Click for next page ( 119


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 118
118 References 1. Washington State DOT, State Rail and Marine Office, Rail Benefit/ 16. Todd Littman, "Climate Change Emission Valuation for Trans- Impact Evaluation Methodology, July 2008. portation Economic Analysis," Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2. U.S.DOT, Guide to Quantifying the Economic Impacts of Federal Victoria, B.C., 2009. Investments in Large-Scale Freight Transportation Projects, http:// 17. Airports Council International (ACI), Airports Council World Airport www.dot.gov/freight/guide061018/. Traffic Report, 2010. 3. "Performance-Based Technology Scanning," Journal of the Trans- 18. City and County of Denver, CO (on behalf of its Department of Avi- portation Research Forum, Vol 57, no. 2 (2003) pp. 119134. ation), "Proposed Issuance of Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 4. AASHTO, UBA-2, A Manual of User Benefit Analysis for Highways, 2008A1-4," April 11, 2008, Appendix B, p. B-28. 2nd ed, Washington, D.C., 2003. 19. HNTB, Economic Development Research Group, and Kramer 5. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Aerotek, Inc., Economic Impact of Airports in Colorado: Final Tech- Washington, D.C., 2000. nical Report 2003, Call Number: TRA10.2/EC7/2003/2, Colorado 6. Cambridge Econometrics, Transport Infrastructure and Policy Macro- Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, 2003. economic Analysis for the EU, European Commission, Brussels, 20. Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc., Kramer Aerotek, Inc., and the Metro- pp. 1936, 2003. politan College of Denver, The Economic Impact of Airports in Col- 7. Martino et al., Macro-Economic Impact of the White Paper Policies, orado 2008, Colorado Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics, May 2008, p. 20. Annex XII of ASSESS Final Report, DG TREN, European Commis- 21. Lawson Economics Research, Inc., Special Report 291: Great Lakes sion, Brussels, pp. 1922, 2005. Shipping, Trade, and Aquatic Invasive Species--The Environmental 8. Scott Lindall, Doug Olson, and Greg Alward, "Multi-Regional Footprint of Surface Freight Transportation, Transportation Research Models: The IMPLAN National Trade Flows Model," Proceed- Board, June 2007. ings of the 2005 MCRSA/SRSA Meetings, Arlington, VA, April 22. TranSafety, Inc., Road Engineering Journal, http://www.usroads.com/ 2005. journals/p/rej/9710/re971001.htm1997. 9. Hendrick, Chris. Project Management for Construction, Upper 23. Parsons Brinckerhoff, Louisiana DOTD, Five-Year Ports and Maritime Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2008. Plan, December 2009, p. 13. 10. City of Reno, Reno Transportation Rail Access Corridor Final Environ- 24. U.S.DOT, FAA, Economic Values of FAA Investment and Regulatory mental Impact Statement, 2001. Program, June 1998. 11. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics values for specific occupations, plus 25. Keivan Deravi, The Economic Impact of Birmingham-Shuttlesworth fringe benefits, http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0910.pdf. International Airport, Auburn University in Montgomery, June 12. U.S.DOT, Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, August 31, 2008, pp. 23. 2000. 26. http://www.airportimprovement.com/content/story.php?article= 13. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010. 00104. 14. http://www.frontierairlines.com/frontier/pdf/SystemCargoRates_ 27. http://www.hsvairport.org/iic/ac_intro.html. 012010.pdf. 28. Martin Associates, The Local and Regional Economic Impacts of the 15. FHWA, 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study Final Report Port of Houston, Lancaster, PA., pp. 2329, 2002. Addendum, Federal Highway Administration, U.S.DOT, 2000. 29. FHWA, Financing Freight Improvements, January 2007.