Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 49
Marine Terminal Gate Queuing 49 Figure 62. Arrival patterns at Bayport, Port of Houston. Cargo flows and transaction volumes at most marine terminals are inherently uneven. On ves- sel arrival days, a surge of import boxes passes from the vessel into the terminal. Import customers typically want their goods quickly, so there is a surge of drayage activity as well. Exports tend to arrive at the terminal during the week prior to vessel arrival, peaking before the outbound book- ing cutoff. Once the vessel is gone, activity declines. Marine terminal gate hours vary, but most are roughly 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. Some terminals close the gates during lunch breaks, some keep them open. Customer hours also vary, but are commonly 8 to 5. Customers tend to prefer receiving imports in the morning and shipping exports in the afternoon. Although marine terminal gate hours and container shipping and receiving hours may seem to align, in practice they often do not because of the time and distance between them. A drayage driver first in line at 7 A.M. can expect to leave the marine terminal with an export load by about 7:30 A.M. If the customer is 2 hours away, delivery will not be until 9:30 A.M. On the export side, a shipper 2 hours away must ship by 1:30 P.M. to be reasonably sure of getting the container in the gate by 4 P.M. For that shipper to receive at 8 A.M. and ship at 5 P.M., the marine terminal would have to be open from 5:30 A.M. to 7:30 P.M. Since both drayage firms and their drivers are usually paid by the move, they have an incentive to make as many moves as possible. A driver who can start his first move at 8 A.M. by being in line at 7 A.M. has an opportunity to make more moves and earn more revenue than a driver who waits for the congestion to clear and starts his first move at 10 A.M. The second driver has a faster turn time on his first trip, but the first driver may earn more by making more trips in the day. Although many distribution centers (DCs) operate beyond the standard business day, most cargo is still shipped between 8 A.M. and 5 P.M. Gate Queuing Solutions The Gate Queuing Dilemma For all the reasons above, gate queuing is difficult to reduce, much less eliminate. In California, legislation forced San Pedro Bay terminals to adopt appointment systems and develop PierPASS (described later) to avoid being subject to massive fines for long queues. As of
OCR for page 50
50 Truck Drayage Productivity Guide 2010, however, trade growth and cost-based reductions in gate hours have led to massive queues when San Pedro Bay terminals change from fee-based to free entry each evening at 6 P.M. The uneven pace of truck arrival and existing labor rules presents terminal operators with a dilemma: to keep gates fluid and truck queues short, the terminal operators would have to hire sub- stantially more labor than is actually required to handle the trucks. In an industry characterized by relentless cost pressure, the decision will often favor the terminal operator's budget at the expense of the drayage drivers. Appointment Systems Appointment systems are largely confined to Southern California at present. They have a mixed record there but hold the potential for wider application and are of interest to other ports and oper- ators. Appointment systems have the following twin purpose: · To allow drayage firms to make efficient dispatching plans with reduced driver queue times and · To let marine terminals control workloads, thereby reducing drayage congestion and delay. Several Southern California appointment systems were tried in response to threats of legislation over driver queue times. Some have fallen into disuse, but the remaining systems have been improved and refined. Maersk has subsequently adopted an appointment system at its new termi- nals in Virginia and Mobile, Alabama. That system, however, presently uses 4-hour appointment windows and serves primarily as a planning tool for the terminal operators. Because a driver can sometimes make multiple trips in a 4-hour window, there have been occasions when it was not clear which appointment the driver was keeping. Most appointment systems have been designed with little input from drayage firms or drivers. There are a number of issues that have yet to be resolved in a uniform system, including the following: · How available appointment windows will be allocated, · How the gate will differentiate between drivers with and without appointments, · How drivers without appointments will be handled, · What obligations the terminal has to a driver who makes and keeps an appointment, · What obligations a driver has to a terminal if he breaks an appointment, and · Whether the appointment system will be used throughout the port. The variability of over-the-road and urban transit times, discussed at length in Chapter 9, places a limit on the precision of appointment systems. At one extreme, 4-hour windows do not struc- ture or regulate the flow of trucks. At the other extreme, 15-minute windows could not be main- tained in ordinary operations due to the inherent variability of both drayage and terminal operations. The tight delivery windows characteristic of just-in-time replenishment systems are kept by letting trucks idle nearby until the delivery window opens, which would defeat the pur- pose in the marine terminal environment. PierPASS Southern California ports generate large volumes of truck traffic that contribute to congestion and emissions in the Los Angeles basin. To ease the burden of international cargo delivered locally on local highways and to further improve air quality, the PierPASS system was instituted. The goal of PierPASS has been to encourage the movement of containers in off-peak hours. Since July 2005, all marine terminals in the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach have offered OffPeak shifts on nights and weekends. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $50 per 20-ft equivalent unit (TEU), or $100 per 40-ft container, is assessed on containers drayed through the ports during peak daytime hours, with
OCR for page 51
Marine Terminal Gate Queuing 51 certain exceptions. At present, between 35%40% of all cargo moving through the ports is mov- ing under the OffPeak Program. The traffic mitigation fee funds the extra labor for the OffPeak gate shifts. PierPASS fees are implemented through RFID tags and alternative forms of driver and company identification. For drayage companies that routinely do business at the ports, the system functions smoothly, operating in the background and not causing exceptions at the gates. For occasional users, the system can cause delays and disputes. Because PierPASS fees are not assessed after 6 P.M., drayage drivers wait outside terminal gates until that time. On busy days, this situation results in congested gates at, and shortly after, 6 P.M. The OffPeak fee is charged to the customer, not the trucker, so it is presumably the customer who has required the driver to queue up at 6 P.M. rather than enter the gate and pay the fee. Drayage firms and drivers are not ordinarily compensated more for waiting, so the driver has implicitly accepted a delay so the customer can save money. On the other hand, the PierPASS Program is predicated in part on the assumption that early morning and night hours will be less congested, so the driver may be accepting a gate queue delay but achieving a quicker overall turn time. By wait- ing in the queue at 6 P.M., he may be getting his work done earlier than if he waited until 7 P.M. or 8 P.M. when the queue had lessened. Reduced business volumes during the current recession have created problems for the Pier- PASS/OffPeak system. Fees paid for daytime entry are used to offset the cost of keeping gates open for extended hours. At present (2010), however, off-peak fee collection has reportedly declined and cost-conscious terminal operators would like to avoid the added cost of extended gates. At the same time, problems with daytime congestion have abated, reducing the need for nighttime capacity. Terminal operators have reduced staffing for both day and night operations, and truckers are reporting longer turn times even in the era of reduced trade. The longer turn times are particularly troublesome for truckers who have invested in new or retrofitted clean trucks, and who need enough daily turns to cover the truck payments. Most firms have structured their operations to take advantage of the nighttime hours, and now find those hours less productive. The PierPASS/OffPeak system was designed to mitigate the effects of growing daytime conges- tion at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Despite imperfections and teething problems it was largely successful and both truckers and customers adapted operations to suit. Under chang- ing circumstances, the PierPASS/OffPeak Program will probably require more flexibility but the precise nature of that flexibility is not yet apparent. Advanced Terminal Gate Designs The most technically advanced gate observed by the NCFRP Project 14 study team was at APM Portsmouth, Virginia (Figure 63). The goal of the gate operation is to identify motor carriers with "clean" transactions early and process them quickly. There is an appointment system with a 4-hour window. Truckers tell the terminal when they are coming--mostly the day before. The trucks that have appointments equal 70%. Only 3% get trouble tickets. The average turn time is less than an hour. Each truck coming to the terminal must be equipped with an RFID tag or it is not permitted to enter. The RFID readers are located on the Western Freeway interchange. As the trucks pass the reader, a computer is activated and the terminal prepares for the truck's arrival. The first step in the process is a seal check, which is done for all trucks entering. This task is done by a clerk in a pickup before arriving at the first building. The data are entered into a handheld
OCR for page 52
52 Truck Drayage Productivity Guide Administrative and Inspection Staff TWIC Check and Gate Pass Out Gate Facilities Variable Message Sign Problem Resolution Building Seal Check and Equipment Inspection Cameras Western Freeway RFID Readers on ramp and under bridge Figure 63. APM Portsmouth gate. device, if necessary. The truck then proceeds to the first small building where a physical inspection is done by camera while the truck moves through. During the trucker's transition to the next sta- tion, an inspector located in the headquarters building reads the inspection photos. About a third of the way to the next building there is an overhead message sign that tells the trucker which of three sets of lanes he should use. (One set of lanes is for trucks with no problems, another set is for trucks without appointments and those with trouble tickets, and another returns rejected trucks to the beginning.) At the second building, the driver swipes the TWIC. If the driver has an appointment and all is in order, the driver receives an entry permit and instructions. If the driver has an empty, the driver must get out and open the back door for an inspection by camera. This is a 2-minute process, on average. If the driver does not have an appointment, a more conventional process is conducted in the lower part of the second building. It takes 6 minutes, on average, a very typical process time. If there is any kind of trouble, the driver deals with the problem at the trouble building--a small building located between the in/out gates. The parking area is the most visible aspect of Figure 63. At times a queue develops between the first and second inbound buildings. The process is repeated at the out-gate with the radiation monitor being an additional step at the very end.