National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Hodge, Daniel, Steele, Christopher W, Transportation Research Board. "Labor and workforce." NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
48
bottomleft bottomright
Page
48
Front Matter (R1-R10)
What is the purpose of this guide? (1-2)
Who should use this guide? (3-3)
How to use this guide (4-4)
What do we mean by freight facilities? (5-9)
Keys to freight facility development success (10-10)
Chapter 2: Evaluating Freight Facility Impacts and Benefits (11-12)
Economic effects (13-13)
Transportation effects (14-15)
Other public sector costs (16-16)
Chapter 3: The Critical Roles of Groundwork and Collaboration (17-18)
Laying the groundwork (19-21)
Public sector assistance and incentives (22-24)
Best practices for the public sector (25-28)
Chapter 4: How the Location Selection Process Works (29-29)
Site selection: the big picture (30-30)
Stages of site selection (31-31)
Planning and strategy (32-33)
Network modeling and analysis (34-34)
Location screening (35-35)
Field and site analysis (36-36)
Cost modeling (37-37)
Incentives, negotiations, and final selection (38-38)
Chapter 5: How Candidate Sites Are Evaluated (39-39)
Ability to access key markets or customers (40-42)
Interaction with transportation networks (43-47)
Labor and workforce (48-48)
Total cost environment (49-49)
Availability and cost of suitable facilities (50-51)
Tax environment (52-52)
Weighing site selection factors (53-54)
Changing role of the freight facility (55-55)
Changes in global sourcing (56-57)
Fuel costs and environmental factors (58-59)
Computer model use and sophistication (60-60)
Transportation network congestion (61-61)
Competition with other types of development (62-62)
Appendix A: List of private sector interviewees (63-63)
Appendix B: Glossary of terms (64-69)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (70-70)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 48
Labor and workforce Every freight facility is different, but labor skills, costs, and the overall workforce environment can play a key role in location selection. While some forms of freight facilities are highly automated or do not have high skill requirements, others involve assembly, manufacturing, value-added processing, or other operations where the availability of a trained talent pool may be a significant requirement. Freight facilities can require a wide variety of employee talents, Freight facilities can require a depending upon the exact nature of the facility. Such skilled wide variety of employee talents, employees may include forklift operators, assemblers, truck drivers, depending upon the exact nature machinists, mechanics, technicians, material handling specialists, and of the facility. Skills required engineers in addition to unskilled labor. may include forklift operators, assemblers, truck drivers, In evaluating locations, companies may first examine data from the machinists, mechanics, technicians, Department of Labor and Department of Commerce regarding material handling specialists, and overall employment for a region or community. This information engineers in addition to unskilled indicates the overall labor market health of the community and may labor. also give indications as to the general level of labor costs. For example, Family Dollar partially selected a distribution center site based on the workforce characteristics in and around Marianna, Florida. Family Dollar received over 6,000 applications for the 515 available jobs. Similarly, Old Dominion, a national trucking firm, chose a site in Morristown, Tennessee, over a Nashville site primarily because of the greater availability of workforce in Morristown. The Morristown area of Tennessee has a strong furniture manufacturing history, and, at the time that Old Dominion was considering developing a regional hub, furniture manufacturing was decreasing in the area and moving overseas. This left a large pool of former manufacturing employees who were available and trainable for employment at the new distribution center. Companies may speak directly with peer companies in the local market to better understand local salary trends, best practices for attracting and retaining key talent, and to determine unionization trends. They may also examine the education infrastructure to determine overall 48 Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials