National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Hodge, Daniel, Steele, Christopher W, Transportation Research Board. "Transportation effects." NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
14
bottomleft bottomright
Page
14
Front Matter (R1-R10)
What is the purpose of this guide? (1-2)
Who should use this guide? (3-3)
How to use this guide (4-4)
What do we mean by freight facilities? (5-9)
Keys to freight facility development success (10-10)
Chapter 2: Evaluating Freight Facility Impacts and Benefits (11-12)
Economic effects (13-13)
Transportation effects (14-15)
Other public sector costs (16-16)
Chapter 3: The Critical Roles of Groundwork and Collaboration (17-18)
Laying the groundwork (19-21)
Public sector assistance and incentives (22-24)
Best practices for the public sector (25-28)
Chapter 4: How the Location Selection Process Works (29-29)
Site selection: the big picture (30-30)
Stages of site selection (31-31)
Planning and strategy (32-33)
Network modeling and analysis (34-34)
Location screening (35-35)
Field and site analysis (36-36)
Cost modeling (37-37)
Incentives, negotiations, and final selection (38-38)
Chapter 5: How Candidate Sites Are Evaluated (39-39)
Ability to access key markets or customers (40-42)
Interaction with transportation networks (43-47)
Labor and workforce (48-48)
Total cost environment (49-49)
Availability and cost of suitable facilities (50-51)
Tax environment (52-52)
Weighing site selection factors (53-54)
Changing role of the freight facility (55-55)
Changes in global sourcing (56-57)
Fuel costs and environmental factors (58-59)
Computer model use and sophistication (60-60)
Transportation network congestion (61-61)
Competition with other types of development (62-62)
Appendix A: List of private sector interviewees (63-63)
Appendix B: Glossary of terms (64-69)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (70-70)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 14
is a direct impact. How that employee then spends this salary locally on groceries and housing is a multiplied, indirect impact. The impact of the facility thus expands into the community, state, and country. Economic Development/Business Attraction Freight facilities can be a catalyst for economic development through attracting other suppliers or vendors to form an industry cluster of activity. They may also spur new development or redevelopment of existing properties. The size and timing of economic development/ business attraction effects can vary greatly by facility based on local land use and zoning policies, economic development incentives and marketing, transportation connectivity benefits, and so on. Effects include: · Redevelopment ­ Economic and financial gains from redevelopment of existing underutilized land, including additional job creation and increases in property value. · New Businesses ­ The economic and financial gain of locating new businesses on previously undeveloped land. · Residential Properties ­ Including the addition of new houses and the impacts of increased population. Transportation effects Transportation impacts accrue from changes in the movement of goods and can impact the community and region in a variety of positive and negative ways. These include benefits from modal shifts (and removal of trucks from the roadways), increases or decreases in traffic, and pollution. Mode Choice Mode choice and traffic volume reflect changes in truck, rail, ship, and air volumes due to the selection of transportation mode. The primary impact tends to be to highways as most freight travels by truck for at least a portion of its trip. A facility that allows for lower cost or more efficient mode choice may either reduce truck traffic, or focus truck traffic at the point where modes connect. Traffic The location of the facility will change traffic patterns in the immediate surrounding area. This may result in increased truck traffic to/from the facility depending on highway access, local traffic patterns, and 14 Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials

OCR for page 15
access. Facilities that promote the use of modes other than truck may help keep longer distance trips on more efficient and cost-effective modes, thus reducing overall truck VMT (vehicle miles traveled) on local, regional, and national highways. Congestion Congestion on roads, rails, air and sea can cause community conflict as well as delay in goods reaching their destinations. Congestion can also have direct financial impacts as it increases shipping costs and can lead to investment in infrastructure improvements to alleviate delays. Congestion can also have air quality impacts based on idling. Environment, Emissions, and Energy The pollution and energy usage that accompany freight facilities Impacts changes with the distance traveled and/or the modes used for Transportation transport. Changes in fuel consumption, emissions levels, noise and · Traffic volumes by mode · Direct travel costs vibration are the most common environmental impacts. · Supply chain logistics · Air Quality ­ Fewer pollutants (NO2, CO, CO2, NOX, SO2, · Environment, emissions, and energy particulate matter, volatile organic compounds) are released · Safety and security into the atmosphere with fewer vehicle miles traveled, as Economic emissions are a product primarily of mode and distance · Construction · Direct economic activity at the traveled. Shifts to a more efficient transportation mode (e.g., facility truck to rail via an intermodal terminal, or an increase in the · Multiplier effects distance on rail versus truck) also result in a change in emissions. · Economic development/business attraction In addition, newer intermodal facilities are often equipped with technology improvements to reduce truck idling, leading Costs to further emissions reductions. · Capital · Fuel Consumption (Energy Intensity) ­ While not a direct public · Infrastructure · Operating and Maintenance cost or benefit, shorter trips and less congestion typically result in better fuel efficiency and lower levels of fuel consumption. Energy consumption per ton-mile varies by mode, with air having the highest consumption and maritime the lowest. Better overall fuel efficiency in the network can impact a community's energy profile and have broader, longer term societal benefits. Safety and Security The location and design of freight facilities can also have safety and security effects on the community or region. These include the traffic Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials 15