National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

ACRP Report 37A: Guidebook for Measuring Performance of Automated People Mover Systems at Airports (2012)
Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Bibliography." ACRP Report 37A: Guidebook for Measuring Performance of Automated People Mover Systems at Airports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
56
bottomleft bottomright
Page
56
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-3)
1.1 Research Approach (4-5)
2.3 How to Use This Guidebook (6-6)
2.4 Other ACRP Reports (7-7)
3.1.1 Legal Precedents (8-8)
3.1.2 O&M Contract Durations (9-9)
3.2 Procurement of O&M Services: Contractual Options (10-10)
3.2.3 Option 3: In-Sourcing O&M Services to Airport Staff (11-11)
3.3 Measurement of O&M Procurement Methodology Criteria (12-12)
3.3.1 Measurement Factor: Cost (13-13)
3.3.2 Measurement Factor: Risk (14-15)
3.3.3 Measurement Factor: Other (16-17)
3.3.4 Summary (18-18)
3.4 O&M Contract's Relationship to Performance Measurement (19-19)
4.1.1 Applied Methods (20-21)
4.1.2 Theoretical Methods (22-22)
4.2 Characteristics of Effective Performance Measurement Systems for APM Systems at Airports (23-23)
5.1.3 Routes Operated in Maximum Service (24-24)
5.2 Service Descriptive Characteristics (25-25)
5.2.4 Vehicles Available for Maximum Service (26-26)
5.3.1 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier A Approach) (27-29)
5.3.2 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier B Approach) (30-33)
5.3.3 Airport APM Performance Measure #1: Service Availability (Tier C Approach) (34-37)
5.3.4 Airport APM Performance Measure #2: Safety Incidents per 1,000 Vehicle Service Miles (38-39)
5.3.5 Airport APM Performance Measure #3: O&M Expense per Vehicle Service Mile (40-41)
5.3.6 Airport APM Performance Measure #4: Actual and Scheduled Capacity (Peak Versus All Other) (42-43)
5.3.7 Airport APM Performance Measure #5: Passenger Satisfaction (44-45)
5.3.8 Airport APM Performance Measure #6: Missed Stations per 1,000 Station Stops (46-47)
5.3.9 Airport APM Performance Measure #7: Unintended Stops per 1,000 Interstations (48-49)
6.1 Internal Measures for Assessing and Improving Performance of Airport APM Systems (50-50)
6.2 Measures for Planning and Designing Airport APM Systems (51-51)
7.2 Administrative and Funding Issues (52-52)
7.3 Airport Participation Issues (53-53)
7.4 Data Collection and Reporting Issues (54-54)
7.5 Conclusions (55-55)
Bibliography (56-56)
Acronyms and Abbreviations (57-57)
Exhibit A - Form A, Form B, and Passenger Satisfaction Survey (58-62)
Appendix A (63-65)
Section 1 - Preface (66-66)
2.1.1 Balanced Scoreboard (67-67)
2.2.1 Applied Methods (68-68)
2.2.1.2 Contract Service Dependability Method (69-69)
2.2.1.3 System Service Availability Method (70-70)
2.2.2.2 Defining and Measuring Service Availability for Complex Transportation Networks (71-71)
2.3.1 Historical Development (72-72)
2.3.2.2 Conferences on Transportation Performance Measures (73-73)
2.3.2.3 National Transit Database (74-74)
2.4 Airline Performance Measurement (75-75)
2.4.1 Government-Monitored Measures (76-76)
2.4.2 Airport Operator/Airline Measures (77-77)
2.5.1 FHWA Performance Measurement Program (78-79)
2.5.1.2 Buffer and Planning Time Indices (80-80)
2.5.2.3 Throughout (81-81)
2.6 Conclusion (82-83)
3.2 APMs (84-84)
3.4 Airlines (85-85)
3.5 Highways (86-86)
4.1.3 Select APM Systems for Site Visits (87-88)
4.2.2 Conduct Site Visits (89-89)
4.3.3 Step 3: Report to ACRP Panel on Participation Ratio (90-90)
4.3.10 Step 10: Transmit Thank-You Letters to Respondents (91-91)
5.1.2 Section 2: Performance Measures (92-92)
5.1.4 Section 4: Suggestions for Improving APM Performance Measures (93-93)
5.1.5 Section 5: System and Operating Characteristics (94-94)
5.2.2 System and Operating Characteristics (95-99)
5.2.4 Performance Measures (100-104)
5.2.6 Suggestions for Improving Airport APM Performance Measures (105-105)
Section 6 - Airport APM Survey (106-125)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (126-126)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 56
56 Bibliography American Society of Civil Engineers. Automated People Mover Henderson, G., P. Kwong, and H. Adkins. "Regularity Indices for Standards--Part 1. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, Evaluating Transit Performance." Transportation Research Record 2006. 1297. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, Anderson, J.E. "Dependability as a Measure of On-Time Performance of pp. 3­9. Personal Rapid Transit Systems." Journal of Advanced Transportation, Howell, J.K. "RAM: Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability of APM 26, 1992, Institute for Transportation, Inc. Systems." 2nd International Conference on Automated People Chang, H.W., R.D. Banker, and W.W. Cooper. "Simulation Studies of Movers, March 1989, American Society of Civil Engineers. Miami. Efficiency and Returns to Scale with Nonlinear Functions in DEA," Kaplan, R., and D. Norton. "The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Annals of Operations Research, 1995. Drive Performance." Harvard Business Review. Vol. 70, Issue 1 Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E., Rhodes. "Measuring the Efficiency of (Jan/Feb 1992), pp. 71­79. Decision-Making Units." European Journal of Operational Research, Lee, D.B. "Transit Cost and Performance Measurement." Transport 1978. Reviews, Vol. 9, No. 2. Taylor & Francis Limited, 1989. Chicago O'Hare International Airport. AGT System Technical Provisions. Lede, N.W., and L. Yu. A Manual for Evaluating Personalized Public Undated. Transit Systems. Federal Transit Administration, Texas Southern Chicago O'Hare International Airport. How to Count the Availability. University, and Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 1992. 1993. Litman, T. "Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility, and Accessibil- Chu, X., G.J. Fielding, and B.W. Lamar. "Measuring Transit Performance ity." The ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 10, October 2003, pp. 28­32. Using Data Envelopment Analysis." California University, Irvine, 1990. Liu, R., R. Pendyala, and S. Polzin. "A Simulation of the Effects of Cottrell, W.D., and Y.J. Nakanishi. "Airport APM Performance Mea- Intermodal Transfer Penalties on Transit Use." Transportation Re- surement: Network Configuration and Service Availability." 11th search Record 1623, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, International Conference on Automated People Movers, Apr. D.C., 1998, pp. 88­95. 2007, American Society of Civil Engineers. Vienna. National Partnership for Reinventing Government. Balancing Measures: Dallas­Fort Worth International Airport. APM System Operations and Best Practices in Performance Management. August 1999. http:// Maintenance General Conditions (Conformed), November 2000. govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/papers/bkgrd/balmeasure.html. Elms, C.P. "Defining and Measuring Service Availability for Complex Accessed October 2007. Transportation Networks." International Conference on PRT & National Performance Review. Serving the American Public: Best Practices Other Emerging Transportation Systems, Nov. 1996. Minneapolis. in Performance Measurement. Benchmarking Study Report. June Federal Highway Administration, Office of Operations. Performance 1997. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/papers/benchmrk/ Measurement Fundamentals. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/perf_ nprbook.html. Accessed October 2007. measurement/fundamentals.htm. Accessed October 2007. Obeng, K. "Total Productive Measurement in Bus Transit: Comment." Frey, H., and A. Levy. An Incentive Approach to Contractual Availability Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 6. American for Downgraded Operation. 9th International Conference on Au- Society of Civil Engineers, 1991. tomated People Movers, Sept. 2003, ALONEX/Aeroports de Paris. Phillips, J.K. "An Application of the Balanced Scorecard to Public Singapore. Transit System Performance Assessment." Transportation Journal, Gosling, G.D., and L. Xiao-Yun. "Modeling Measures to Improve Vol. 43, No. 1. American Society of Transportation and Logistics, Intermodal Connectivity At Airports." University of California at 2004. Berkeley, 2006. Racca, D.P. "Transportation Network Models to Accurately Estimate Government Accountability Office. Performance Measurement and Transit Level of Service (Paper 1921)," Proceedings of the Twenty- Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships. GAO-05-739SP. 2005. Fourth Annual ESRI User Conference, 2004. Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, Orlando International Airport. Takyi, I.K. "A Multi-Dimensional Methodology for Evaluating Public Phase II Expansion, Automated Guideway Transit System, Part 4-- Transportation Services." Transportation Research. Part A: Policy O&M Contract Provisions. 1987. and Practice, Vol. 27, No. 5. Pergamon Press plc; Elsevier, 1993.