. 53, 3, pp. 7499. CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2009. p. 114. 8. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Development of a Precast Bent Cap System. 23. ------. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Regions: Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, The University of Component Tests-Cap Pocket Full Ductility Specimen (Unit 3). Texas at Austin, 2001, p. 372, Research Report 1748-2. Sacramento, CA: California State University, 2009. p. 126, ECS- 9. Mislinski, S. Anchorage of Grouted Connectors for a Precast Bent Cap CSUS-2009-03. System in Seismic Regions (Part 2). Sacramento, CA: California 24. ASTM. Standard Specification for Corrugated Steel Pipe, Metallic- State University, Sacramento, 2003. p. 91, MS Thesis. Coated for Sewers and Drains, AASHTO Standard Specifications for 10. Tobolski, M. J., et al. Development of Precast Bent Cap Concepts. La Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 2006. p. 176, SSRP Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, Report No. 06/10. 2009. ASTM Designation A760/A760-M-09. 11. Park, R. and Paulay, T. Strength and Ductility of Concrete Sub- 25. ------. Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Metallic-Coated by structures of Bridges. RRU Bulletin. 1990, Vol. 84. the Hot-Dip Process for Corrugated Steel Pipe. Philadelphia, PA: 12. Asnaashari, A., Grafton, J. and Johnnie, M. Precast Concrete Design- American Society for Testing and Materials, 2007. ASTM Designation Construction of San Mateo-Hayward Bridge Widening Project. PCI A 929/A929M-01. Journal. 2005, Vol. 50, 1, pp. 2643. 26. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for 13. Hines, E. M., Restrepo, J. I. and Seible, F. Force-Displacement Seismic Regions: Component Test Report-Cap Pocket Limited Ductility Characterization of Well-Confined Bridge Piers. ACI Structural Specimen (Unit 4). Sacramento, CA: California State University, Journal. 2004, Vol. 101, 4, pp. 537548. Sacramento, 2009. p. 149. 14. Priestley, M. J. N. and Tao, J. R. T. Seismic Response of Precast 27. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Flow of Grout for Preplaced- Prestressed Concrete Frames with Partially Debonded Tendons. PCI Aggregate Concrete (Flow Cone Method). Philadelphia, PA: American Journal. 1993, Vol. 38, 1, pp. 5869. Society for Testing and Materials, 2006. ASTM Designation C 15. Matsumoto, E. E., et al. Proposed Bridge Design Calculations and 939-02. Drawings of the Prototype Bridge and Test Specimen. s.l.: Submitted 28. Sritharan, S., Priestley, M. J. N. and Seible, F. Seismic Response of by J. I. Restrepo and E. E. Matsumoto to NCHRP, 2006. p. 232. Column/Cap Beam Tee Connections with Cap Beam Prestressing. La

OCR for page 102
103 Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, 1996. p. 296, SSRP 34. Newmark, N. M. A Method of Computation for Structural Dyna- Report No. 96/09. mics. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division. 1959, 29. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (4th Edition with 2008 Vol. 85, pp. 6794. and 2009 Interims). Washington, DC: American Association of 35. AASHTO. LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications (2nd Edition with State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2007. 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Interims). Washington, DC: American 30. Matsumoto, E. E. Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seismic Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004. Regions: Grouted Duct and Cap Pocket Test Results, Design and (LRFD BCS). Construction Specifications, Design Examples, and Connection Details. 36. Brenes, F. J., Wood, S. L. and Kreger, M. E. Anchorage Requirements Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento, 2009. for Grouted Vertical-Duct Connectors in Precast Bent Cap Systems. p. 749, ECS Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-05. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, The University of 31. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N and Park, R. Theoretical Stress- Texas at Austin, 2006. p. 252, FHWA/TxDOT Research Report Strain Model for Confined Concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural No. FHWA/TX-06-0-4176-1. Engineering. 1988, Vol. 114, 8, pp. 18041826. 37. Steuk, K. P., Eberhard, M. O. and Stanton, J. F. Anchorage of Large- 32. Carr, A. J. RUAUMOKO--Users Manual. Christchurch, New Diameter Reinforcing Bars in Ducts. ACI Structural Journal. 2009, Zealand: University of Canterbury, 2004. Vols. JulyAugust, pp. 506513. 33. Mukherjee, S. and Gupta, V. K. Wavelet-based Generation of 38. Sritharan, S. Improved Seismic Design Procedure for Concrete Spectrum-Compatible Time Histories. Soil Dynamics and Earth- Bridge Joints. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 2005, Vol. 131, quake Engineering. 2002, Vol. 22, pp. 799804. 9, pp. 13341344.