National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 673: A Manual for Design of Hot-Mix Asphalt with Commentary (2011)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Chapter 6 - Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures." NCHRP Report 673: A Manual for Design of Hot-Mix Asphalt with Commentary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
65
bottomleft bottomright
Page
65
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (1-3)
Materials Used in Making Asphalt Concrete (4-4)
Asphalt Concrete Pavements (5-6)
How Asphalt Concrete Pavements Fail (7-9)
Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (10-11)
HMA Mix Design Methods (12-14)
Chapter 3 - Asphalt Binders (15-16)
Performance Grading - Test Methods (17-21)
Performance Grading - Specification (22-23)
Critical Temperatures, Specification Values, and Reliability (24-25)
Practical Selection of PG Binder Grades for HMA Mix Design (26-27)
Aggregate Particle Size Distribution (28-32)
Aggregate Specific Gravity and Absorption (33-37)
Aggregate Specification Properties (38-42)
Source Aggregate Properties (43-45)
Composition Factors (46-52)
Mixture-Specific Gravity (53-55)
Volumetric Analysis (56-64)
Chapter 6 - Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (65-65)
Mixture Composition and Performance (66-70)
Laboratory Testing (71-81)
Performance Predictions Using the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) (82-90)
Pavement Structure and Construction (91-94)
Important Factors in Mix Selection (95-97)
Recommended Mix Types (98-100)
Other Mix Design Methods (101-105)
Overview of Design Method (106-106)
Step 1. Gather Information (107-107)
Step 2. Select Asphalt Binder (108-110)
Step 4. Select Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (111-111)
Step 5. Determine Target VMA and Design Air Void Content (112-113)
Step 8. Proportion Aggregates for Trial Mixtures (114-123)
Step 9. Calculate Trial Mix Proportions by Weight and Check Dust/Binder Ratio (124-127)
Step 10. Evaluate and Refine Trial Mixtures (128-144)
Step 11. Compile Mix Design Report (145-147)
General Mixture Design Considerations for RAP (148-149)
Overview of the Mixture Design Process with RAP (150-150)
Using HMA Tools to Design HMA Mixes with RAP (151-151)
RAP Sampling (152-152)
Blending and Variability (153-160)
RAP Aggregate Properties (161-163)
RAP Binder Properties (164-169)
Handling RAP Materials in the Laboratory (170-173)
Overview of GGHMA Mix Design Procedure (174-175)
Step 1 - Materials Selection (176-178)
Step 2 - Trial Gradations (179-187)
Step 3 - Selection of Optimum Gradation (188-188)
Step 5 - Conduct Performance Testing (189-190)
Trouble Shooting GGHMA Mix Designs (191-193)
Chapter 11 - Design of Open-Graded Mixtures (194-194)
Step 1 - OGFC Materials Selection (195-197)
Step 2 - Trial Gradations (198-202)
Step 4 - Selection of Optimum Asphalt Binder Content (203-204)
Trouble Shooting PFC Mix Designs (205-206)
Adjusting Laboratory HMA Mix Designs for Plant Production (207-210)
Quality Control of HMA (211-224)
Commentary to the Mix Design Manual for Hot Mix Asphalt (225-225)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (226-226)
Chapter 2 - Background (227-227)
Chapter 3 - Asphalt Binders (228-228)
Chapter 4 - Aggregates (229-230)
Chapter 5 - Mixture Volumetric Composition (231-231)
Chapter 6 - Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures (232-239)
Chapter 7 - Selection of Asphalt Concrete Mix Type (240-240)
Chapter 8 - Design of Dense-Graded HMA Mixtures (241-252)
Chapter 9 - Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (253-264)
Chapter 10 - Design of Gap-Graded HMA Mixtures (265-265)
Chapter 11 - Design of Open-Graded Mixtures (266-266)
Chapter 12 - Field Adjustments and Quality Assurance of HMA Mixtures (267-270)
References (271-273)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (274-274)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 65
CHAPTER 6 Evaluating the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures This chapter presents an introduction to evaluating the performance of HMA mixtures in pavement systems. It provides mixture designers with a concise compilation of information relating HMA properties to the failure mechanisms discussed in Chapter 2: · Rutting and permanent deformation · Fatigue cracking · Low-temperature cracking · Moisture damage · Durability HMA performance is strongly influenced by the composition of the mixture and the in-place density. The effect of binder properties, aggregate properties, and mixture volumetric properties on performance, which serves as the basis for the mixture design criteria in Chapters 8 and 10, are discussed. The important role of field compaction in the performance of dense-graded and SMA mixtures cannot be over emphasized. Marginally designed mixtures may perform adequately when properly compacted, but even the best designed mixture will not perform adequately when poorly compacted. In recent years there has been a growing interest in using performance testing and performance prediction models in HMA mixture design and acceptance. For higher traffic level designs, the three-level Superpave mixture design and analysis system developed during the Strategic Highway Research Program included a series of performance tests and models to evaluate the expected performance of an HMA mixture. Unfortunately due to complexity, high equipment costs, and the lack of field calibration for the models, the mixture analysis portion of this system was not fully implemented. Over the last 15 years, additional progress in performance testing has been made, and recently the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) has been completed and made available to the profession. The MEPDG includes field-calibrated performance prediction models for rutting and cracking that can be used to predict the perfor- mance of an HMA mixture in a particular pavement section. Although performance is directly addressed by the mixture design processes presented in this manual through the material selection and volumetric criteria used in design, some agencies and mixture designers may desire confirmation through performance testing and modeling. This chapter also discusses various performance tests that can be used to assess HMA mixture per- formance and presents an introduction to the MEPDG and how this software can be used to complement the mixture design process. 65