Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles ACRP Report 50: Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Safety Areas ACRP Report 17 Volume 2: Airports and the Newest Generation of General Aviation Aircraft, Volume 2: Guidebook Other Related Titles ACRP Report 51: Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards (2011) Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager Shirazi, Hamid, Speir, Richard, Hall, Jim W, Carvalho, Regis, David, Robert, Ayres, Manuel, Huang, Yih-Ru, Transportation Research Board. "References." ACRP Report 51: Risk Assessment Method to Support Modification of Airfield Separation Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. Please select a format: Page 37   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore Page 37 Front Matter (R1-R9) Summary (1-1) Major Challenges Associated with Airfield Separations (2-2) FAA Modification of Standards (3-3) FAA Rationale (4-7) ICAO Rationale (8-11) Veer-Off Accidents and Incidents (12-12) Aircraft Veer-Off Database Organization (13-13) Normal Operations Data (NOD) (14-14) Aircraft Data (15-15) Taxiway and Taxilane Deviation Modeling (16-20) Runway Deviation Modeling (21-27) Methodology Applied to MOS Cases (28-30) Major Achievements (31-31) Recommendations for Future Work (32-33) Glossary of Acronyms (34-35) Definitions (36-36) References (37-38) Appendix A - Risk Assessment Methodology (39-78) Appendix B - Collision Risk Model (79-79) Appendix C - Key Studies on Aircraft Deviation (80-80) Appendix D - List of Veer-Off Accidents and Incidents (81-81) Appendix E - Sample of Normal Operations Data (82-82) Appendix F - Aircraft Database Summary (83-91) Appendix G - Summary of FAA/Boeing Taxiway Deviation Studies (92-92) Appendix H - Analysis of MOS Cases (93-121) Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (122-122)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 37
37 References AOSC (Airport Obstructions Standards Committee). 2005. AOSC Federal Aviation Agency. 1961. Airport Design, Airport Engineering Decision Document #04--Runway/Parallel Taxiway Separation Branch, Airports Division, Bureau of Facilities and Materiel, Standards. Washington, DC: FAA, U.S. DOT. Washington, DC. Ash, A., and M. Schwartz. 1999. "R2: A Useful Measure of Model Per- Flight Safety Foundation (FSF). 2000. ALAR Tool Kit, Briefing Note formance When Predicting a Dichotomous Outcome." Statistics in 8.3­Landing Distances, Flight Safety Digest. Medicine, 18(4), 375­384. Flight Safety Foundation. 2009. "Reducing the Risk of Runway Excur- ATSB (Australian Transport Safety Bureau). 2009. ATSB Transport sions," Report of the Runway Safety Initiative. Safety Report: Aviation Research and Analysis AR-2008-018(1) Hall, J., M. Ayres Jr., D. Wong, A. Appleyard, M. Eddowes, H. Shirazi, R. Final--Runway Excursions--Part 1: A Worldwide Review of Com- Speir, D. Pitfield, O. Selezneva, and T. Puzin. 2008. ACRP Report 3: mercial Jet Aircraft Runway Excursions. Australia. Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Boeing. July 2009. Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Areas. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the Accidents--Worldwide Operations 1959­2008. National Academies. Brown, D. N., and O. O. Thompson. July 1973. "Lateral Distribution of Hathi Trust Digital Library. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/ Aircraft Traffic," Miscellaneous Paper S-73-56. Vicksburg, MS: 005745193. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Soils and HoSang, V. A. February 1975. Field Survey and Analysis of Aircraft Dis- Pavements Laboratory. tribution on Airport Pavements (FAA-RD-74-36). Washington, DC: Civil Aeronautics Authority. 1940. Airport Design Information. Technical FAA, U.S. DOT. Development Division--Airport Section, Washington, DC. Hosmer, D., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. Hobo- Cohen-Nir, D., and R. Marchi. 2003. "Preliminary Analysis of Taxiway ken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Deviation Data and Estimates of Airplane Wingtip Collision Proba- ICAO. 1949. "Aerodromes." Annex 14 to the Chicago Convention, 1st ed. bility." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation ICAO. 1980. "Doc 9274--Manual on the Use of the Collision Risk Research Board, No. 1850, 49­60. Model (CRM) for ILS Operations," 1st ed. David, R. 1973. "Landing Strip/Runway Safety Area Dimensional Cri- ICAO. November 1981. "Aerodromes." Annex 14 to the Chicago Con- teria." Paper presented at Design Standards Meeting (FAA internal vention, 1st ed., Amendment 35. meeting), Dallas, TX, Oct 4, 1973. ICAO. 1990. "Aerodromes, Aerodrome Design and Operations." Eddowes, M., J. Hancox, and A. MacInnes. December 2001. Final Re- International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 14, port on the Risk Analysis in Support of Aerodrome Design Rules-- Volume I, 2nd ed. AEAT/RAIR/RD02325/R/002 Issue 1 (produced for the Norwegian ICAO. 2004. "Aerodromes, Aerodrome Design and Operations." Civil Aviation Authority). Cheshire, UK: AEA Technology. International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 14, FAA. 1959. Airport Design Recommendations, Airport Engineering Volume I, 4th ed. Data Sheet No. 24, Washington, DC. ICAO. 2006a. "Aerodrome Design Manual." Doc 9157-AN/901, Part 1: FAA. 1963. VFR Airports, AC 150/5300-1, Washington, DC. Runways, 3rd ed. FAA. 1968. Utility Airports, AC 150/5300-4A, Washington, DC. ICAO. 2006b. "Aerodromes, Aerodrome Design and Operations." FAA. 1983. Airport Design Standards--Transport Airports, AC 150/ International Standards and Recommended Practices, Annex 14, 5300-12. Washington, DC. Volume I, 5th ed. FAA. 1989. Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design (with IFALPA (International Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations). Ac- changes). Washington, DC. cessed 2008. IFALPA Runway Safety Policy (09POS01). Available from FAA. 2008. "Missed Approach Rates" (DOT-FAA-AFS-450-48). www.ifalpa.org/positionstatements/09POS01_Runway_Safety.pdf. Oklahoma City, OK: Flight Systems Laboratory. NTSB. 2009. Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data--U.S. Air Carrier FAA. 2010. FAA Order 5200.11 (FAA Airports [ARP] Safety Manage- Operations: Calendar Year 2005 (NTSB/ARC-09/01, PB2009-106372, ment System). Notation 7502F). Washington, DC.

OCR for page 38
38 Scholz, F. 2003a. Statistical Extreme Value Analysis of ANC Taxiway tive research and development agreement between the FAA and Centerline Deviations for 747 Aircraft (prepared under a coopera- Boeing). tive research and development agreement between the FAA and Scholz, F. 2005. Statistical Extreme Value Analysis Concerning Risk of Boeing). Wingtip to Wingtip or Fixed Object Collision for Taxiing Large Aircraft Scholz, F. 2003b. Statistical Extreme Value Analysis of JFK Taxiway (prepared under a cooperative research and development agreement Centerline Deviations for 747 Aircraft (prepared under a coopera- between the FAA and Boeing).