Click for next page ( 37


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 36
36 Bibliography California Department of Finance. State's Full Cost Recovery Policy. Infrastructure Outsourcing: Leveraging Concrete, Steel, and Asphalt with Presentation, August 2002. Public-Private Partnerships. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Cambridge Systematics, Inc. VTrans Asset Management Vision and Angeles, California, 2000. Work Plan. Vermont Agency of Transportation, 2002. In-House Versus Consultant Design Cost Study. Louisiana Department of Circular A-87: Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Gov- Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1998. ernments. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, Maintenance & Traffic FY 08 Expenditure Report. Missouri Department D.C., 2004. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a087/a87_ of Transportation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2008. 2004.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2009. Maintenance Contract Manual. Texas Department of Transportation, Competing for Highway Maintenance: Lessons for Washington State. Austin, Texas, 2006. Washington Policy Center, Seattle, Washington, 1998. Maintenance Management Information System (MMIS) User Manual. Competing for Highway Maintenance: Lessons for Washington State Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2002. Part II. Washington Policy Center, Seattle, Washington, 1999. Maintenance Management Manual. Texas Department of Transporta- Competitive Contracting and Privatization Options in Wisconsin State tion, Austin, Texas, 2008. Government. Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Thiensville, Wis- Maintenance Work Operating Numbers. Washington State DOT, consin, April 2004. Olympia, Washington, 2007. Competitive Neutrality: Ensuring a Level Playing Field in Managed Com- NCHRP Web Document 59: Outsourcing of State DOT Capital Program petitions. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, Delivery Functions [Project 20-24(18)]. Transportation Research 1998. Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Ninety-Seventh Annual Report. Alabama Department of Transporta- Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Missouri Department of tion, Montgomery, Alabama, Fiscal Year 2008. Transportation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2008. Outsourcing Versus In-House Highway Maintenance: Cost Comparison Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June and Decision Factors. South Carolina Department of Transporta- 30, 2008. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ari- tion, Columbia, South Carolina, 2006. zona, 2008. Performance Guideline PeGS. Arizona DOT, Phoenix, Arizona, 2002. Contracting for Road and Highway Maintenance. Reason Public Policy Proposed Administrative Indirect Cost Rates for Use During Septem- Institute, Los Angeles, California, 2003. ber 1, 2008 Through August 31, 2009. Texas Department of Trans- Department of Transportation Highways and Rail Programs Perfor- portation, Austin, Texas, 2008. mance Audit. State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Re- Review of VDOT's Administration of the Interstate Asset Management view Committee, Olympia, Washington, 1998. Contract. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission of the Evaluation of Transportation Organization Outsourcing: Decision-making Virginia General Assembly, Richmond, Virginia, 2001. Criteria for Outsourcing Opportunities. Midwest Regional University Spaulding, W., MATS: Managing Assets on Transportation Systems. 2008. Transportation Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2002. Synopsis of WSDOT's Review of Highway Maintenance "Outsourcing" Field Operations Manual. Alabama Department of Transportation, Experience. Washington State Department of Transportation, Montgomery, Alabama. Olympia, Washington, 2004. FY 2007 Indirect Cost Rate Proposal. State of Washington Department TxDOT FIMS Report, Maintenance Direct and Indirect Expenditures by of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, 2006. Activity,FY2009.TexasDepartmentofTransportation, Austin, Texas. Highway Robbery: How Contracting-Out the Design, Engineering, Inspec- TxDOT Glossary. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, tion & Management of Federally-Funded Transportation Projects 2010. Produces Problems with Cost, Quality, Safety & Accountability. Na- The Use of Highway Maintenance Management Systems in State Highway tional Association of State Highway and Transportation Unions, Agencies. Applied Pavement Technology, Inc., Urbana, Illinois, 2006. Sacramento, California, 2002. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Policy Manual. Subj: Assets Capi- How to Compare Costs Between In-House and Contracted Services. talization, Identifier 4020, August 2, 2001. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, 1993. Warne, T. R. NCHRP Synthesis 313: State DOT Outsourcing and Private- Indirect Cost Allocation Plan FY 20082009. Office of Comptroller, Sector Utilization. Transportation Research Board of the National Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, 2008. Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.