National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 37A: Guidebook for Measuring Performance of Automated People Mover Systems at Airports (2012)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "6.2 Measures for Planning and Designing Airport APM Systems." ACRP Report 37A: Guidebook for Measuring Performance of Automated People Mover Systems at Airports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
51
bottomleft bottomright
Page
51
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-3)
1.1 Research Approach (4-5)
2.3 How to Use This Guidebook (6-6)
2.4 Other ACRP Reports (7-7)
3.1.1 Legal Precedents (8-8)
3.1.2 O&M Contract Durations (9-9)
3.2 Procurement of O&M Services: Contractual Options (10-10)
3.2.3 Option 3: In-Sourcing O&M Services to Airport Staff (11-11)
3.3 Measurement of O&M Procurement Methodology Criteria (12-12)
3.3.1 Measurement Factor: Cost (13-13)
3.3.2 Measurement Factor: Risk (14-15)
3.3.3 Measurement Factor: Other (16-17)
3.3.4 Summary (18-18)
3.4 O&M Contract's Relationship to Performance Measurement (19-19)
4.1.1 Applied Methods (20-21)
4.1.2 Theoretical Methods (22-22)
4.2 Characteristics of Effective Performance Measurement Systems for APM Systems at Airports (23-23)
5.1.3 Routes Operated in Maximum Service (24-24)
5.2 Service Descriptive Characteristics (25-25)
5.2.4 Vehicles Available for Maximum Service (26-26)
5.3.1 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier A Approach) (27-29)
5.3.2 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier B Approach) (30-33)
5.3.3 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier C Approach) (34-37)
5.3.4 Airport APM Performance Measure #2: Safety Incidents per 1,000 Vehicle Service Miles (38-39)
5.3.5 Airport APM Performance Measure #3: O&M Expense per Vehicle Service Mile (40-41)
5.3.6 Airport APM Performance Measure #4: Actual and Scheduled Capacity (Peak Versus All Other) (42-43)
5.3.7 Airport APM Performance Measure #5: Passenger Satisfaction (44-45)
5.3.8 Airport APM Performance Measure #6: Missed Stations per 1,000 Station Stops (46-47)
5.3.9 Airport APM Performance Measure #7: Unintended Stops per 1,000 Interstations (48-49)
6.1 Internal Measures for Assessing and Improving Performance of Airport APM Systems (50-50)
6.2 Measures for Planning and Designing Airport APM Systems (51-51)
7.2 Administrative and Funding Issues (52-52)
7.3 Airport Participation Issues (53-53)
7.4 Data Collection and Reporting Issues (54-54)
7.5 Conclusions (55-55)
Bibliography (56-56)
Acronyms and Abbreviations (57-57)
Exhibit A - Form A, Form B, and Passenger Satisfaction Survey (58-62)
Appendix A (63-65)
Section 1 - Preface (66-66)
2.1.1 Balanced Scoreboard (67-67)
2.2.1 Applied Methods (68-68)
2.2.1.2 Contract Service Dependability Method (69-69)
2.2.1.3 System Service Availability Method (70-70)
2.2.2.2 Defining and Measuring Service Availability for Complex Transportation Networks (71-71)
2.3.1 Historical Development (72-72)
2.3.2.2 Conferences on Transportation Performance Measures (73-73)
2.3.2.3 National Transit Database (74-74)
2.4 Airline Performance Measurement (75-75)
2.4.1 Government-Monitored Measures (76-76)
2.4.2 Airport Operator/Airline Measures (77-77)
2.5.1 FHWA Performance Measurement Program (78-79)
2.5.1.2 Buffer and Planning Time Indices (80-80)
2.5.2.3 Throughout (81-81)
2.6 Conclusion (82-83)
3.2 APMs (84-84)
3.4 Airlines (85-85)
3.5 Highways (86-86)
4.1.3 Select APM Systems for Site Visits (87-88)
4.2.2 Conduct Site Visits (89-89)
4.3.3 Step 3: Report to ACRP Panel on Participation Ratio (90-90)
4.3.10 Step 10: Transmit Thank-You Letters to Respondents (91-91)
5.1.2 Section 2: Performance Measures (92-92)
5.1.4 Section 4: Suggestions for Improving APM Performance Measures (93-93)
5.1.5 Section 5: System and Operating Characteristics (94-94)
5.2.2 System and Operating Characteristics (95-99)
5.2.4 Performance Measures (100-104)
5.2.6 Suggestions for Improving Airport APM Performance Measures (105-105)
Section 6 - Airport APM Survey (106-125)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (126-126)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 51
51 be expected for a certain period until the cause is identified by satisfying the high targets set for these service availability and rectified, but it would likely be a measure that would not performance measures. have otherwise been implemented nor permanently instituted Similarly, certain airport APM systems have the capabil had the spike in failures not have occurred. ity to automatically couple APM vehicles into larger train consists and immediately insert these trains into service to rapidly respond to either increased demand in the system or 6.2Measures for Planning and to degraded operational modes brought on by one or more Designing Airport APM Systems mainline failures. This automated coupling feature, along with APMs play a critical role in transporting passengers effi the crossover quantity/placement issue mentioned previously, ciently and safely at airports and therefore need to be highly can allow a system to be rapidly reconfigured and maintain dependable and safe. The measures that can be used for plan the same line capacity in a degraded operational mode as in ning and designing airport APM systems largely include the nominal operational modes. The consideration of this feature availability-, reliability-, and maintainability-type measures in the planning and design phases of an airport APM is again similar to those discussed in previous sections of the guidebook. driven, in part, by satisfying the high targets set for the avail For example, during the planning and design phases of an ability performance measures. airport APM system, APM system suppliers determine the Safety is also extensively considered in the planning and dependability, availability, reliability, and/or maintainability design of airport APM systems, and performance measures are values of subcomponents, equipment, and subsystems, based used to quantify and verify during the design phase that hazards on certain anticipated failure rates, to verify that the overall sys are limited to essentially negligible levels. For example, the tem will meet the target of the particular performance measure mean time between hazard element (MTBHE) performance once service is established. Often, these targets are stringent measure is used, in part, to verify and validate that the duration due to the critical role APM systems play at airports. of time between hazard elements for the ATC system meets or When planning APMs, such high performance standards can exceeds the required level. be considered in developing alignments and configurations that Other measures that can be considered during the planning will allow APM system suppliers to provide the equipment and and design of an airport APM system include the walk distance equipment redundancies necessary to ensure that the system to airport APM stations, number of level changes to and from will perform at these levels. For example, there could be several the APM station, the APM platform size and configuration crossovers in an airport APM system that allow APM vehicles to [i.e., center platform, side platforms, triple (flow-through) operate around a failed section of track and still move passen platforms, etc.], ultimate design line capacity of the system, gers among airport facilities fairly efficiently. The consideration travel time, and passenger vehicle space allocations. These of crossover quantities and placement during the planning are discussed in ACRP Report 37: Guidebook for Planning and and design phases of an airport APM system is driven, in part, Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports.