Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 170
170 A Manual for Design of Hot Mix Asphalt with Commentary
Example Problem 9-6. Calculating the Maximum Allowable RAP Content
Given an HMA Design with a Specific New Asphalt Binder
The RAP binder from Example 4 will be used in an HMA mixture. A PG 64-22
binder with excellent low temperature characteristics is available, and the pro-
ducer would like to use this binder in mixtures with RAP because of limited
binder storage at the plant. The RAP has a binder content of 4.4%, and the HMA
mixture has a binder content of 5.2%. Determine the amount of RAP that can be
used with this binder to meet the specification requirements for PG 70-22. The
critical temperatures for the new binder, based on historical data provided by the
supplier, are Tc(High) = 66.0 °C, Tc(Int) = 19.3 °C, and Tc(Low) = -17.3 °C.
Solution
Much of the required information for this problem is the same as Example 5 and
is entered in HMA Tools in the same way. The required continuous grade temper-
atures for a PG 70-22 are Tc(High) = 70.0 °C, Tc(Int) = 28.0 °C, and Tc(Low) = -22.0 °C;
these values are different from those for the PG 64-22 required in the previous
example and should be entered in cells C6:C8. The critical temperatures for the
new binder (PG 64-22) are entered in cells C44:C45 and C47.
The minimum and maximum RAP contents, as a weight percentage of the total
RAP plus aggregate weight, are given in cells C64 and C65, respectively: 33.5%
minimum and 38.1% maximum. For the actual mix design, a value of 35% RAP
would be a good choice. Note that for RAP contents of 15% and lower, the effects
of RAP on binder grading need not be considered. Therefore, if HMA Tools calcu-
lates that less than 15% RAP should be used in a mix because of binder grading
considerations, a value of 15% is reported in cell C64. In a similar way, RAP con-
tents above 50% are discouraged because of practical difficulties in handling such
a quantity of RAP in many plants, so that the highest value HMA Tools will report
in cell C65 is 50%, regardless of the value calculated on the basis of binder grading.
Handling RAP Materials in the Laboratory
RAP materials must be handled differently than new aggregates when preparing specimens for
volumetric design and performance analysis. First, the weight of the binder contained in the RAP
must be accounted for during laboratory batching. Second, the RAP must be heated gently during
the preparation of laboratory specimens to avoid changing the properties of the RAP binder.
Recommended methods for handing RAP are discussed below.
Laboratory Batching
A supply of RAP for the preparation of laboratory specimens is obtained by combining the
main portion of the individual samples for each stockpile and thoroughly mixing the combined
material. Material for each RAP stockpile should be kept separate. Prior to batching, the RAP
should be dried in an oven at 60 °C (140 °F) to remove field moisture. Laboratory batching is
based on the weight of the aggregate, while the stockpile percentages used to produce the HMA
at the hot-mix plant are based on total weight. When the HMA is composed of all new aggregates,
the stockpile percentages can be used directly. However, when RAP stockpiles are used, the
weight of the binder contained in the RAP must be accounted for and stockpile percentages based
OCR for page 170
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement 171
on the total weight of aggregate must be computed and used for laboratory batching. The required
analysis was discussed earlier in the Blending and Variability section of this chapter. Example 1
illustrated the required computations.
When preparing laboratory specimens, new aggregate stockpiles should be separated into the
following size fractions:
· Passing 37.5 mm--Retained 25.0 mm
· Passing 25.0 mm--Retained 19.0 mm
· Passing 19.0 mm--Retained 12.5 mm
· Passing 12.5 mm--Retained 9.5 mm
· Passing 9.5 mm--Retained 4.75 mm
· Passing 4.75 mm--Retained 2.36 mm
· Passing 2.36 mm
Because of the relatively large amount of fine material in most RAP, it is not necessary to
separate the RAP into size fractions for laboratory batching. The amount of each size fraction of
new aggregate needed for a laboratory batch is computed directly from the proportions based
on the total weight of aggregate. The amount of each RAP stockpile needed for a laboratory batch
must be increased to account for the weight of binder in the RAP using Equation 9-4:
M RAPAGG
M RAP = × 100 (9-4)
(100 - PbRAP )
where
MRAP = mass of RAP required for the laboratory batch, g
MRAPAGG = mass of RAP aggregate required for the laboratory batch, g
PbRAP = RAP binder content, wt %
The mass of binder provided by the RAP is then
Pb
M RAPBINDER = RAP × M RAP (9-5)
100
where
MRAPBINDER = mass of RAP binder in the laboratory batch, g
MRAP = mass of RAP in the laboratory batch, g
PbRAP = RAP binder content, wt %
HMA Tools can be used to perform these and all other required calculations for determining
batch weights of mix designs containing RAP. Before determining batch weights for a mix
design, all of the pertinent mix design data should be entered on various worksheets, including
"General," "Binders," "RAP_Binders," "Aggregates," "RAP_Aggregates," and "Trial_Batches."
Other data should be entered in the worksheet "Batch." For cylindrical specimens, the diameter and
height of up to three different-sized specimens are entered in cells F3:F5 and G3:G5, respectively.
The numbers of specimens needed for each of these three different cylinder sizes are entered in
cells I3:I5. The dimensions and number of specimens for up to two differently shaped beam-shaped
specimens are entered in a similar way in cells F8:I9. If desired, an extra amount of loose mix
can be entered in cell K3 (in grams)--this might be material needed for theoretical maximum
specific gravity determinations. In addition to this loose mix, an extra percentage of material can
be specified in cell O7. This represents a contingency, to ensure that enough material is available
for the required specimens; 5 or 10% should normally be entered here. The user must also
make sure to specify the trial batch number for the batch calculations in cell O1; this would be
a number from 1 to 7, corresponding to the trial batch numbers in the worksheet "Trial_Batch."
OCR for page 170
172 A Manual for Design of Hot Mix Asphalt with Commentary
HMA Tools will calculate batch weights for each aggregate and RAP material, providing a
complete breakdown for coarse material (retained on the 2.36-mm sieve) and three different
breakdowns for fine aggregate: complete, partial (in two-sieve fractions), and with no break-
down. HMA Tools also calculates the amount of new binder required--the amount of binder
contributed by the RAP is automatically accounted for. The worksheet "Batch" is conveniently
designed to print out a one page report that can be used to weigh out materials in the laboratory.
The last example in this chapter shows how HMA Tools is used to calculate batch weights for
mix designs containing RAP.
Example Problem 9-7. Laboratory Batching for an HMA Mix Design
Containing RAP
Laboratory specimens of the mixture from Example 1 will be prepared. The aggre-
gate gradations were given previously in Table 9-1. The mixture will be produced
using three new aggregate stockpiles, hydrated lime, and two RAP stockpiles. The
stockpiles will be combined in the following proportions: 29% of Aggregate 1, 40%
of Aggregate 2, 10% of Aggregate 3, 1% lime, 10% Coarse RAP, and 10% Fine RAP.
The target VMA for the mix is 16.0% and the target air void content is 4.0%. Deter-
mine batch weights for making two 150-mm-diameter by 100-mm-tall cylindrical
specimens with 2,000 grams of extra material for performing a theoretical maxi-
mum specific gravity test. Allow 5% extra material for contingency. The fine aggre-
gate fraction (passing the 2.36-mm sieve) will not be further broken down, and the
RAP will not be broken down at all. Calculate weights for this trial batch.
Solution
The aggregate and RAP data are entered into the worksheets "Aggregates" and
"RAP_Aggregates" as for Example Problem 1. In the worksheet "Batch," 1 should
be entered for batch number in cell O1. Dimensions for the cylindrical specimen
are entered in cells F3:G3, and 2 is entered for the number of specimens in cell I3.
The amount of loose mix (2,000 g) is entered in cell K3, and 5% is entered in cell
O7 for the desired amount of extra mix. After pressing shift+F9 to calculate, the
batch weights appear on the lower portion of the spreadsheet. Table 9-10 sum-
marizes the batch weights calculated by HMA Tools for this example.
Table 9-10. Summary of batch
weights for example 7.
Material Total Fraction Batch
wt., g Mm wt, g
Aggregate 1 12.5 9.5 267
9.5 4.75 2,136
4.75 2.36 386
- 2.36 179
Aggregate 2 9.5 4.75 82
4,091 4.75 2.36 1,514
-2.36 2,495
Aggregate 3 9.5 4.75 102
1,023 4.75 2.36 389
-2.36 532
Lime 102 All 102
CRAP 1,022 All 1,022
FRAP 1,023 All 1,023
New Binder 506 All 506
Total 10,735
OCR for page 170
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement 173
Heating RAP
Exercise care when preparing laboratory specimens with RAP to avoid changing the properties
of the RAP binder. The RAP should be heated for the shortest time possible to reach the mixing
temperature. Heat the RAP for no more than 2 hours in a separate oven set to 110°C (230°F).
Higher temperatures and longer heating times have been shown to change the properties of
some RAP. The new aggregates should be heated from 10 to 20 °C above the mixing temperature
before combining with the RAP and new binder. The mixture should be mixed, short-term aged,
and compacted in the usual manner.
Bibliography
AASHTO Standards
M 320, Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder
R 29, Grading or Verifying the Performance Grade of an Asphalt Binder
T 2, Standard Method of Test for Sampling Aggregates
T 248, Standard Method of Test for Reducing Samples of Aggregate to Testing Size
T 308, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the
Ignition Method
T 30, Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregates
T 164, Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen for Bituminous Paving Mixtures
T 209, Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Bituminous Paving
Mixtures
T 84, Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate
T 85, Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate
T 176, Standard Method of Test for Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test
T 319, Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures
T 240, Standard Method of Test for Effect of Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test)
T 315, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic
Shear Rheometer (DSR)
T 313, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending
Beam Rheometer (BBR)
Other Standards
ASTM D 5821, Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate
ASTM D 4791, Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in
Coarse Aggregate
Other Publications
McDaniel, R., and R. M. Anderson (2001) NCHRP Report 452: Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
in the Superpave Mix Design Method: Technician's Manual, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC,
58 pp.
McDaniel, R. S., et al. (2000) NCHRP Web-Only Document 30: Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
in the Superpave Mix Design Method: Contractor's Final Report, TRB, National Research Council, Washington,
D.C., October, 461 pp.
NAPA (2007) NAPA Quality Improvement Series 124: Designing HMA Mixtures with High RAP Content, NAPA,
Lanham, MD
NAPA (1996) Recycling Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement, Information Series 123, NAPA, Lanham, MD
NAPA (2000) Recycling Practices for HMA, Special Report 187, NAPA, Lanham, MD, 2000.
FHWA (1998) "User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Materials in Pavement Construction" FHWA-RD-97-148,
FHWA, Washington, DC.