Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 24
24 A Handbook for Addressing Water Resource Issues Affecting Airport Development Planning
Summary of Fact Sheet 6:
Coastal Zones and Barriers
The category "coastal zones and barriers" encompasses the impacts of airport development
projects on coastal resources and the associated effects on water quality, biotic habitat, public
safety, and infrastructure.
Regulation of coastal zones and barriers occurs primarily through
· The Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) (regulated under 15 C.F.R. 923 and 930) as
amended by the Coastal Zone Management Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 (23 C.F.R.
650.211) and the Coastal Zone Protection Act of 1996 and
· The Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement
Act of 1990.
The CZMA requires that any development projects with the potential to impact a state's
coastal zone comply with requirements of the federally approved state coastal zone management
program (if the project is being performed or funded by the federal government). The CZMA is
implemented by the states, with federal oversight from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA).
Airports performing development along coastal areas need to consider the potential for
impacts to coastal zones and barriers. Construction of facilities and infrastructure (e.g., sea walls,
jetties, channels, and piers) can have a direct physical impact on coastal resources. Development
along the shoreline can also disrupt natural coastline processes (e.g., barrier island migration).
Airport projects that change airport features such as land use, vegetation, grading, and increased
storm water runoff can result in localized increases in erosion and sedimentation and in the
destabilization of the coastline. New development projects also have the potential to alter water
quality and quantity. Nonpoint source industrial runoff and point source storm water discharges
may contribute to degradation of water quality along the coast.
Project planning and design considerations typically associated with coastal zone and barrier
issues include the following:
· Are there designated coastal zones or barriers within the vicinity of the project?
· What local and state agencies manage compliance with coastal zone and barrier regulations
and what are the requirements?
· What information is required by the agencies to provide approval for the requested activities?
· How long will it take to acquire the required information and what is the expected timeframe
for agency response?
· Can possible mitigation needs and options be assessed in the early planning stages to deter-
mine whether they might impact the site, cost, or schedule?
The process for assessing core regulatory requirements, determining the measures needed for
compliance, and reducing the effects of managing coastal zone and barrier issues on the devel-
opment project are presented in Fact Sheet 6 in Appendix B. A summary of the guidance for
reducing those project impacts follows.
Guidance for Reducing Project Impacts from Managing Issues
Associated with Coastal Zones and Barriers
Data Collection Consult with state agency to confirm coastal zone
boundaries.
OCR for page 25
Handbook Overview 25
Design Development and Consider siting or design alternatives that avoid or
Control Siting minimize impacts to coastal zones or barriers.
Coordinate on the siting and design of controls
and discharges associated with other water
resource issues that are associated with coastal
zone impacts.
Stakeholder Coordination Coordinate with state agency to determine whether
there are controls or design modifications that
may minimize potential coastal impacts. Consult
with state agencies to identify required permits
and approvals and potential timeframes to be
incorporated into project planning.
Documentation Submit complete documentation associated with
consistency evaluation and in accordance with
state-specific requirements.
Construction Ensure agencies fully complete consultation, coor-
dination, and permitting authorizations before
conducting project work.
Mitigation Coordinate with state agency to determine
whether mitigation may be required to address
coastal impacts.