Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 77
References 1. ICF, Inc. Guidance for Conducting Hazardous Materials Flow Surveys. Report DOT-VNTSC-RSPA-94-2. Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 1995. 2. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101: Developing and Maintaining State, Territorial, Tribal, and Local Government Emergency Plans. Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S. Department of Home- land Security, March 2009. 3. United States: 2007 Commodity Flow Survey. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, and Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Com- merce, December 2009. http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/. Accessed March 2010. 4. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Part 173- Shippers-General Requirements for Shipments and Packagings: Subpart-General: Hazardous materials classes and index to hazard class definitions. 49 CFR, Part 173.2. 5. Cloutier, M., and G. Cushmac. 2008 Emergency Response Guidebook: A Guidebook for First Responders Dur- ing the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident. Office of Hazardous Materials Initiatives and Training, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, 2008. 6. Highway Accident Brief; Tanker truck overturn and fire; Interstate 895 south, near Elkridge, Maryland; Janu- ary 13, 2004. Summary Report NTSB/HAB-09/01. National Transportation Safety Board, July 30, 2009. 7. Railroad Accident Report; Collision of Norfolk Southern Freight Train 192 With Standing Norfolk Southern Local Train P22 With Subsequent Hazardous Materials Release at Graniteville, South Carolina; January 6, 2005. Report RAR-05/04. National Transportation Safety Board, November 29, 2005. 8. Branscomb, L.M., Fagan, M., Auerswald, P., Ellis, R.N., and R. Barcham. Rail Transportation of Toxic Inhala- tion Hazards: Policy Responses to the Safety and Security Externality. Report RPP-2010-01. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2010. 9. Pipeline Accident Report; Rupture of Hazardous Liquid Pipeline With Release and Ignition of Propane; Carmichael, Mississippi; November 1, 2007. Accident Report NTSB/PAR-09/01. National Transportation Safety Board, October 14, 2009. 10. Statement of Rear Admiral James Watson, Directory of Prevention Policy, on the New Orleans Oil Spill and Safety on the Inland River System Before The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcom- mittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives, September 16, 2008. U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security. http://transportation.house.gov/Media/File/ Coast%20Guard/20080916/CG%20testimony.pdf. Accessed April 2010. 11. Nossiter, A. Mississippi River Reopened After Oil Spill. New York Times, July 25, 2008. 12. McConnell, M.P. I-75 bridge work under way. Macomb Daily, October 22, 2009. 13. Highway Routing of Hazardous Materials: Guidelines for Applying Criteria. Publication No. FHWA-HI-97-003. National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. 1996. 14. Traffic Monitoring Guide. Office of Highway Policy Information, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Report FHWA-PL-01-021. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tmguide, 2001. 15. The Delaney Clause, Food Additives Amendment of 1938 to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1954, Section 409 (21 U.S.C. 348 (c)(3)(A)). 16. Department of Defense Authorization Act of 1986, P.L. 99-145, Section 1412 (Nov. 8, 1985), 50 U.S.C. § 1521. 17. NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1/Rev. 1/Supp.3, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Federal Emergency Management Agency, July 1996. 77
OCR for page 78
78 Guidebook for Conducting Local Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Studies 18. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments (OMB Circular A-87). 2 CFR, Part 225, 2005. 19. National Institute for Chemical Studies. Local Emergency Planning Committees and Risk Management Plans: Encouraging Hazard Reduction. Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office, U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency, June 2001. 20. Transportation Statistics Annual Report 2007. Table B-5. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, June 2008. 21. Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2007. Analysis Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 2009. 22. Craft, R. Crashes Involving Trucks Carrying Hazardous Materials. Analysis Brief. Publication Number FMCSA-RI-04-024. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2004. 23. Traffic Safety Facts 2007. Report Number DOT HS 811 002. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008. 24. Battelle. Comparative Risks of Hazardous Materials and Non-Hazardous Materials Truck Shipment Accidents/ Incidents: Final Report. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, March 2001. 25. United States Code Title 49, Subtitle III, Chapter 51, § 5116. 26. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Guidelines for Chemical Transportation Risk Analysis. New York, 1995. 27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and U.S. Department of Transportation. Technical Guidance for Hazards Analysis: Emergency Planning for Extremely Hazardous Substances. December 1987. 28. San Diego: Hazardous Material Commodity Flow Study. US/Mexico Border Program, Chemical Emergency Prevention and Preparedness Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX. San Francisco. June 2001. 29. Battelle Memorial Institute. HMCRP Report 1: Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident Data for Root Cause Analysis. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 2009.