National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Synthesis 415: Design Fires in Road Tunnels (2011)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Program (NCHRPSYN)

Citation Manager

Maevski, Igor Y, Transportation Research Board. "Temperature of Fire Gases and Tunnel Walls." NCHRP Synthesis 415: Design Fires in Road Tunnels. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
68
bottomleft bottomright
Page
68
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-5)
Project Overview (6-6)
Description of the Survey Process (7-8)
Prevention of Tunnel Highway Fires (9-9)
Making Transportation Tunnels Safe and Secure (10-10)
UPTUN - Summary (11-11)
SafeT (12-12)
Safe Tunnel (13-13)
EGSISTES (14-14)
Summary (15-15)
Heat Effects (16-16)
Air Carbon Monoxide Content (17-17)
Air Velocities (18-18)
Summary (19-19)
Cause of Vehicular Fires in Road Tunnels (20-22)
Consequences of Tunnel Fires (23-23)
Summary (24-25)
Combined Use for Road and Railway Vehicles (26-27)
Full Scale Tests (28-34)
Small-Scale Testing (Physical Modeling) (35-35)
Large-Scale Experimental Facilities (36-36)
Gaps in Fire Testing, Modeling Limitations, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Verifications (37-37)
Summary (38-39)
Chapter Seven - Analytical Fire Modeling - Literature Review (40-40)
Analytical (Numerical) Fire Modeling Technique (41-42)
Findings on Numerical Modeling Based on Literature Review (43-43)
Summary (44-44)
Severity of Tunnel Fires (45-45)
Existing Practice of Fire Management in Road Tunnels (46-46)
Best Design Practice (47-47)
Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation of the Fire Management Systems (48-48)
Selected Important Examples (49-49)
Computer-Based Training Tools for Operators to Manage Fire - Virtual Training (50-52)
Background (53-54)
Integrated Approach to Safety in Tunnels (55-56)
Design Fire Size (57-58)
Exploring the Emerging Issues of Alternative Fuel Vehicles on Design Fires (59-63)
Fire Smoke and Smoke Production - Literature Review (64-67)
Temperature of Fire Gases and Tunnel Walls (68-69)
Fire Development Based on Literature Review (70-74)
Summary (75-77)
Chapter Ten - Compilation of Design Guidance, Standards, and Regulations (78-81)
Tunnel Ventilation and International Standards Requirements (82-88)
Tunnel Fire Detection, Notification, and International Standards Requirements (89-91)
Tunnel Egress and International Standards Requirements (92-92)
Tunnel Incident Response and International Standards Requirements (93-94)
Summary (95-95)
TimeTemperature and Time-of-Tenability Curves (96-98)
Emergency Egress Timeline (99-100)
Combined Curve for Evacuation and System Activation (101-101)
Summary (102-103)
Background (104-109)
Summary (110-110)
Influence of Ventilation on Fire Heat Release Rate (111-111)
Influence of Structural and Nonstructural Components on Fire Heat Release Rate (112-112)
Summary (113-113)
Example of Design Fire Size Estimate (114-115)
Chapter Fourteen - Conclusions (116-122)
References (123-125)
Bibliography (126-128)
Glossary (129-129)
Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire (130-135)
Appendix B - List of Responding Agencies (136-136)
Appendix C - Summary of Survey Questionnaire Responses (137-149)
Appendix D - Tunnel Safety Projects Additional Descriptions (150-155)
Appendix E - Fire Tests (156-159)
Appendix F - Comparison of National and International Standards Requirements (160-177)
Appendix G - Past Tunnel Fires Description (178-188)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (189-189)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 68
69 TABLE 19 stream of the fire can be obtained from the following general MASS OPTICAL DENSITY FROM BURNING VEHICLES equation: Average Type of Vehicle Mass Optical Density X i ,avg = Yi × M a Mi × Q ( T ) ma × HT (22) Dmass (m2/kg or ft2/lb) Car (steel) 381 (1,860) Car (plastic) 330 (1,610) Assuming ma mg, where mg is the mass flow rate of combus- Bus 203 (991) tion gases. Here Ma is the molecular weight of air, Mi is the Truck 76­102 (371­498) Source: Fire in Tunnels (9). molecular weight of chemical species i, and Yi is the mass yield of species i for well-ventilated fires. The value of Xi,avg can be converted into a percentage by multiplying it by 100. The yields of YCO2, YCO, and YHCN for well-ventilated conditions downstream of the fire with a ventilation air velocity of u can be obtained for different fuels. (m/s) is: Table 20 presents some values for different fuels for well- uAH ventilated conditions. A lack of sufficient experimental data V = 0.87 (21) and test results requires designers to use values from this table. QDmass By using this table, the designer is making an assumption by replacing an actual vehicle fire with pseudo-fuel. Different In Table 19 values of Dmass for different types of vehicles designers use different fuels and different values to approxi- are given based on large-scale tests. These values may be used mate the actual fuel, which causes inconsistency in modeling as an engineering tool for determining the visibility in fires and design results. depending on the fuel load. The yield values are the mean values for different material For CFD modeling, engineers use equations and tables of types (polyurethane foam, polystyrene, mineral oil). However, yields of CO, CO2, HCN, heat of combustion, production of there is a need to replace the simulated materials with design soot, and mass OD for different types of materials, such as values for fires involving HGVs, buses, cars, and tankers. wood, polyurethane foam, polystyrene, and mineral oil. Such Additional testing results are needed. tables can be found in the SFPE Handbook for Fire Protection Engineering (51) and other literature. Surprisingly, the vehicles TEMPERATURE OF FIRE GASES are assumed to be one material, which leads to inconsistency AND TUNNEL WALLS in the results, as there is no uniform agreement on the numbers to use and to the inaccuracy of the CFD results. Tunnel fires significantly increase the air temperature in the tunnel roadway and in the exhaust air duct. Therefore, The average mole fraction Xi,avg of CO2, CO, or HCN over both the tunnel structure and ventilation equipment are exposed the cross section of the tunnel and at a certain position down- to high smoke and gas temperature. The air temperatures, TABLE 20 YIELDS OF CO2, CO, HCN, AND SMOKE AND EFFECTIVE HEAT OF COMBUSTION, FOR WELL-VENTILATED FIRES Dmass Hec YC02 YCO YHCN Ys m2/kg MJ/kg Type of Material kg/kg kg/kg kg/kg kg/kg (ft2/lb) (Btu/lb) Wood 1.27 0.004 0.015 37 12.4 (181) (5,331) Rigid Polyurethane Foam 1.50 0.027 0.01 0.131 304 16.4 (1,480) (7,050) Polystyrene 2.33 0.06 0.164 335 27 (1,640) (11,610) Mineral Oil 2.37 0.041 0.097 31.7 (13,630) Swiss Fire Modeling Assumption on 2.07 0.043 0.01 0.13 Average of Three Materials Above Source: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (51). Ys = yield of smoke. Dmass = mass optical density and is proportional to yield of smoke. Hec = XHT ­ effective heat of combustion. Mass loss rate of the fuel, kg/s: mf = Q(T)/ Hec. Q(T) = fire heat release rate, HRR (kW).

OCR for page 69
70 TABLE 21 MAXIMUM AIR TEMPERATURES EXPERIENCED AT VENTILATION FANS DURING MEMORIAL TUNNEL FIRE VENTILATION TEST PROGRAM Nominal FHRR, Temperature at Central Fans, Temperature at Jet Fans, a b MW (MBtu/h ) °C (°F) °C (°F) 20 (68) 107 (225) 232 (450 ) 50 (170) 124 (255) 371 (700) 100 (340) 163 (325) 677 (1250) Source: ASHRAE Handbook (22). FHRR = Fire heat release rate. a Central fans located 700 ft (213 m) from fire site. b Jet fans located 170 ft (52 m) downstream of fire site. shown in Table 21, provide guidance in selecting design expo- in Table 23. This also refers to the need to ensure that equip- sure temperatures for ventilation equipment. ment does not fall when exposed to a temperature of 450°C (842°F) for at least 120 min. British standards provided data on distances over which jet fans were assumed to be destroyed by the fire; this is Different fire characteristics are needed depending on reproduced in Table 22. BD 78/99 also specifies that heavy whether the purpose is to design the tunnel structure or the items, such as fans, subjected to temperatures of 450°C ventilation facilities. (842°F), are to be designed to not fall down during the fire- fighting phase (52). · The design of structures for fire resistance is based on the temperature of the hot air (degrees centigrade or The French Inter-Ministry Circular (2000) specifies that jet degrees Fahrenheit) and radiation heat versus time. fans must be capable of operating continuously in smoke- · The design of a ventilation system is based on the HRR laden air at a temperature of 200°C (392°F) for at least 2 h. (thermal power in megawatts or million British thermal For transverse ventilation systems, a distinction must be units per hour) or the smoke release rate (flow at the made on the basis of whether the fans are or are not likely to temperature of the hot smoke in cubic meters per second) be subjected to very high temperatures. In the general case, versus time. extraction fans, located at the end of a duct, must be capable of operating at a temperature of 200°C (392°F) for at least The dependence on time is important for evaluating the 120 min. However, under certain circumstances, it may be conditions at the beginning of the fire, taking into account the necessary for the fans to be capable of withstanding 400°C self-rescue phase (time for the fire department to arrive and (752°F) for at least 120 min. Rather than providing informa- get organized). tion on the distances over which jet fans may be considered as destroyed, the French guidance provides smoke tempera- PIARC recommends the following maximum temper- tures at various distances (CETU 2003). This is reproduced atures at the tunnel wall or ceiling to be considered for TABLE 22 DISTANCES OVER WHICH JET FANS ARE ASSUMED TO BE DESTROYED BY FIRE (BD 78/99) Fire Size, Distance Upstream Distance Downstream MW (MBtu/h) of Fire, m (ft) of Fire, m (ft) 5 (1 7 ) -- -- 20 (68) 10 (32.8) 40 (131.2) 50 (171) 20 (65.6) 80 (262.5) 100 (341) 30 (98.4) 120 (393.7) Source: Hall (52). TABLE 23 SMOKE TEMPERATURES NEAR THE CEILING, WITH AIRFLOW CLOSE TO CRITICAL VELOCITY Downstream Distance 10 m 100 m 200 m 400 m Light Vehicle 250°C 80°C 40°C 30°C Heavy Vehicle 700°C 250°C 120°C 60°C Tanker >1000°C 400°C 200°C 100°C Source: Hall (52).