Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles NCHRP Report 519: Connection of Simple-Span Precast Concrete Girders for Continuity NCHRP Report 527: Integral Steel Box-Beam Pier Caps Other Related Titles NCHRP Report 698: Application of Accelerated Bridge Construction Connections in Moderate-to-High Seismic Regions (2011) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager Marsh, M Lee, Stanton, John F, Wernli, Markus, Eberhard, Marc O, Garrett, Brian E, Weinert, Michael D, Transportation Research Board. "Bibliography." NCHRP Report 698: Application of Accelerated Bridge Construction Connections in Moderate-to-High Seismic Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011. Please select a format: Page 50   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore Page 50 Front Matter (R1-R10) Summary (1-1) Objectives of the Study (2-2) Organization of the Research Report (3-3) Definition of Seismic Connections and Performance Strategies (4-6) Classification of Connection Types (7-8) Evaluation Methodology (9-13) Bridge Systems (14-14) Evaluation of Connection Types (15-29) Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (30-30) Time Savings (31-31) Evaluation of ABC Bent and Bridge Systems (32-34) Identification of Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities for Connections for Seismic Performance (35-42) Conclusions (43-45) Suggested Research (46-47) Acronyms (48-49) Bibliography (50-53) Appendices A through J (54-54) Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (55-55)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 50
50 Bibliography ACI Innovation Task Group 1. (2003). ACI T1.2-03: Special Hybrid Christopoulos, C., and Folz, B. (2002). Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Moment Frames Composed of Discretely Jointed Precast and Post- Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames. Journal of Struc- Tensioned Concrete Members. tural Engineering, 128(9), pp. 1111­1120. Alderson, J. (2005). Report on Precast Beam Cap Pilot Project. Missouri Chung, P., Wolfe, R., Ostrom, T., and Hida, S. (2008). Accelerated Department of Transportation. Jefferson City. Bridge Construction Applications in California--A Lessons Learned American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Report. Caltrans. Sacramento, CA. (AASHTO). (2009). AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Cohagen, L., Pang, J., Eberhard, M., and Stanton, J. (2008). A Precast Bridge Design. AASHTO. Washington, DC. Concrete Bridge Bent Designed to Re-Center After an Earthquake. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Report No. WA-RD 684.3. Washington State Transportation Cen- (AASHTO). (2010). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, ter (TRAC). 5th ed. AASHTO. Washington, DC. Concrete Technology Associates. (1974). Ductile Pullout Connections. Aref, A. (2009). Technical Monograph Development on Seismic Accelerated Report No. 74-B11. Tacoma, WA. Bridge Construction--FHWA Research Project Briefing. MCEER. Culmo, M. (2009). Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements State University of New York at Buffalo. and Systems. Report No. FHWA-IF-09-010. Federal Highway Admin- Asnaashari, A., Grafton, R. J., and Johnnie, M. (2005). Precast Concrete istration, Office of Bridge Technology. Washington, DC. Design-Construction of San Mateo-Hayward Bridge Widening Eligehausen, R., Cook, R., and Appl, J. (2006a). Behavior and Design Project. PCI Journal, 50(1), pp. 26­43. of Adhesive Bonded Anchors. ACI Structural Journal, 103(6), Billington, S. L., Barnes, R. W., and Breen, J. E. (1999). A Precast Seg- pp. 822­832. mental Substructure System for Standard Bridges. PCI Journal, Eligehausen, R., Mallée, R., and Silva, J. F. (2006b). Anchorage in Concrete 44(4), pp. 56­73. Construction. Wiley-VCH. Hoboken, NJ. Billington, S. L., Barnes, R. W., and Breen, J. E. (2001). Alternate Sub- Englekirk, R. E. (2002). Design-Construction of the Paramount: A 39- structure Systems for Standard Highway Bridges. Journal of Bridge Story Precast Prestressed Concrete Apartment Building. PCI Journal, Engineering, 6(2), pp. 87­94. 47(4), pp. 56­71. Billington, S. L., and Yoon, J. K. (2004). Cyclic Response of Unbonded Fam, A., Pando, M., Filz, G., and Rizkalla, S. (2003). Precast Piles for Posttensioned Precast Columns with Ductile Fiber-Reinforced Route 40 Bridge in Virginia using Concrete Filled FRP Tubes. PCI Concrete. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9(4), pp. 353­363. Journal, 48(3), pp. 32­45. Bozorgzadeh, A., Megally, S. H., Ashford, S., and Restrepo, J. (2007). Federal Highway Administration. (2007). 2007 FHWA Seismic Accelerated Seismic Response of Sacrificial Exterior Shear Keys in Bridge Abutments. Bridge Construction Workshop--Final Report. Washington, DC. Structural Systems Research Project. Report No. SSRP-04/14. Univer- Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2007). Manual on Use of sity of California, San Diego. Self-Propelled Modular Transporters to Remove and Replace Bridges. Brenes, F., Wood, S., and Kreger, M. (2006). Anchorage Requirements FHWA, U.S. DOT. Washington, DC. for Grouted Vertical-Duct Connectors in Precast Bent Cap Systems. fib Bulletin 27: Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures. Report No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4176-1. Center for Transportation (2003). Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Struc- Research, The University of Texas at Austin. tural Concrete (fib). Bromenschenkel, R. (2010). Caltrans Next Generation Bridge. 26th US- Fouad, F. H., Hamby, D., Rizk, T., and Stafford, E. L. (2006). Prefabricated Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop. New Orleans, LA, Sept. 20­22, Precast Concrete Bridge System for the State of Alabama. University 2010. Transportation Center for Alabama. Tuscaloosa. Buchanan, A., Deam, B., Fragiacomo, M., Pampanin, S., and Palermo, A. Guarre, J. S., and Hjorteset, K. (1999). Seismic Design of the Getty Center (2008). Multi-Storey Prestressed Timber Buildings in New Zealand. Tram Guideway. Concrete International, 21, pp. 37­42. Structural Engineering International, 18(2), pp. 166­173. Gurbuz, T., and Ilki, A. (2011). Pullout Performance of Fully and Partially Buckle, I., Friedland, I., Mander, J., Martin, G., Nutt, R., and Power, M. Bonded Retrofit Anchors in Low-Strength Concrete. ACI Structural (2006). Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1-- Journal, 108(1), pp. 61­70. Bridges. Report No. FHWA-HRT-06-032. Federal Highway Admin- Haraldsson, O., Pang, J., Stanton, J., and Eberhard, M. (2009). A Precast istration, McLean, VA. Concrete Bridge Bent for Seismic Regions. Proc., Special International

OCR for page 51
51 Workshop on Seismic Connection Details for Segmental Bridge Con- Mahin, S. (2008). Sustainable Design Considerations in Earthquake struction, Seattle, WA, pp. 55­65. Engineering. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineer- Haraldsson, O., Stanton, J., and Eberhard, M. (2010 Draft). Laboratory ing, Beijing, China. Tests of Column-to-Footing Socket Connection (Draft Report). Mahin, S., Sakai, J., and Jeong, H. (2006). Use of Partially Prestressed Washington State DOT. Olympia. Reinforced Concrete Columns to Reduce Post-Earthquake Resid- Hieber, D. G., Wacker, J. M., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. ual Displacements of Bridges. Fifth National Seismic Conference on (2005a). Precast Concrete Pier Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges & Highways, San Francisco, CA. Bridges in Seismic Regions. Report No. WA-RD 611.1. Washington Marson, J., and Bruneau, M. (2004). Cyclic Testing of Concrete-Filled State Transportation Center (TRAC). Circular Steel Bridge Piers Having Encased Fixed-Based Detail. Hieber, D. G., Wacker, J. M., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2005b). Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9(1), pp. 14­23. State-of-the-Art Report on Precast Concrete Systems for Rapid Con- Matsumoto, E. (2000). Development of a Precast Bent Cap System. struction of Bridges. Report No. WA-RD 594.1. Washington State (Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation). Center for Transportation Transportation Center (TRAC). Research, The University of Texas at Austin. Holombo, J., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (1998). Longitudinal Seismic Matsumoto, E. (2009a). Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seis- Response of Precast Spliced-Girder Bridges. Report No. SSRP-98/05. mic Regions: Component Tests--Cast-in-Place Specimen (Unit 1). University of California, San Diego. Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-01. California State University, Holombo, J., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (2000). Continuity of Sacramento. Precast Prestressed Spliced-Girder Bridges Under Seismic Loads. Matsumoto, E. (2009b). Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for PCI Journal, 45(2), pp. 40­63. Seismic Regions: Component Test Report--Grouted Duct Specimen Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 550. (2009). ACI 550.1R-09: Guide to Emu- (Unit 2). Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-02. California State Univer- lating Cast-in-Place Detailing for Seismic Design of Precast Concrete sity, Sacramento. Structures. Matsumoto, E. (2009c). Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Josten, M. G., Painter Jr., W. L., and Guarre, J. S. (1995). Precast Pre- Seismic Regions: Component Test Report--Cap Pocket Full Ductility stressed Concrete Structure Provides Solution for Getty Center Tram Specimen (Unit 3). Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-03. California Guideway. PCI Journal, 40(3), pp. 24­39. State University, Sacramento. Karapiperis, D., Lykidis, G., Savvopoulos, G. C., Khaled, E. S., and Matsumoto, E. (2009d). Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for Seis- Loukakis, K. (2010). Combined Effort. Civil Engineering, 80(7), mic Regions: Component Test Report--Cap Pocket Limited Ductility pp. 74­85. Specimen (Unit 4). Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-04. California State Kesner, K. E., Billington, S. L., and Douglas, K. S. (2003). Cyclic Response University, Sacramento. of Highly Ductile Cement-Based Composites. ACI Materials Journal, Matsumoto, E. (2009e). Emulative Precast Bent Cap Connections for 100(5), pp. 381­390. Seismic Regions: Grouted Duct and Cap Pocket Test Results, Design Khaleghi, B. (2011). ABC in Washington State, Accelerated Bridge Con- and Construction Specifications, Design Examples, and Connection struction: Research, Design, and Practice Workshop. Presented at Details. Report No. ECS-CSUS-2009-05. California State Univer- the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, sity, Sacramento. Washington, DC. Khaleghi, B. (2005). Use of Precast Concrete Members for Accelerated Matsumoto, E., Waggoner, M., Kreger, M., Vogel, J., and Wolf, L. Bridge Construction in Washington State. Transportation Research (2008). Development of a Precast Concrete Bent-Cap System. PCI Board--6th International Bridge Engineering Conference: Reliability, Journal, 53(3), pp. 74­99. Security, and Sustainability in Bridge Engineering, Boston, MA, Matsumoto, E., Waggoner, M., Sumen, G., Kreger, M., Wood, S., and July 17­20, 2005, pp. 187­196. Breen, J. (2001). Development of a Precast Bent Cap System. Report Kingsley, A. M. (2005). Experimental and Analytical Investigation of No. 1748-02. Center for Transportation Research, The University Embedded Column Base Connections for Concrete Filled High of Texas at Austin. Strength Steel Tubes. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). University Megally, S. H., Silva, P. F., and Seible, F. (2002). Seismic Response of Washington, Seattle, WA. of Sacrificial Shear Keys in Bridge Abutments. Structural Systems Kwan, W. P., and Billington, S. L. (2003a). Unbonded Posttensioned Research Project. Report No. SSRP-2001/23. University of California, Concrete Bridge Piers. I: Monotonic and Cyclic Analyses. Journal San Diego. of Bridge Engineering, 8(2), pp. 92­101. Mistry, V., and Mangus, A. (2006). Get In, Stay In, Get Out, Stay Out. Kwan, W. P., and Billington, S. L. (2003b). Unbonded Posttensioned Public Roads, 70(3). Concrete Bridge Piers. II: Seismic Analyses. Journal of Bridge Engi- Moreell, B. (1935). Articulations for Concrete Structures--the Mes- neering, 8(2), pp. 102­111. nager Hinge. ACI Journal Proceedings, 31(3), pp. 368­381. Lai, Y. C. (2010). Moment Connections of Concrete-Filled Fibre Rein- Motaref, S., Saiidi, M. S., and Sanders, D. (2010). Experimental Study forced Polymer Tubes to Reinforced Concrete Footings. (Unpub- of Precast Bridge Columns with Built-in Elastomer. In Transporta- lished Master's Thesis). Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Canada. No. 2202, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- Lee, W., Jeong, H., Billington, S., Mahin, S. A., and Sakai, J. (2007). Post- mies, Washington, DC, pp. 109­116. Tensioned Structural Concrete Bridge Piers with Self-Centering Moustafa, S. (1974). Ductile Pullout Connections. Report No. 74-B11. Characteristics. 2007 ASCE Structures Congress, Long Beach, CA. Concrete Technology Associates (Now available from Precast Pre- Lee, W. K., and Billington, S. L. (2009). Simulation and Performance-Based stressed Concrete Institute). Earthquake Engineering Assessment of Self-Centering Post-Tensioned Nakaki, S., Stanton, J., and Sritharan, S. (1999). An Overview of Concrete Bridge Systems. Report No. 2009/109. Pacific Earthquake the PRESSS Five-Story Precast Test Building. PCI Journal, 44(2), Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley. pp. 26­39.

OCR for page 52
52 Nelson, M., Lai, Y. C., and Fam, A. (2008). Moment Connection of Con- (2005). Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems in Japan and crete-Filled Fiber Reinforced Polymer Tubes by Direct Embedment Europe. Report No. FHWA-PL-05-003. Federal Highway Admin- into Footings. Advances in Structural Engineering, 11(5), pp. 537­547. istration. Washington, DC. Osanai, Y., Watanabe, F., and Okamoto, S. (1996). Stress Transfer Mech- Raynor, D. J., Lehman, D. E., and Stanton, J. F. (2002). Bond-Slip anism of Socket Base Connections with Precast Concrete Columns. Response of Reinforcing Bars Grouted in Ducts. ACI Structural ACI Structural Journal, 93(3), pp. 266­276. Journal, 99(5), pp. 568­576. Ou, Y. C., Chiewanichakorn, M., Ahn, I. S., Aref, A. J., Chen, S. S., Restrepo, J., Matsumoto, E., and Tobolski, M. (2011). NCHRP Report Filiatrault, A., and Lee, G. C. (2006). Cyclic Performance of Precast 681: Development of Precast Bent Cap Systems for Seismic Regions. Concrete Segmental Bridge Columns: Simplified Analytical and Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Finite Element Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal Washington, DC. of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1976(1), Transportation Riva, P. (2006). Seismic Behaviour of Precast Column-to-Foundation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Washington, Grouted Sleeve Connections. Proc., International Conference on DC, pp. 66­74. Advances in Engineering Structures, Mechanics & Construction, Ou, Y. C., Tsai, M. S., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2010a). Cyclic Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 121­128. Behavior of Precast Segmental Concrete Bridge Columns with High Roeder, C. W. (2010). Personal Communication with John Stanton. Performance or Conventional Steel Reinforcing Bars as Energy Dis- University of Washington. Seattle. sipation Bars. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39, Roeder, C. W., and Lehman, D. E. (2008). An Economical and Efficient pp. 1181­1198. Foundation Connection for Concrete Filled Steel Tube Piers and Ou, Y. C., Wang, P. H., Tsai, M. S., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2010b). Columns. Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete VI, Granby, Large-Scale Experimental Study of Precast Segmental Unbonded CO. Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Columns for Seismic Regions. Jour- Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., and Bishop, E. (2010). Strength and nal of Structural Engineering, 136(3), pp. 255­264. Stiffness of Circular Concrete-Filled Tubes. Journal of Structural Pang, J., Steuck, K., Cohagen, L., Eberhard, M., and Stanton, J. (2008). Engineering, 136(12), pp. 1545­1553. Rapidly Constructible Large-Bar Precast Bridge-Bent Seismic Con- Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., and Thody, R. (2009). Composite Action nection. Report No. WA-RD 684.2. Washington State Transporta- in CFT Components and Connections. AISC Engineering Journal, tion Center (TRAC). 47(4), pp. 229­242. Pang, J. B. K., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2010). Large-Bar Roh, H., and Reinhorn, A. M. (2010). Hysteretic Behavior of Precast Connection for Precast Bridge Bents in Seismic Regions. Journal of Segmental Bridge Piers with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy Bridge Engineering, 15(3), pp. 231­239. Bars. Engineering Structures, 32(10), pp. 3394­3403. Park, R. (2011). ABC in Utah, Accelerated Bridge Construction: Research, Rowell, S. P., Grey, C. E., Woodson, S. C., and Hager, K. P. (2009). High Design, and Practice Workshop. Presented at the 90th Annual Meet- Strain-Rate Testing of Mechanical Couplers. Report No. ERDC TR- ing of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. 09-8. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Port Hueneme, CA. Patty, J, Seible, F. and Uang, C. (2001). Seismic Response of Integral Sadeghian, P., and Fam, A. (2010). Bond-Slip Analytical Formulation Bridge Connections. Report No. SSRP 2000/16. Structural Systems toward Optimal Embedment of Concrete-Filled Circular FRP Tubes Research Project, University of California, San Diego, June. into Concrete Footings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136(4), Paulson, C., and Hanson, J. M. (1991). Fatigue Behavior of Welded pp. 524­533. and Mechanical Splices in Reinforcing Steel. NCHRP Project Saiidi, M. S., O'Brien, M., and Mahmoud, S. (2009). Cyclic Response of 10-35 Final Report. National Cooperative Highway Research Pro- Concrete Bridge Columns using Superelastic Nitinol and Bendable gram. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 106(1), pp. 69­77. Washington, DC. Saiidi, M. S., and Wang, H. (2006). Exploratory Study of Seismic PCI Bridge Design Manual. (2004). Precast/Prestressed Concrete Insti- Response of Concrete Columns with Shape Memory Alloys Rein- tute. Chicago, IL. forcement. ACI Structural Journal, 103(3), pp. 435­442. PCI Design Handbook--Precast and Prestressed Concrete. (2004). (6th ed.) Salsa, D. E., and Salvadori, J. E. (2010). Route 36 Highlands Bridge Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL. Replacement. Aspire, Summer, pp. 26­28. PCI Northeast. (2006). Guidelines for Accelerated Bridge Construction Snyder, R., and Sritharan, S. (2010a). Caltrans Project 05-0160--Seismic using Precast/Prestressed Concrete Components. Report No. PCINER- Performance of an I-Girder to Inverted-T Bent Cap Connection: A 06-ABC. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL. Summary of the Horizontal Load Test of the Inverted-T Test Unit. PCI Seismic Design Subcommittee. (2010). The State of the Practice Iowa State University, Ames. Report of Seismic Bridge Design with Precast Members (Final Draft Snyder, R., and Sritharan, S. (2010b). Caltrans Project 05-0160--Seismic Report). Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL. Performance of an I-Girder to Inverted-T Bent Cap Connection: A Priestley, M. J. N., Sritharan, S., Conley, J. R., and Pampanin, S. (1999). Summary of the Vertical Load Test of the Inverted-T Test Unit. Iowa Preliminary Results and Conclusions from the PRESSS Five-Story State University, Ames. Precast Concrete Test Building. PCI Journal, 44(6), pp. 42­67. Splice Sleeve Japan Ltd. (Undated). Tests on Re-Bar Splices in Reinforced Proc., Special International Workshop on Seismic Connection Details for Concrete Columns using NMB Splice Sleeves. Report No. NPD-024 Segmental Bridge Construction. (2009). MCEER. University of Buf- (Unpublished). falo, State University of New York. Sritharan, S. (2005a). Improved Seismic Design Procedure for Con- Ralls, M. L. (2006). Framework for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Sys- crete Bridge Joints. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(9), tems (PBES) Decision-Making. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/ pp. 1334­1344. prefab/framework.cfm. Accessed Dec. 2, 2010. Sritharan, S. (2005b). Strut-and-Tie Analysis of Bridge Tee Joints Sub- Ralls, M. L., Tang, B. M., Bhide, S., Brecto, B., Calvert, E., Capers, H., jected to Seismic Actions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(9), Dorgan, D., Matsumoto, E., Napier, C., Nickas, W., and Russell, H. 1321­1333.

OCR for page 53
53 Sritharan, S., and Ingham, J. (2003). Application of Strut-and-Tie Con- Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). (2009a). ABC SPMT cepts to Concrete Bridge Joints in Seismic Regions. PCI Journal, Process Manual and Design Guide. UDOT. Salt Lake City, UT. 48(4), pp. 66­80. Utah Department of Transportation. (2009b). Precast Piers and Foot- Sritharan, S., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (1999). Enhancing Seis- ings. http://dot.utah.gov. Accessed Sept. 24, 2010. mic Performance of Bridge Cap Beam-to-Column Joints using Pre- Utah Department of Transportation. (2009c). SPMT Typical Details. stressing. PCI Journal, 44(4), pp. 74­91. http://dot.utah.gov. Accessed Sept. 24, 2010. Sritharan, S., Priestley, M. J. N., and Seible, F. (2001). Seismic Design Utah Department of Transportation. (2010). Precast Substructure Ele- and Experimental Verification of Concrete Multiple Column Bridge ments Manual. http://dot.utah.gov. Accessed Sept. 24, 2010. Bents. ACI Structural Journal, 98(3), pp. 335­346. Wacker, J. M., Hieber, D. G., Stanton, J. F., and Eberhard, M. O. Sritharan, S., Vander Werff, J., Abendroth, R. E., Wassef, W. G., and (2005). Design of Precast Concrete Piers for Rapid Bridge Construc- Greimann, L. F. (2005). Seismic Behavior of a Concrete/Steel Inte- tion in Seismic Regions. Report No. WA-RD 629.1. Washington gral Bridge Pier System. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(7), State Transportation Center (TRAC). pp. 1083­1094. Walsh, K., and Kurama, Y. (2010). Behavior of Unbonded Post- Stamnas, P. E., and Whittemore, M. D. (2005). All-Precast Substruc- ture Accelerates Construction of Prestressed Concrete Bridge in Tensioning Monostrand Anchorage Systems under Monotonic New Hampshire. PCI Journal, 50(3), pp. 26­39. Tensile Loading. PCI Journal, 55(1), 97­117. Stanton, J. (2010). Unbonded Pretensioned Hybrid Concept. Presented Wang, J. C., Ou, Y. C., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2008). Large-scale at the PEER Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. Seismic Tests of Tall Concrete Bridge Columns with Precast Segmen- Stanton, J., Eberhard, M., and Steuck, K. (2006). Rapid Construction tal Construction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Details for Bridges in Seismic Zones. Proc., 8th US National Con- 37(12), pp. 1449­1465. ference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA. Wassef, W. G., and Davis, D. (2004). NCHRP Report 527: Integral Steel Stanton, J., Stone, W. C., and Cheok, G. S. (1997). Hybrid Reinforced Box-Beam Pier Caps. Transportation Research Board of the National Precast Frame for Seismic Regions. PCI Journal, 42(2), pp. 20­32. Academies, Washington, DC. Steuck, K. P., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2009). Anchorage of Wipf, T., Klaiber, W., and Hockerman, S. (2009). Precast Concrete Ele- Large-Diameter Reinforcing Bars in Ducts. ACI Structural Journal, ments for Accelerated Bridge Construction--Volume 1-1 Laboratory 106(4), pp. 506­513. Testing of Precast Substructure Components: Boone County Bridge. Steuck, K. P., Pang, J., Eberhard, M., and Stanton, J. (2008). Anchorage of Report No. IHRB Project TR-561. Bridge Engineering Center. Iowa Large-Diameter Reinforcing Bars Grouted into Ducts. Report No. WA- State University, Ames. RD 684.1. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC). Youssef, M. A., Alam, M. S., and Nehdi, M. (2008). Experimental Inves- Stone, W. C., Cheok, G. S., and Stanton, J. F. (1995). Performance of tigation on the Seismic Behavior of Beam-Column Joints Reinforced Hybrid Moment-Resisting Precast Beam-Column Concrete Con- with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys. Journal of Earthquake Engi- nections Subjected to Cyclic Loading. ACI Structural Journal, 92(2), neering, 12(7), pp. 1205­1222. pp. 229­249. Zhu, P., and Ma, Z. J. (2010). Selection of Durable Closure Pour Taira, Y., Sakai, J., and Hoshikuma, J. (2009). A Study on Restorable Materials for Accelerated Bridge Construction. Journal of Bridge Precast and Prestressed Hybrid Piers. Proc., Special International Engineering, 15(6), pp. 695­704. Workshop on Seismic Connection Details for Segmental Bridge Con- struction, Seattle, WA, pp. 21­26. Zhu, Z., Ahmad, I., and Mirmiran, A. (2006). Seismic Performance Tang, B. M. (2007). Accelerated Bridge Construction Technology. 23rd of Concrete-Filled FRP Tube Columns for Bridge Substructure. US--Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop, Tsukuba, Japan. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11(3), pp. 359­370. Tobolski, M., Restrepo, J., Matsumoto, E., and Ralls, M. L. (2006). Devel- Zhu, Z., Mirmiran, A., and Saiidi, M. S. (2006). Seismic Performance opment of Precast Bent Cap Concepts. Report No. SSRP-2006/10. of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Substructure Encased in Fiber University of California, San Diego. Composite Tubes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal U.S. Department of Energy Technology Readiness Assessment Guide. of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1976(1), Transporta- (2009). Report No. DOE G 413.3-4. U.S. Department of Energy. tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, Washington DC. pp. 197­206.