National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 673: A Manual for Design of Hot-Mix Asphalt with Commentary (2011)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Using HMA Tools to Design HMA Mixes with RAP." NCHRP Report 673: A Manual for Design of Hot-Mix Asphalt with Commentary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
151
bottomleft bottomright
Page
151
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (1-3)
Materials Used in Making Asphalt Concrete (4-4)
Asphalt Concrete Pavements (5-6)
How Asphalt Concrete Pavements Fail (7-9)
Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (10-11)
HMA Mix Design Methods (12-14)
Chapter 3 - Asphalt Binders (15-16)
Performance Grading - Test Methods (17-21)
Performance Grading - Specification (22-23)
Critical Temperatures, Specification Values, and Reliability (24-25)
Practical Selection of PG Binder Grades for HMA Mix Design (26-27)
Aggregate Particle Size Distribution (28-32)
Aggregate Specific Gravity and Absorption (33-37)
Aggregate Specification Properties (38-42)
Source Aggregate Properties (43-45)
Composition Factors (46-52)
Mixture-Specific Gravity (53-55)
Volumetric Analysis (56-64)
Chapter 6 - Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (65-65)
Mixture Composition and Performance (66-70)
Laboratory Testing (71-81)
Performance Predictions Using the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) (82-90)
Pavement Structure and Construction (91-94)
Important Factors in Mix Selection (95-97)
Recommended Mix Types (98-100)
Other Mix Design Methods (101-105)
Overview of Design Method (106-106)
Step 1. Gather Information (107-107)
Step 2. Select Asphalt Binder (108-110)
Step 4. Select Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (111-111)
Step 5. Determine Target VMA and Design Air Void Content (112-113)
Step 8. Proportion Aggregates for Trial Mixtures (114-123)
Step 9. Calculate Trial Mix Proportions by Weight and Check Dust/Binder Ratio (124-127)
Step 10. Evaluate and Refine Trial Mixtures (128-144)
Step 11. Compile Mix Design Report (145-147)
General Mixture Design Considerations for RAP (148-149)
Overview of the Mixture Design Process with RAP (150-150)
Using HMA Tools to Design HMA Mixes with RAP (151-151)
RAP Sampling (152-152)
Blending and Variability (153-160)
RAP Aggregate Properties (161-163)
RAP Binder Properties (164-169)
Handling RAP Materials in the Laboratory (170-173)
Overview of GGHMA Mix Design Procedure (174-175)
Step 1 - Materials Selection (176-178)
Step 2 - Trial Gradations (179-187)
Step 3 - Selection of Optimum Gradation (188-188)
Step 5 - Conduct Performance Testing (189-190)
Trouble Shooting GGHMA Mix Designs (191-193)
Chapter 11 - Design of Open-Graded Mixtures (194-194)
Step 1 - OGFC Materials Selection (195-197)
Step 2 - Trial Gradations (198-202)
Step 4 - Selection of Optimum Asphalt Binder Content (203-204)
Trouble Shooting PFC Mix Designs (205-206)
Adjusting Laboratory HMA Mix Designs for Plant Production (207-210)
Quality Control of HMA (211-224)
Commentary to the Mix Design Manual for Hot Mix Asphalt (225-225)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (226-226)
Chapter 2 - Background (227-227)
Chapter 3 - Asphalt Binders (228-228)
Chapter 4 - Aggregates (229-230)
Chapter 5 - Mixture Volumetric Composition (231-231)
Chapter 6 - Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (232-239)
Chapter 7 - Selection of Asphalt Concrete Mix Type (240-240)
Chapter 8 - Design of Dense-Graded HMA Mixtures (241-252)
Chapter 9 - Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (253-264)
Chapter 10 - Design of Gap-Graded HMA Mixtures (265-265)
Chapter 11 - Design of Open-Graded Mixtures (266-266)
Chapter 12 - Field Adjustments and Quality Assurance of HMA Mixtures (267-270)
References (271-273)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (274-274)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 151
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement 151 When RAP is used in HMA, the first step in the mixture design process is to obtain samples of the RAP. Samples should be taken from random locations in each RAP pile. A portion of each sample is then used to determine the average and standard deviation of the binder content and gradation. This information is used to estimate feasible RAP contents that will satisfy gradation and vari- ability requirements. The remaining portion of the RAP samples for each stockpile are combined to provide (1) a representative sample for determining RAP binder and aggregate properties and (2) material for preparing specimens for the volumetric design and performance analysis. If the desired RAP content exceeds 15% or a limit specified by the agency, the properties of the RAP binder are analyzed and used to create a blending chart for the new and RAP binder. This blending chart can be used to determine the maximum RAP content of a specified new binder to ensure the blended binder meets the specified grade. Or it can be used to determine the grade of new binder needed for the desired RAP content to ensure that the blended binder meets the specified grade. If more than one RAP stockpile will be used in a mixture, the binder analysis is performed using a blended sample of the RAP stockpiles. The results of the variability and RAP binder analyses are used to select the final RAP content and performance grade of the new binder that will be used in the mixture. The volumetric design and performance analysis then proceed in the same manner as for a mixture produced with all new materials. The only difference is the binder content in the RAP stockpiles must be accounted for when computing binder contents and preparing specimens. A Note on General Methods of Handling RAP This manual assumes that RAP will be collected and stored in discrete stockpiles, with each stockpile representing a single RAP source or several very similar and carefully handled RAP sources. There are several good reasons for handling RAP in this way. Perhaps most impor- tantly, it ensures that each stockpile is relatively uniform in character and will not vary too much as the stockpile is depleted during production. It makes characterizing the RAP simpler and more accurate, since the variability in the RAP source is minimized. Some agencies require that RAP be handled in this way and place restrictions on the size of RAP stockpiles that can be used at HMA plants. However, there are other ways to handle RAP in HMA plants. One approach gaining popularity is to fully process the RAP--to sieve and blend it into carefully controlled size fractions which are then stored and handled in much the same way as aggregates. This approach has many advantages, but because it is relatively new it is not directly addressed in this manual. Many aspects of the mix design process, such as determining binder grades for mix designs containing RAP, will be essentially the same regardless of how the RAP is handled. One important aspect of the mix design process that will depend on how RAP materials are handled at the plant is the effect of RAP variability on the allowable RAP content. Producers using highly processed RAP and other alternative approaches to handling RAP should rely on their experience and judgment in determining the maximum amount of RAP that can be used in HMA mix designs without unacceptably increasing production variability. Using HMA Tools to Design HMA Mixes with RAP Many of the equations used in the design of HMA mixes containing RAP are complex, and the calculations required to properly complete such designs can be tedious and prone to error. The HMA Tools spreadsheet has been constructed to simplify the incorporation of RAP into dense-graded HMA mix designs. Technicians and engineers need not be overly concerned with the mathematics involved in incorporating RAP into HMA mix designs, but technicians and engineers