National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Report 144 Volume 1: Sharing the Costs of Human Services Transportation (2011)
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP)

Citation Manager

Burkhardt, Jon E, Johnson, Cindy, Koffman, David, Garrity, Richard, McGehee, Kathy, Hamme, Susanna S, Burkhardt, Karen, Transportation Research Board. "Should We Continue to Provide Services?." TCRP Report 144 Volume 1: Sharing the Costs of Human Services Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
29
bottomleft bottomright
Page
29
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - How to Use This Toolkit (1-2)
Program Management Improves (3-3)
Funding Requests Are Viewed More Favorably (4-4)
Summary (5-5)
Many Agencies Need Better Cost and Service Accounting (6-6)
Reporting Problems Affect Transportation Coordination Efforts (7-7)
Requirements for Uniform Service Cost Reporting (8-8)
Basic Measures Can Express What's Needed (9-9)
Simple Data Provide Rich Measures (10-10)
More Detailed Data Answer More Questions (11-11)
Current Efforts Often Are Incomplete (12-12)
Summary (13-13)
Four Categories Describe Transportation Services (14-15)
The Four Service Types Explain Typical Service Variations (16-16)
Overall Approach and Accounting Structure (17-17)
A Common Chart of Accounts (18-18)
Different Kinds of Costs (19-20)
Understanding How Costs Are Incurred (21-21)
Summary (22-22)
All Stakeholders Should Pay Their Fair Share (23-27)
Summary (28-28)
Should We Continue to Provide Services? (29-29)
What's the Right Price for Each Purchasing Agency? (30-31)
Summary (32-32)
The Cost Sharing Model (33-34)
Using The Cost Sharing Model (35-41)
Glossary (42-58)
Appendix A - The Regulatory Environment for Federally Funded Transportation Services (59-64)
Appendix B - The Federal Coordinating Council's Vehicle Sharing Policy Statement (65-65)
Appendix C - Examples of Fully Allocated Transportation Cost Accounting Programs (66-67)
Appendix D - Typical Data Collection and Reporting Requirements in Contracts for Transportation Services (68-69)
Appendix E - Depreciation of Capital Expenses (70-71)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (72-72)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 29
CHAPTER 8 Applying the Cost Model to Various Scenarios As noted earlier in this report, the Cost Sharing Model can be used to address a wide variety of issues: · For the purpose of improving internal program management, the model offers more precise measures of what services currently cost to deliver. · For agencies interested in changing their service delivery methods (e.g., purchasing services instead of providing them) it can demonstrate which method is most attractive on a cost per unit of service. · For transportation providers who sell their services to other agencies, the model can be used to help decide what prices to charge for the services they provide. This chapter examines each of these situations. What's the Cost of the Current Services? The Burke Lake Transportation System (BLTS) provides trips for the members of their com- munity. During the last fiscal year · BLTS provided 405,000 miles of service. · BLTS had 35,325 operating hours. · BLTS's expenses were $612,917. · The system provided 63,375 trips. This means that the system-wide averages (total costs divided by each unit of service) were the following: · $17.35 total cost per hour ($612,917 divided by 35,325) · $1.51 total cost per mile ($612,917 divided by 405,000) · $9.67 total cost per trip ($612,917 divided by 63,375) Should We Continue to Provide Services? The Area Agency on Aging (AAA) wants to consider purchasing trips from BLTS instead of pro- viding those trips themselves. The AAA has been providing 25,000 trips per year at an annual cost of $310,000. Their average cost per trip is $12.40; it would make sense for them to purchase trips from BLTS at the lower cost of $9.67 per trip because the AAA could realize a savings of $2.73 per trip, which would amount to $68,250 on an annual basis. Those savings could be used to purchase additional trips for existing riders or to add new riders. 29