National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

HMCRP Report 5: A Guide for Assessing Community Emergency Response Needs and Capabilities for Hazardous Materials Releases (2011)
Hazardous Material Cooperative Research Program (HMCRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Terminology to Represent Emergency Response Capability." HMCRP Report 5: A Guide for Assessing Community Emergency Response Needs and Capabilities for Hazardous Materials Releases. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
11
bottomleft bottomright
Page
11
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Introduction (1-2)
How to Use This Document (3-4)
Balancing Assessment with Planning Capabilities of a Local Emergency Response Organization (5-6)
Defining the Risk Metric (7-7)
Vulnerability (8-8)
Summary of Risk Metric Evaluation Steps (9-10)
Terminology to Represent Emergency Response Capability (11-11)
Defining Emergency Response Capability Tiers (12-14)
Determining Your Teams' Capability Tiers (15-15)
Establishing Your Performance Objectives (16-21)
Material Categorization - Incident Release Types (22-23)
Additional Sources of Information (24-24)
Documentation - Creating a Hazardous Materials Portfolio (25-25)
Transportation Corridors (Mobile Sources) (26-27)
Defining Consequences (28-28)
Estimating Human-Health Consequences (29-30)
Estimating Environmental Consequences (31-31)
Selecting the Consequence Value (32-32)
Emergency Response Capability Factor (33-34)
Response Time Factor (35-35)
Quantifying the Mitigating Effects (36-36)
Adding Risk to the Hazardous Materials Portfolio (37-38)
Hazardous Materials Portfolio Example (39-40)
Chapter 8 - Identifying Shortfalls where Additional/Different Capabilities Are Warranted (41-41)
Reallocating Resources (42-42)
Hazardous Materials Route Restrictions (43-43)
Sharing Emergency Response Capability Assessments (44-44)
Acronyms (45-45)
Appendix A - Information Sources (46-61)
Appendix B - Estimating Vulnerability (62-65)
Appendix C - Estimating the Consequence Term in the Risk Metric Equation (66-70)
Appendix D - Additional Details on Capability Assessment (71-72)
Appendix E - Estimating Emergency Response Times (73-75)
Appendix F - Bibliography (76-77)
Appendix G - Final Report for HMCRP Project 03 (78-108)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (109-109)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 11
CHAPTER 2 Assessing Emergency Response Capability Three types of emergency response teams deal with hazmat: the traditional hazmat response from the public safety community, occupational/industrial manufacturing response, and environmental oil and hazardous substance response. This Guide uses a single framework to assess the capability for all response team types, allowing all resources to be considered equally in your planning process. The information provided in this chapter will enable you, as an emergency response planner, to assign a tier to each team. Team Definition/Organization The most commonly used term when referring to emergency responders is "team." A team can mean different things to different jurisdictions, and a common, consistent framework is needed to measure capability. This Guide provides flexibility in how you define your response teams, allowing you to measure response for individual fire stations, entire departments, industry partners, multijurisdictional agreements, and so on. As an example, jurisdictions and providers may choose to share the financial and management burden of establishing, maintaining, and employing complex emergency response capabilities by integrating specific elements resident in multiple jurisdictions or providers into a strike team or task force, which can be task-organized, reinforced, and/or sustained depending upon the particular situation. In other words, you will measure the emergency response capability for the "teams" in your jurisdiction as you see fit. If you choose to use smaller units, such as individual fire stations, you may find that you need to combine the resources of several of these units to form a "team" with the response capability needed to respond to certain types of incidents. Terminology to Represent Emergency Response Capability To avoid confusion with other terms, such as "levels" or "ratings," specific capabilities are defined in Response Capability Tiers beginning with a standard baseline of operations capabilities. NFPA Standard 472 (2008 Edition) defines Operations Level Responders as those "who respond to hazmat incidents for the purpose of implementing or supporting actions to protect nearby persons, the environment, or property from the effects of the release." Operations Level Respon- ders are the core components of an effective response. Beyond the baseline capability, four Response Capability Tiers are defined that advance from Tier 1, the lowest capability, to Tier 4, the highest capability. The combination of technician- level responders determines whether a hazmat response team meets the requirements of a spe- cific tier as defined in the next section of this Guide. 11