National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 681: Development of a Precast Bent Cap System for Seismic Regions (2011)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Restrepo, Jose I, Matsumoto, Eric E, Tobolski, Matthew J, Transportation Research Board. "Unpublished Material." NCHRP Report 681: Development of a Precast Bent Cap System for Seismic Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
104
bottomleft bottomright
Page
104

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 104
104 Unpublished Material Attachments to the contractor's final report for NCHRP · Attachment DS9: Revised Article 8.8.1 Maximum Longitu- Project 12-74 are not published herein but are available online dinal Reinforcement at www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/164089.aspx. A list of attach- ­ Revised Article for hybrid systems ments is provided below. · Attachment DS10: Revised Article 8.8.2 Minimum Longitu- dinal Reinforcement ­ Revised Article for hybrid systems Design Specifications · Attachment DS11: Proposed Article 8.8.14 Minimum · Attachment DS1: Revised Article 2.1 Definitions Debonded Length of Longitudinal Reinforcement for ­ Revision of current article to include definitions of emu- Hybrid Columns lative and hybrid systems ­ New Article for hybrid systems · Attachment DS2: Revised Article 4.3.3 Displacement · Attachment DS12: Revised Article 8.10 Superstructure Magnification for Short Period Structures Capacity Design for Longitudinal Direction for SDC C ­ Revised Article to account for hybrid systems and D · Attachment DS3: Revised Article 4.7.2 Vertical Ground ­ Revised Article for integral precast systems Motion, Design Requirements for SDC D · Attachment DS13: Proposed Article 8.13 Joint Design for ­ Expanded Article to include explicit requirements for SDC A consideration of vertical excitation with integral precast ­ New Article for SDC A precast bent cap connection design · Attachment DS14: Proposed Article 8.14--Joint Design bent caps discontinuous at bent · Attachment DS4: Revised Article 4.11.6 Analytical Plastic for SDC B Hinge Length ­ New Article for SDC B precast bent cap connection design · Attachment DS15: Revised Article 8.15--Joint Design for ­ Revised Article to account for integral concrete super- SDCs C and D structures · ­ Revision of current Article 8.13 for SDCs C and D to Attachment DS5: Proposed Article 5.6.6 Ieff for Hybrid Article 8.15 for precast bent cap connection design Systems · Attachment DS16: Revised Article 5.10.11.4.3--Column ­ New Article for hybrid systems Connections · Attachment DS6: Revised Article 8.4.2 Reinforcing Steel ­ Revised Article to ensure AASHTO LRFD SGS is used for Modeling emulative precast bent cap-to-column connection design ­ Revised Article for hybrid systems · Attachment DS17: Proposed Article 5.11.1.2.4--Moment · Attachment DS7: Proposed Article 8.8.14 Lateral Re- Resisting Joints inforcement Requirement for Columns Connecting to a ­ Revised Article to ensure AASHTO LRFD SGS is used for Precast Bent Cap emulative precast bent cap-to-column connection design ­ New Article to ensure spacing between the hoop at top of column and the bedding layer hoop does not compro- Design Examples mise system ductility · Attachment DS8: Revised Article 8.5 Plastic Moment · Attachment DE1: SDC A Design Flow Chart Capacity for SDC B, C, and D ­ Flow chart for design of precast bent cap connections in ­ Revised Article for hybrid systems SDC A

OCR for page 105
105 · Attachment DE2: SDC A Design Example--Grouted Duct ­ Example bent cap details for grouted duct connection in Connection SDC B (minimum joint reinforcement used) ­ Design example for grouted duct connection in SDC A · Attachment ECD4: SDC B--Cap Pocket Connection (minimum joint reinforcement) ­ Example bent cap details for cap pocket connection in · Attachment DE3: SDC A Design Example--Cap Pocket SDC B (minimum joint reinforcement used) Connection · Attachment ECD5: SDCs B, C and D--Grouted Duct ­ Design example for cap pocket connection in SDC A Connection (minimum joint reinforcement) ­ Example bent cap details for grouted duct connection · Attachment DE4: SDCs B, C, and D Design Flow Chart in SDCs B, C, and D (additional joint reinforcement ­ Flow chart for design of precast bent cap connections in required) SDCs B, C, and D · Attachment ECD6: SDCs B, C and D--Cap Pocket · Attachment DE5: SDC B Design Example--Grouted Duct Connection Connection ­ Example bent cap details for cap pocket connection in ­ Design example for grouted duct connection in SDC B SDCs B, C, and D (additional joint reinforcement (minimum joint reinforcement) required) · Attachment DE6: SDC B Design Example--Cap Pocket · Attachment ECD7: SDCs B, C and D--Hybrid Connection Connection ­ Example bent cap details for hybrid connection in SDCs ­ Design example for cap pocket connection in SDC B B, C, and D (minimum joint reinforcement) · Attachment ECD8: SDCs B, C and D--Integral Connection · Attachment DE7: SDCs C and D Design Example-- ­ Example bent cap details for integral connection in SDCs Grouted Duct Connection B, C, and D ­ Design example for grouted duct connection in SDCs C and D (additional joint reinforcement) Specimen Drawings · Attachment DE8: SDCs C and D Design Example--Cap Pocket Connection · Attachment SD1: Nonintegral Prototype Drawings ­ Design example for cap pocket connection in SDCs C ­ Design drawings for nonintegral prototype structure and D (additional joint reinforcement) · Attachment SD2: Cast-in-place Specimen Drawings · Attachment DE9: SDCs C and D Design Example-- ­ Design drawings for cast-in-place specimen Hybrid Connection · Attachment SD3: Grouted Duct Specimen Drawings ­ Design example for hybrid connection in SDCs C and D ­ Design drawings for grouted duct specimen · Attachment DE10: SDCs C and D Design Example-- · Attachment SD4: Cap Pocket Full Ductility Specimen Integral Connection Drawings ­ Design example for integral connection in SDCs C and D ­ Design drawings for cap pocket full ductility specimen · Attachment SD5: Cap Pocket Limited Ductility Specimen Drawings Construction Specifications ­ Design drawings for cap pocket limited ductility specimen · Attachment CS1: Proposed Article 8.13.8--Special Require- · Attachment SD6: Conventional Hybrid Specimen Drawings ments for Precast Bent Cap Connections (AASHTO LRFD ­ Design drawings for conventional hybrid specimen Bridge Construction Specifications, 2nd Edition, 2004 with · Attachment SD7: Concrete Filled Pipe Hybrid Specimen 2005­2009 Interims) Drawings ­ New Article that adds specifications for precast bent cap ­ Design drawings for concrete filled pipe hybrid specimen connections · Attachment SD8: Dual Steel Shell Hybrid Specimen Drawings ­ Design drawings for dual steel shell hybrid specimen Example Connection Details · Attachment SD9: Integral Specimen Drawings · Attachment ECD1: SDC A--Grouted Duct Connection ­ Design drawings for integral hybrid specimen ­ Example bent cap details for grouted duct connection in SDC A Test Reports · Attachment ECD2: SDC A--Cap Pocket Connection ­ Example bent cap details for cap pocket connection in · Attachment TR1: Cast-in-place Specimen Test Report SDC A ­ Final report for experimental results from cast-in-place · Attachment ECD3: SDC B--Grouted Duct Connection specimen

OCR for page 106
106 · Attachment TR2: Grouted Duct Specimen Test Report ­ Final report for experimental results from integral ­ Final report for experimental results from grouted duct specimen specimen · Attachment TR3: Cap Pocket Full Ductility Specimen Test Corrugated Pipe Thickness Report ­ Final report for experimental results from cap pocket · Attachment CPT1: Cap Pocket Corrugated Pipe Thickness full ductility specimen Derivation · Attachment TR4: Cap Pocket Limited Ductility Specimen ­ Derivation of required pipe thickness and design Test Report parameters ­ Final report for experimental results from cap pocket limited ductility specimen Implementation Plan · Attachment TR5: Hybrid Specimens Test Report ­ Final report for experimental results from hybrid · Attachment IP1: NCHRP 12-74 Implementation Plan specimens ­ New article presented recommended implementation · Attachment TR6: Integral Specimen Test Report plan to facilitate application of research results