Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 110

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 109
109 References 1. Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd edition, Institute of Transporta- 15. Gordon, S., and Peers, J. "Designing a Community for Transporta- tion Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2004. tion Demand Management: The Laguna West Pedestrian Pocket," 2. Trip Generation, 8th edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Transportation Research Record 1321, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 138145; 3. Mixed Use Development Handbook, Urban Land Institute, Wash- p. 144 cited. ington, D.C., 2003, pp. 45. 16. Site Impact Handbook, Florida DOT, Tallahassee, April 1997, p. 55. 4. Transportation Planning Handbook, 2nd edition, Institute of Trans- 17. Districtwide Trip Generation Study, Task 5, Final Report, Walter H. portation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 561562. Keller, Inc., Florida DOT, District IV, March 1995. 5. American Public Transportation Association. "Transit Resource 18. FDOT Trip Characteristics Study of Multi-Use Developments, Tindale Guide." Transit-Oriented Development, No. 8. 2005. Oliver & Associates, Inc., Florida DOT District IV, Ft. Lauderdale, research/info/briefings/briefing_8.cfm accessed August 23, 2005. December 1993, p. V-39. 6. Steele, S.R. "Reducing Trip Generation Through Project Design," 19. "Trip Generation for Mixed-Use Developments," Colorado/ 1991 International Conference Compendium Papers, Institute of Wyoming Section Technical Committee, ITE Journal, Institute Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1991. of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., February, 1987; 7. Cervero, R. "Urban Design Issues Related to Transportation pp. 2732. Modes, Designs and Services for Neo-Traditional Developments," 20. "The Brandermill Planned Unit Developments Traffic Generation, accessed Study, Technical Report," JHK & Associates, Alexandria, VA, June Oct. 30, 2004. 1984. 8. "Neighborhood Vitality: Balancing Land Uses at a Community 21. ITE trip generation survey, Scale--Community/Neighborhood Team Discussions," March report.zgi?ID=L2263NJNHL4U, accessed October 31, 2004. 4, 2004, 22. Steiner, R. "Trip Generation and Parking Requirements in Tradi- neighborhood/landuse_balance.htm, accessed October 30, 2004. tional Shopping Districts," Transportation Research Record 1617, 9. Filion, P.; McSpurren, K.; and Huether, N. "Synergy and Move- Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ment Within Suburban Mixed Use Centers: The Toronto Experi- ington, D.C., 1998, pp., 2837; p. 29 cited. ence," Journal of Urban Affairs, Urban Affairs Association Winter 23. Sosslau, A.; A.B. Hassam; M. M. Carter; and G.V. Wickstrom. 2000, p. 427; NCHRP Report 187: Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Tech- 2166.00064/abs, accessed October 30, 2004. niques and Transferable Parameters: User's Guide, Transportation 10. Guttenplan, M.; Davis, B.; Steiner, R.; and Miller, D. "Planning- Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Level Areawide Multimodal Level-of-Service Analysis: Performance 1978. Measures for Congestion Management," Transportation Research 24. Mehra, J., and Keller, R. Development and Application of Trip Gen- Record 1858, Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- eration Rates, FHWA/PL/85/003, Federal Highway Administration, emies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 6168. January 1985, pp. 3236. 11. LUTRAQ. 1000 Friends of Oregon, 25. "San Diego Shared Parking Study," JHK & Associates, San Diego, lut_reports.html, accessed August 2005. California, July 1996. 12. Reiff, B., and Kim, K.-H. Statistical Analysis of Urban Design Vari- 26. Hooper, K. NCHRP Report 323: Travel Characteristics at Large- ables and Their Use in Travel Demand Models, Oregon DOT, Scale Suburban Activity Centers, Transportation Research Board, Salem, Oregon, November 2003, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989. modeling.html. 27. Zietsman, J. "The Traffic Impact of Suburban Multi-Use Develop- 13. Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. "Travel and the Built Environment," ments." Master of Engineering Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pre- Transportation Research Record 1780, Transportation Research Board toria, South Africa, September 1993. of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 108111. 28. Zietsman, J., and H.S. Joubert. "Quantifying the Change in Travel 14. Kittelson & Associates. Trip Generation for New Urbanist Develop- Patterns as a Result of Smart Growth." Proceedings of the ITE 2002 ments, prepared for Florida DOT, August 2004, pp. 71. Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Philadelphia, PA, August 2002.

OCR for page 109
110 29. Cervero, R. "Land Uses and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers," 40. Evaluation of Potential Measures For Achieving Modal Targets, Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 45, 1988; pp. 479491. Cogan, Owens & Cogan; Alta Planning & Design; and David Evans 30. Handy, Susan. "Travel Behavior Issues Related to Neo-Traditional & Associates; Portland Metro, Portland, OR; July 2005, p. 110. Developments--A Review of the Research," 41. "Summary of Traffic Impact Study Guidelines for Selected Texas clearinghouse/docs/udes/handy.pdf, accessed October 30, 2004. Cities," Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., TexITE, November 1993. 31. Steiner, Ruth. "Residential Density and Travel Patterns: Review of 42. "Traffic Impact Studies--Current Practices," The Urban Trans- the Literature," Transportation Research Record 1466, Transportation portation Monitor, August 5 and September 2, 1994. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 43. "Concurrency Management System, Capital Improvements Ele- 1994; pp. 3743. ment," Appendix A, Chapter 9, Section 8 in Capital Improvements 32. Ewing, Reid; Dumbaugh, Eric; and Brown, Mike. "Internalizing Inventory and Analysis, City of Destin, Florida, www.cityofdestin. Travel by Mixing Land Uses," Transportation Research Record 1780, com/pages/community%20development/cp/CH09AGOP060404 Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, final.htm, accessed October 30, 2004. Washington, D.C., 2001, pp.115120; pp. 117118 cited. 44. "Policy For Traffic Impact Studies," City of Tempe, www.tempe. 33. Rutherford, Scott; McCormack, Edward; Wilkinson, Martina. gov/traffic/impacts.htm, accessed October 30, 2004. "Travel Implications of Urban Form: Implications from an Analy- 45. Traffic Impact Study Manual, City of San Diego, July 1998. sis of Two Seattle Area Travel Diaries," 46. Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of Land Developments, City of clearinghouse/docs/udes/mccormack.stm, accessed October 30, San Jose, June 1994, pp. 1516. 2004. 47. Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, California DOT, 34. Lewis, Laurence. "Celebration Traffic Study Reaffirms Benefits of December 2002, p. 4. Mixed-Use Development," HDR Transportline, Vol. 14, No. 2, Sep- 48. INDEX PlanBuilder Planning Support System, Release 9.3, Indicator tember 2004. Dictionary, Criterion Planners, Portland, OR, November 2008; 35. Walters, Gerard; Ewing, Reid; Schroeer, William. "Adjusting Com- pp. 92102. puter Modeling Tools to Capture Response to Smart Growth: or 49. "GRTA DRI Review Package, Technical Guidelines," Georgia Regional `Poking at the Project Like a Lab Rat,'" Transportation Research Transportation Authority, January 14, 2002, pp. 78, www.grta. Record 1722, Transportation Research Board, National Research org/doc/PDF_files/dri_technical_guidelines_final_112901.pdf, Council, Washington, D.C., 2000; pp. 1726. accessed October 30, 2004. 36. Khattak, Asad, and Stone, John. Traditional Neighborhood Devel- 50. Survey Results--Multi-Use Trip Generation: Internal Capture opment Trip Generation Study, FHWA/NC/2005-05, Center for Rates Questionnaire," Zoomerang, Urban & Regional Studies, Department of City and Regional Plan- public_report.zgi?ID=L2263NJNHL4U, accessed October 31, 2004. ning, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 51. Crediting Low-Traffic Developments: Adjusting Site-Level Vehicle February 2005. Trip Generation Using URBEMIS, Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Asso- 37. "Office Worker Spending Patterns," Research Quarterly, Vol. 11, ciates, San Francisco, CA, August 2005. No. 1, International Council of Shopping Centers, New York, NY, 52. Software User's Guide: URBEMIS2002 for Windows With Enhanced Spring 2004. Construction Module, Jones & Stokes Associates, Sacramento, CA, 38. TCRP Report 95: Land Use and Site Design; Chapter 15: Traveler April 2005. Response to Transportation System Changes, Transportation Research 53. Ewing, Reid. "Beyond Density, Mode Choice, and Single Purpose Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Trips," Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 49, Issue 4, 1995, pp. 1921. 39. Lund, Hollie M.; Cervero, Robert; and Wilson, Richard W. "Travel 54. Shared Parking, Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 1983. Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California," 55. Trip Generation Handbook, 1st edition, Institute of Transportation California DOT, January 2004. Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1999.