National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials (2011)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Hodge, Daniel, Steele, Christopher W, Transportation Research Board. "Competition with other types of development." NCFRP Report 13: Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
62
bottomleft bottomright
Page
62
Front Matter (R1-R10)
What is the purpose of this guide? (1-2)
Who should use this guide? (3-3)
How to use this guide (4-4)
What do we mean by freight facilities? (5-9)
Keys to freight facility development success (10-10)
Chapter 2: Evaluating Freight Facility Impacts and Benefits (11-12)
Economic effects (13-13)
Transportation effects (14-15)
Other public sector costs (16-16)
Chapter 3: The Critical Roles of Groundwork and Collaboration (17-18)
Laying the groundwork (19-21)
Public sector assistance and incentives (22-24)
Best practices for the public sector (25-28)
Chapter 4: How the Location Selection Process Works (29-29)
Site selection: the big picture (30-30)
Stages of site selection (31-31)
Planning and strategy (32-33)
Network modeling and analysis (34-34)
Location screening (35-35)
Field and site analysis (36-36)
Cost modeling (37-37)
Incentives, negotiations, and final selection (38-38)
Chapter 5: How Candidate Sites Are Evaluated (39-39)
Ability to access key markets or customers (40-42)
Interaction with transportation networks (43-47)
Labor and workforce (48-48)
Total cost environment (49-49)
Availability and cost of suitable facilities (50-51)
Tax environment (52-52)
Weighing site selection factors (53-54)
Changing role of the freight facility (55-55)
Changes in global sourcing (56-57)
Fuel costs and environmental factors (58-59)
Computer model use and sophistication (60-60)
Transportation network congestion (61-61)
Competition with other types of development (62-62)
Appendix A: List of private sector interviewees (63-63)
Appendix B: Glossary of terms (64-69)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (70-70)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 62
While all have experienced transportation network congestion and understand where it is, there is frequently an inability to use this information in a meaningful way in simulating distribution networks. Another trend that may influence the operation of freight on rail and roadway networks is the increasing level of competition for capacity between freight and passenger movement on both road and rail infrastructure. Competition with other types of development Freight users in some cases are prohibited from locating in ideal freight locations either due to land use prohibitions or conflicts (real or anticipated) with surrounding uses. In many cases, land that had previously been used for freight movement has now been converted to commercial, retail, or even residential use. The remaining developable industrial land becomes subject to increased limitations due to conflict with the new land uses. One example of this trend is the federal government's decision to expand military and associated operations at the Aberdeen Proving Ground and Ft. Meade in Maryland as a result of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) activity. In consequence, land which had previously been used or permitted as warehouse and industrial space along the key Interstate 95 East Coast distribution corridor will now be converted to office development instead of industrial or freight-related use. The opportunity to implement Urban Distribution Centers, with their clear advantages for fuel and carbon efficiency and truck VMT reduction, is dependent on suitable sites, most likely on brownfield properties with established, but perhaps dormant, industrial designation. The risk to such properties from land use conflicts could reduce supply chain performance by social as well as commercial and economic measures. 62 Freight Facility Location Selection: A Guide for Public Officials