Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 78
78 sets collected by the program to complement the scantiness 5. Dingus, T. SHRP 2 S05 Status Update and Current Design Plans. Pre- of regular state-maintained traffic count and crash data. sented at SHRP2 Safety Research Symposium, Washington, D.C., 2008. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/TomDingus SymposiumPresentation.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2011. References 6. Blanco, M., J. S. Hickman, R. L. Olson, J. L. Bocanegra, R. J. Hanowski, A. Nakata, M. Greening, P. Madison, G. T. Holbrook, and 1. Lerner, N., J. Jenness, J. Singer, S. G. Klauer, S. Lee, M. Donath, D. Bowman. Investigating Critical Incidents, Driver Restart Period, Sleep M. Manser, and M. Ward. An Exploration of Vehicle-Based Monitoring Quantity, and Crash Countermeasures in Commercial Vehicle Opera- of Novice Teen Drivers: Draft Report. Virginia Tech Transportation tions Using Naturalistic Data Collection. FMCSA, 2008. Institute, Blacksburg, Va., 2008. 7. Fitch, G., H. Rakha, M. Arafeh, M. Blanco, S. Gupta, R. Zimmerman, 2. Hickman, J. S., R. R. Knipling, R. L. Olson, M. C. Fumero, M. Blanco, and R. Hanowski. Safety Benefit Evaluation of a Forward Collision and R. J. Hanowski. Phase I--Preliminary Analysis of Data Col- Warning System: Final Report. Report DOT HS 810 910. NHTSA, lected in the Drowsy Driver Warning System Field Operational Test: 2008. Task 5, Preliminary Analysis of Drowsy Driver Warning System Field 8. International Transport Forum. Towards Zero: Ambitious Road Safety Operational Test Data. NHTSA, 2005. Targets and the Safe System Approach. Organisation for Economic 3. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Auto- Co-operation and Development, 2008. www.internationaltransport motive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test Report: forum.org/Pub/pdf/08TowardsZeroE.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2011. Methodology and Results. Report DOT HS 809 900 NHTSA, 2005. 9. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Depart- 4. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Road ment of Transportation. About Intelligent Transportation Systems. Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology www.its.dot.gov/its_program/about_its.htm. Accessed May 17, and Results. NHTSA, 2006. 2011.