Techniques for Effective Highway Construction Projects in Congested Urban Areas (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

41 1. “Describing the Congestion Problem,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion/describing_ problem.htm. 2. Hecker, J.Z., Surface and Maritime Transportation Chal- lenges and Strategies for Enhancing Mobility, GAO-02- 1132T, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., Sep. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.gao.gov/ new.items/d021132t.pdf. 3. Hobbs, F. and N. Stoops, Demographic Trends in the 20th Century, Census 2000 Special Reports, Series CENSR-4, U.S. Census Bureau/U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 9–45 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/censr-4.pdf. 4. “Traffic Congestion Factoids,” Nationwide congestion results in approximately 6 billion person-hours of delay each year, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ congestion/factoids.htm. 5. “Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer (ACTT),” FHWA-HRT-06-054 HRTC-01/01-06(1M) E, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resource center/teams/construction/cpm_1ac.pdf. 6. Saphores, J.-D. and M.G. Boarnet, “Uncertainty and the Timing of an Urban Congestion Relief Investment—The No-land Case,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 189–208, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www. its.uci.edu/its/publications/papers/JOURNALS/Saphores_ no-land.pdf. 7. Shane, J., K. Strong, and D. Enz, Construction Project Administration and Management for Mitigating Work Zone Crashes and Fatalities: An Integrated Risk Manage- ment Model, MTC Project 2008-02, Midwest Transporta- tion Consortium, Iowa State University, Ames [Online]. Available: http://www.intrans.iastate.edu/reports/Shane_ Work-Zone-Crashes_FINAL.pdf. 8. Gransberg, D. and K. Molenaar, “Life-Cycle Cost Award Algorithms for Design/Build Highway Pavement Pro- jects,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, Dec. 2004, pp. 167–175 [Online]. Available: http://cedb. asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?144045. 9. Jackson, J., “Dynamic Work Zone Traffic Management,” ITE Journal, Vol. 80, No. 5, May 2010, pp. 26–33 [Online]. Available: http://www.ite.org/membersonly/ itejournal/pdf/2010/JB10EA26.pdf. 10. Lee, E.-B., K. Choi, and S. Lim, “Streamlined Strategies for Faster, Less Traffic-Disruptive Highway Rehabilitation in Urban Networks,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2081, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., pp. 38–45 [Online]. Available: http://trb.metapress.com/content/966u48l363707r34/. 11. Casertano, P., Transportation Safety, Incident and Emer- gency Management Impact on Residences and Businesses, 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (What are key trans- portation safety issues?), Pima Association of Govern- ments, Tucson, Ariz. [Online]. Available: http://www. pagnet.org/documents/transportation/transpoplanning/ rtp/2040/2040FSsafety.pdf. 12. “Work Zone Traffic Congestion and Mitigation,” Facil- ities Development Manual, Chapter 11: Design, Section 50 General Design Considerations, Subject 25 Work Zone Traffic Congestion and Mitigation, FDM 11-50-25 Work Zone Traffic Congestion and Mitigation, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison, July 31, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://roadwaystandards.dot.wi.gov/ standards/fdm/11-50-025.pdf. 13. Hakimi, S. and M. Kockelman, “Right-of-Way Acquisi- tion and Property Condemnation: A Comparison of U.S. State Laws,” Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 44, No. 3, Fall 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.trforum.org/journal/2005fall/article4.php. 14. Anspach, J.H., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 405: Utility Location and Highway Design, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 44 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.trb.org/ Publications/Blurbs/Utility_Location_and_Highway_ Design_163481.aspx. 15. Goodrum, P., A. Smith, B. Slaughter, and F. Kari, “Case Study and Statistical Analysis of Utility Conflicts on Construction Roadway Projects and Best Practices in Their Avoidance,” Journal of Urban Planning and Develop- ment, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2008, pp. 63–70 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134: 2(63). 16. Venner, M., R. Ellis, and K. Vandenbergh, Renewal Project R15:DOT—Utility Coordination: Understand- ing Key Aspects of the Problem and Opportunities for Improvement, SHRP 2/Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Mar. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ shrp2/pb_r15.pdf. 17. Riley, O., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 115: Reducing Construction Conflicts Between Highway and Utilities, Transportation Research Board, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, 73 pp. [Online]. Available: http://gulliver.trb.org/Transportationgeneral/ Blurbs/Reducing_Construction_Conflicts_Between_High way_an_154515.aspx. 18. Belobraydich, T., G. Mudd, and C.G. Griffith, Reducing Exposure of Short-term Utility Work Zones Through Effective Safety Planning, FHWA Making Work Zones Work Better Workshop, Sep. 26, 2002 [Online]. Avail- able: http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/workshops/sheet1.htm. REFERENCES

19. “State-By-State Congestion Reduction Links,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion/state_ information/index.htm. 20. “Congestion Reduction Toolbox,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion/toolbox/ index.htm. 21. “Congestion Reduction Toolbox: Better Work Zones,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion/ toolbox/work_zones.htm. 22. Bauer, J., M. Smith, and J. Mason, Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: The Blueprint for Action, A Primer, FHWA-HOP-07-122, June 2007 [Online]. Avail- able: http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/rctoprimer/ rcto_primer.pdf. 23. Highway Performance Monitoring System, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/ hpms/abouthpms.cfm. 24. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 25. Scriba, T. and L. Feast, “Using Modeling and Simulation Tools for Work Zone Analysis,” ITE Journal, Vol. 79, No. 5, May 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.all business.com/transportation/road-transportation-trucking- road/12342476-1.html. 26. Gransberg, D.D. and J.S. Shane, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, 127 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.trb. org/Main/Blurbs/Construction_ManageratRisk_Project_ Delivery_for_Hi_162916.aspx. 27. “Accelerating Urban Highway Rehabilitation with Construction Analysis Software,” FOCUS, FHWA-HRT- 06-026, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, 42 McLean, Va., June 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www. tfhrc.gov/FOCUS/june06/01.htm. 28. Caltrans Division of Design Office of Special Projects, Sacramento [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/ hq/oppd/value/. 29. “Value Engineering: Successful Practices in the Value Engineering Program,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/ve/2007/04.cfm. 30. Federal-Aid Policy Guide, Non-Regulatory Supplement, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Mar. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://fhwicsint01.fhwa. dot.gov/legsregs/directives/fapg/0625sup.htm. 31. Briggs, V., “Operations in a Regional Transportation Organization Environment,” ITE Journal, Vol. 71, No. 1, Jan. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.allbusiness. com/management/change-management/1122542-1.html. 32. Walewski, J., G.E. Gibson, Jr., and J. Jasper, Project Deliv- ery Methods and Contracting Approaches Available for Implementation by the Texas Department of Transporta- tion, FHWA/TX-0-2129-1, Research Report 0-2129-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001, 116 pp. [Online]. Available: http:// www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/2129_1.pdf. 33. Songer, A.D. and K.R. Molenaar, Selecting Design- Build-Build: Public and Private Sector Owner Attitudes, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/civil/db/papers/ slctdb/ 34. Best Practices in Project Delivery Management, NCHRP 20-68A, Scan 7-01, Scan Team Report, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/nchrp20-68A_07-01.pdf. 35. Khwaja, N. and J. Nelson, “Innovative Strategies on Dallas High Five Project,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1900, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 107–113 [Online]. Available: http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=749699.