Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 72


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 71
71 500 450 400 Lateral Force (kips) 350 300 250 200 Virgin Soil Length = 3 ft 150 Length = 4 ft 100 Length = 5 ft Length = 6 ft 50 Length = 7 ft 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Displacement (in) Figure 6-17. Results of parametric study on the length of the jet grout treatment zone beside the pile cap on the computed load-displacement curve. crete, the increase of the lateral capacity is mainly caused by the on the increase in lateral pile group resistance. For the first of increase of the shear area of the jet grouting soilcrete. There- these studies, the improved soil block is assumed to be at the fore, these results indicate that a lower strength soilcrete, which side of the pile cap and have a length of 4 ft in the direction of could be produced with a lower cost treatment method, could loading, a width of 9 ft perpendicular to the loading direction, produce the same adhesive resistance as that obtained with jet and a depth of 12.5 ft (see Figure 6-19). grouting. This finding increases the potential that soil improve- The compressive strength of the improved soil (f c) is ment methods can be a cost-effective approach for increasing assumed to vary over a wide range between 21 and 7700 psi. lateral pile group resistance. Young's modulus is assumed to abide by the same relation as that of conventional concrete [E = 57000(f 0.5 c) ] and is in the range of 260 to 5000 ksi, which covers the typical strengths of 6.7 Material Strength Effect on mass mixed and jet grouted soil (see Table 6-1). Since the Lateral Pile Group Resistance improved soils with the Young's moduli shown in Table 6-1 Based on the results from the previous parametric studies, are much stiffer than the virgin clay, the improved soils have another set of parametric studies was performed to investi- been modeled as linear elastic materials. gate the effect of the strength of the soil improvement zone The load-displacement curves computed using the FEM model are presented in Figure 6-20 and the improvement ratio is plotted versus compressive strength in Figure 6-21. As shown 2.0 in Figure 6-20, the load-displacement curves all plot on top of each other for the range of compressive strengths investigated. 1.8 As a result, the improvement ratio is essentially constant rela- tive to the compressive strength of the treated zone as shown Improvement Ratio in Figure 6-21. These results show that the lateral capacity of 1.6 the pile group is not sensitive to the compressive strength of the treated zone, which is as expected since all of the improved soils 1.4 are much stiffer than the virgin clay. Therefore, for practical y = 0.0595x + 1.1592 purposes, the improved soils can be considered to act as a rigid 1.2 2 R = 0.9976 block for the range of material properties in Table 6-1. The numerical model suggests that the lateral capacity of the pile 1.0 group is sensitive to the geometry of the improved soil, but not 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 to the material strength (or Young's Modulus), provided the Length (ft) improved soil is much stiffer than the virgin clay. The typical Figure 6-18. Improvement ratio as a function of mass mix and jet grouting soilcrete are much stiffer than the jet grout treatment length adjacent to the cap. soft clay.