Mix Design Practices for Warm-Mix Asphalt (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

1. NCHRP. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (software). Available online at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/ mepdg/home.htm. Accessed March 15, 2011. 2. Prowell, B.D., and Hurley, G.C. “Warm-Mix Asphalt Best Practices.” Quality Improvement Series 125. National Asphalt Pavement Associ- ation, Lanham, MD, 2007. 3. Hanz, A., Faheem, A., Mahmoud, E., and Bahia, H. “Measuring Effects of Warm-Mix Additives Using a Newly Developed Asphalt Binder Lubricity Test for DSR.” Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2010. 4. Csanyi, L.H. “Foamed Asphalt in Bituminous Paving Mixes.” Bul- letin 160. Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1957, pp. 108–122. 5. Brashears, D. “Warm Mix Hot Again.” Innovations, Vol. 1, No. 2, Gencor Industries, Inc., High Velocity Communications, Inc., Waukesha, WI, 2007, pp. 14–17. 6. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC. “Draft Final Report on National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 09-33: A Mix Design Manual for Hot Mix Asphalt.” November 2009. 7. Baumgardner, G. “REVIX™–Waterless Technology for Production of Reduced Temperature Asphalt Mixtures.” Presentation at the 2009 Petersen Asphalt Research Conference and P3 Symposium, Laramie, WY, July 18, 2008. 8. Christensen, D.W., and Bonaquist, R.F. NCHRP Report 567: Vol- umetric Requirements for Superpave Mixture Design. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006. 9. Hurley, G.C., and Prowell, B.D. Evaluation of Aspha-Min® Zeolite for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt (NCAT Report 05-04). National Cen- ter for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, June 2005. 10. Hurley, G.C., and Prowell, B.D. Evaluation of Evotherm® for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt (NCAT Report 06-02). National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, June 2006. 11. Hurley, G.C., and Prowell, B.D. Evaluation of Sasobit® for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt (NCAT Report 05-06). National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, AL, June 2006. 12. Witczak, M.W., Kaloush, K., Pellinen, T., El-Basyouny, M., and Von Quintus, H. NCHRP Report 465: Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2002. 13. Federal Highway Administration, LTPPBind Version 3.1 (Software), Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT, September 15, 2005. 14. Christensen, D.W., and Bonaquist, R.F. “Practical Application of Continuum Damage Theory to Fatigue Phenomena in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 74, 2005, pp. 963–1002. 15. Christensen, D. “Analysis of Creep Data from Indirect Tension Test on Asphalt Concrete.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 67, 1998, pp. 458–492. 16. Bell, C.A., AbWahab, Y., Cristi, M.E., and Sosnovske, D. Selection of Laboratory Aging Procedures for Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures (SHRP-A-383). Strategic Highway Research Program, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, DC, 1994. 17. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC. “Evaluation of Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixture Containing Recycled or Waste Product Materials Using Performance Testing” (Final Report for Work Order 98-32- 19). New Product Evaluation Program/Forensic Analysis Special Testing, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA, 2005. 18. Christensen, D.W., Pellinen, T., and Bonaquist, R.F. “Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete.” Journal of the Asso- ciation of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72, 2003, pp. 97–121. 19. Asphalt Pavement Environmental Council. Best Management Prac- tices to Minimize Emissions During HMA Construction (EC 101), 2007. 20. McDaniel, R., and Anderson, R.M. NCHRP Report 452: Recom- mended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in the Superpave Mix Design Method: Technician’s Manual. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001. 21. Leiva, F., and West, R.C. “Relationships Between Laboratory Mea- sured Characteristics of HMA and Field Compactability.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 77, 2008, pp. 183–220. 22. Arizona State University. E*Rutting.xls (Software). E* Implemen- tation Program Version 2.0, December, 2004. 23. Epps, J.A., Sebaaly, P.E., Penaranda, J., Maher, M.R., McCann, M.B., and Hand, A.J. NCHRP Report 444: Compatibility of a Test for Moisture-Induced Damage with Superpave Volumetric Mix Design. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, DC, 2000. References 64

65 24. Daniel, J.S., and Kim, Y.R. “Development of a Simplified Fatigue Test and Analysis Procedure Using a Viscoelastic, Continuum Damage Model,” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Tech- nologists, Vol. 71, 2002, pp. 619-650. 25. Kim, Y., Little, D.N., and Lytton, R.L. “Use of Dynamic Mechani- cal Analysis (DMA) to Evaluate the Fatigue and Healing Potential of Asphalt Binders in Sand Asphalt Mixtures.” Journal of the Asso- ciation of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 71, 2002, pp. 176–206. 26. Christensen, D.W., and Bonaquist, R. “Analysis of HMA Fatigue Data Using the Concepts of Reduced Loading Cycles and Endurance Limit.” Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78, 2009, pp. 377–416.