National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 11: Truck Drayage Productivity Guide (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Implications for Stakeholders." NCFRP Report 11: Truck Drayage Productivity Guide. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
38
bottomleft bottomright
Page
38
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Overview of Port Drayage (1-2)
Purpose and Organization of This Guidebook (3-3)
Additional Port Drayage Resources (4-4)
Port Drayage Transactions (5-5)
Marine Container Terminals (6-7)
Import Drayage Process (8-9)
Empty Return Process (10-10)
Drayage Subprocesses (11-15)
Data and Information Needs (16-16)
Marine Terminal Information Systems (17-19)
Drayage Company Data (20-21)
Local and Regional Traffic Data (22-22)
Surveys (23-27)
Terminal Webcam Data Collection (28-30)
Special Studies (31-32)
Drayage Problems (33-35)
Impacts (36-36)
Solutions (37-37)
Implications for Stakeholders (38-38)
Turn Time Distributions (39-39)
Turn Time Components (40-41)
Suboptimization (42-43)
Need for Buffers (44-44)
Turn Time Solutions (45-46)
Entrance Gate Issues (47-47)
Driver/Truck Arrivals (48-48)
Gate Queuing Solutions (49-52)
Gate Capacity and Working Hours (53-53)
Trouble Tickets (54-57)
Gate Processing Solutions (58-63)
Chassis Logistics (64-64)
Chassis Equipment Issues (65-66)
Chassis Flips (67-67)
Chassis Supply Solutions (68-70)
Container Yard Congestion Impacts (71-71)
Marine Terminal Disruptions (72-74)
Container Yard Solutions (75-75)
Extra Empty Equipment Moves (76-79)
Extra Trip Solutions (80-81)
Port-Area and Port Access Congestion (82-85)
Road and Highway Congestion Solutions (86-87)
Overview (88-92)
Data Sources (93-93)
National Drayage Cost and Emissions Estimates (94-94)
Impacts of Drayage Bottlenecks (95-96)
Implications (97-97)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (98-98)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 38
38 Truck Drayage Productivity Guide · Regular meetings and other communication within the port community, including port staff, terminal operators, drayage firms, ocean carriers, customers, and other stakeholders as required; · Sufficient terminal resources and capabilities to simultaneously serve vessels and trucks; · Customer preferences for ocean carriers with good drayage transaction records; · Reduction in port-area and urban street and highway congestion; and · Improvements to legacy marine terminals. Implications for Stakeholders A review of the matrices, the list of problems, and the list of solutions suggests roles for all of the stakeholders in containerized shipping and port operations as follows: · Port authorities can improve communications, support legacy terminal improvements, coor- dinate appointment systems, and participate in port-area congestion mitigation. · Marine container terminals can improve gate processing, reduce operating system "glitches," stagger break times to prevent gate closures, extend gate hours as required, and increase capa- bilities to simultaneously serve vessels and trucks. · Drayage firms can increase their driver training effort, maximize use of port and terminal cargo clearance systems, and work with customers to reduce booking errors. · Ocean carriers can rationalize empty returns, reduce booking errors and exceptions, and sup- port terminal improvements and extended gates. · Customers can reduce booking and paperwork errors, and use experienced, knowledgeable drayage firms. · Local and regional planners can mitigate congestion on port-area streets and highways. Although each stakeholder group can achieve marginal improvements working indepen- dently, large-scale solutions will require coordinated efforts by multiple parties.