National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 90: Video Surveillance Uses by Rail Transit Agencies (2011)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Schulz, Dorothy Moses, Gilbert, Susan, Transportation Research Board. "Patron and Employee Awareness and Perceptions of Video Surveillance." TCRP Synthesis 90: Video Surveillance Uses by Rail Transit Agencies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
43
bottomleft bottomright
Page
43
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
CHAPTER ONE - Introduction (5-6)
Project Background and Objectives (7-7)
Report Organization (8-9)
History of Electronic Video Surveillance in Transit (10-10)
Video Surveillance and Risk Management (11-12)
Expanding the Definition of Risk (13-14)
The London Underground's Influence on Transit Surveillance Systems (15-15)
Use of Surveillance by Transit Systems Worldwide (16-18)
Use of Video Surveillance by Canadian Transit Systems (19-20)
Video Surveillance and Public Perceptions of Safety and Security (21-23)
Introduction (24-24)
Stations, Station Platforms, and Shelters (25-26)
Onboard Railcars (27-27)
Parking Facilities (28-29)
Storage Yards, Other Yards, and Administrative Areas (30-30)
Right-of-Way Surveillance (31-33)
Deciding Where to Install Video Surveillance (34-35)
Funding Video Surveillance Systems (36-37)
Monitoring Video Cameras - When and by Whom (38-38)
Video Analytics (39-40)
Video Surveillance as a Forensic Tool (41-41)
Patron and Employee Awareness and Perceptions of Video Surveillance (42-43)
Case Study 1: Altamont Commuter Express, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission, California (44-45)
Case Study 2: Metro Transit, Minneapolis, Minnesota (46-48)
Case Study 3: Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Houston, Texas (49-50)
Case Study 4: Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (51-53)
Case Study 5: Valley Metro Rail, Phoenix, Arizona (54-56)
CHAPTER SIX - Conclusions (57-60)
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (61-61)
GLOSSARY (62-63)
REFERENCES (64-67)
LITERATURE REVIEW [ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY] (68-73)
APPENDIX A - Synthesis Questionnaire (74-78)
APPENDIX B - Questionnaire Respondents (79-81)