National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Hodge, Daniel, Steele, Christopher W, Transportation Research Board. "Weighing site selection factors." NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
53
bottomleft bottomright
Page
53
Front Matter (R1-R10)
What is the purpose of this guide? (1-2)
Who should use this guide? (3-3)
How to use this guide (4-4)
What do we mean by freight facilities? (5-9)
Keys to freight facility development success (10-10)
Chapter 2: Evaluating Freight Facility Impacts and Benefits (11-12)
Economic effects (13-13)
Transportation effects (14-15)
Other public sector costs (16-16)
Chapter 3: The Critical Roles of Groundwork and Collaboration (17-18)
Laying the groundwork (19-21)
Public sector assistance and incentives (22-24)
Best practices for the public sector (25-28)
Chapter 4: How the Location Selection Process Works (29-29)
Site selection: the big picture (30-30)
Stages of site selection (31-31)
Planning and strategy (32-33)
Network modeling and analysis (34-34)
Location screening (35-35)
Field and site analysis (36-36)
Cost modeling (37-37)
Incentives, negotiations, and final selection (38-38)
Chapter 5: How Candidate Sites Are Evaluated (39-39)
Ability to access key markets or customers (40-42)
Interaction with transportation networks (43-47)
Labor and workforce (48-48)
Total cost environment (49-49)
Availability and cost of suitable facilities (50-51)
Tax environment (52-52)
Weighing site selection factors (53-54)
Changing role of the freight facility (55-55)
Changes in global sourcing (56-57)
Fuel costs and environmental factors (58-59)
Computer model use and sophistication (60-60)
Transportation network congestion (61-61)
Competition with other types of development (62-62)
Appendix A: List of private sector interviewees (63-63)
Appendix B: Glossary of terms (64-69)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (70-70)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 53
real estate property taxes may drive these parcels into non-freight development and push freight facilities into the urban fringe. High personal property taxes can also be a concern if inventory is taxed as personal property. Public sector assistance and incentives Public sector assistance in the form of tax credits, grants, low-cost loans, training programs, utility discounts, and infrastructure development is often used by a community to gain advantage over a competitor. When competing sites are rated relatively equal, incentives offered When competing sites are rated by the public sector may help close the deal. relatively equal, incentives offered by the public sector may Climate and natural hazards help close the deal. In order to understand business interruption risks, companies will collect data on the region's climate, natural hazards, and historic information on how these have impacted business closures in past years. Few areas are without some form of natural hazard risk, and companies will sometimes compile data on excessive heat, cold, rain, snowfall, earthquake, wildfire, tornado, hurricane, or other relevant data to develop appropriate mitigation (and recovery) plans. Weighing site selection factors The site selection process and factors apply to all forms of freight facilities in some fashion. Still, how these are applied varies depending on who will use the facility. For example, the availability of labor is a very important factor for a port facility whereas tax incentives generally are of less importance, especially as many ports are publicly owned. Likewise, the transportation network is critically important to a distribution center but permitting and regulations are far less important than they might be to a transload center that may process hazardous materials. Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials 53

OCR for page 54
Table 3 below identifies the relative weight of various factors that will drive the site location decision for each type of freight facility. Public officials should note that factors over which they have some control ­ permitting and regulations, the tax environment, incentives and other forms of assistance ­ are generally a less important factor than access to markets, transportation networks, and a workforce when location decisions are being made. Table 3. Site Selection Criteria by Facility Type Type of Logistics Facility Distribution Intermodal Transload Location Criteria Center Port Terminal Terminal ILC Hub Terminal City Terminal Ability to Access Key Markets or Customers Interaction with Transportation Network Labor and Workforce Total Cost Environment Availability and Cost of Suitable Facilities Utilities Permitting and Regulation Tax Environment Public Sector Assistance and Incentives Climate and Natural Hazards Key Priority of Criteria: Primary Factor Important Factor Lesser Factor 54 Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials