Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 131


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 130
References 1. Willson, Richard and Menotti, Val. Commuter Parking Versus Transit-Oriented Development: Evaluation Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2021, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 118125. 2. Ragovin, I. "Getting Around Gets Easier." Planning American Planning Associations, Feb. 2011. 3. Kathryn F. Turnbull, Richard H. Pratt, John E. Evans, IV, and Herbert S. Levinson. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Chapter 3--Park-and-Ride/Pool. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2004. 4. Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., Cambridge Systematics Inc., and NuStats International. "RT-HIS Regional Travel--Household Interview Survey." Executive Summary General, Final Report. Prepared for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council and the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, February, 2000. 5. Ferguson, E. "Parking Management and Commuter Rail: The Case of Northeastern Illinois." Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2000. 6. McCollom Management Consulting, Inc. "Transit Performance Monitoring System: First Phase Testing" (draft report). Prepared for the American Public Transit Association. APTA, Washington, DC, March, 1999. 7.Caltrain. 2001 Caltrain Origin and Destination Study. Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, San Carlos, CA, August 20, 2003. 8. BART Customer and Performance Research. BART Station Profile Study. Final Report. Oakland, CA, August, 1999. 9. Houston-Galveston Area Council. "Regional Travel Models--1995 Model Validation and Documentation Report." Supplemental tabulations prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff: "HGAC Model Development, Mode Choice Calibration Targets, Mode Availability by Purpose and Time Period." Houston, TX, February, 2001. 10. United States Census 2000 Demographic Profiles. 11. Wilson, A. P. CTPS Technical Report 47: An Impact Analysis of the Opening of the Quincy Adams Rapid-Transit System. Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston, MA, 1984. 12. Cervero, R. Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California. Monograph 45. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, 1993. 13. Loutzenheiser, O. "Redistributing Access to Transit: A Model of Walk Trips and their Design and Urban Form Determinates Around BART Stations." Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1997. 14. Evans, John E., Richard H. Pratt, Andrew Stryker, and J. Richard Kuzmayak. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Chapter 17--Transit Oriented Development. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2004. 15. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). Metrorail Passenger Surveys: Average Weekday Passenger Boardings. Spreadsheets, June 6, 2002 and June 14, 2006b. 16. Levinson, H. S., and Weant, R. A. Transportation and Parking Demand Analysis for Bridgeport Intermodal Transportation Center. Prepared for Wallace Floyd Design Group, Boston, MA, August 30, 2000. 17. Kittelson Assoc. Inc., Herbert S. Levinson, and DMJM + Harris. Chapter 3 in TCRP Report 118: Bus Rapid Transit Practitioners Guide, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2009. 18. KFH Group, Inc. TCRP Report 99: Embracing Change in a Changing World. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2004. 19. Krambles, G., and Peterson, A.A. CTA at 45. George Krambles Scholarship Foundation, 1993. 20. Levinson, Herbert, Samuel Zimmerman, Jennifer Clinger, Scott Rutherford, Rodney L. Smith, John Cracknell, and Richard Soberman. TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid Transit Volume I: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2003. 130

OCR for page 130
References 131 21. Arrington, G.B. and R. Cervero. TCRP Report 128: Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2008. 22. Cervero, Robert, Steven Murphy, Christopher Ferrell, Natasha Goguts, Yu-Hsin Tsai, G.B. Arrington, John Boroski, Janet Smith-Heimer, Ron Golem, Paul Peninger, Eric Nakajima, Ener Chui, Robert Dunphy, Mel Myers, Shannon McKay, and Nicole Witenstein. TCRP Report 102: Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2004. 23.DRAFT--FasTracks TOD Lessons Learned Report, March, 2010. 24.Trimet. Community Building Source Book--Land Use and Transportation Initiatives in Portland, 2005. 25. Cervero, Robert and G.B. Arrington. Vehicle Trip Reduction Impacts of Transit-Oriented Housing. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2008. 26. The Ground Floor, Parking and Neighborhoods Should Be The Focus of TOD. April 5, 2000 27. Evans, J.E., IV, and Stryker A. TCRP Project B-12B Technical Report 1, Prepared for Richard H. Pratt, March 2005. 28. Borowski, J., T Faulkner, G. Arrington, S. Mori, F. Parker, and D. Mayer. Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study--Factors for Success in California: Special Report: Parking and TOD. Prepared for California Department of Transportation by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Faulkner/Conrad Group, February 2002. 29. Millard-Ball A., and Siegman P. Playing the Numbers Game. Planning Magazine, American Planning Association, May, 2006. 30. Transportation Planning Handbook, 3rd Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Washington, DC, 2008. 31. Cottrell, Wayne D. Transforming a Bus Station into a Transit-Oriented Development: Improving Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Connections. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2006. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2007, pp. 114121. 32. Coffel, Kathryn, Jamie Parks, Conor Semler, David Sampson, Chris Henry, Guillermo Calves, Carol Kachadoorian, Herbert Levinson, and Joseph Schofer. TCRP Web-Only Document 44: Literature Review for Providing Access to Public Transit Stations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2009. 33. Schlossberg, Marc, Asha Weinstein Agrawal, Katja Irvin, and Vanessa Louise Bekkouch. How Far, by Which Route, and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA, 2007. 34. Bay Area Rapid Transit. BART Station Access Guidelines, San Francisco, CA, 2003. 35. Pucher, John, Ralph Buehler, and Mark Seinen. Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An Update and Re-Appraisal of Cycling Trends and Policies, Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 45, 2011 (in press). 36. Debrezion, Ghebreegziabiher, Eric A.J.H. Pels, and Pie Rietveld. Modelling the Joint Access Mode and Railway Station Choice. Tinbergen Institute, Discussion Paper No. 07-012/3, January 2007. 37. Park, Sungjin and Junhee Kang. Factors that Influence Walking and Biking to the Station: Modeling Commuter Rail Users' Access Mode Choice. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January, 2008. 38. Nankervis, Max. The Effect of Weather and Climate on Bicycle Commuting, Transportation Research Part A, pp. 417431, 1999. 39. Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Bicycle Transportation Strategic Plan. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2006. 40. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Dr. Katherine Hunter-Zaworski. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2003. 41. Levinson, H.S., C.L. Adams, and W.F. Hoey. NCHRP Report 155: Bus Use of Highways: Planning and Design Guidelines. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1975. 42. Weant R.A. and H.S. Levinson. Parking. ENO Transportation Foundation, Westport, CT, 1990. 43. Levinson, H.S., J.S. Gluck, and W. Ng. Park-and-Ride, Kiss-and-Ride, and Change of Mode Facilities. In Parking Management--Planning, Design, and Operations, International Parking Institute Inc., Fredericksburg, VA, 2009. 44. Bowler Charles, E., Errol C. Noel, Richard Peterson, and Dennis Christiansen. Park-and-Ride Facilities- Guidelines for Planning, Design, and Operation. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 1986. 45. City of Calgary. 1998 Park-and-Ride Lot Inventory. Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1998. 46. Report on New Haven Line Parking Expansion. Connecticut Department of Transportation, Hartford, CT, 1997. 47. Parking at DART Transit Centers, Park and Ride Lots, Rail Station. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX, 1998.

OCR for page 130
132 Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations 48. Dickins, I. Light Rapid Transit and Strategic Park and Ride: A Modern System. Proceedings of Light Rail '93 Conference, Birmingham, England, 1994. 49. Foote, P. J. Chicago Transit Authority Weekday Park-and-Ride Users: Choice Market with Ridership Growth Potential. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1735, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2000, pp. 158168. 50. Parking Management-Utilization Statistics-February 1998. Go Transit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1998. 51. 1993 Park-Ride Facilities. Metro-Dade Transit Authority, Miami, FL, 1993. 52. Metropolitan Transit Development Board. Metropolitan Transit Development Board, San Diego, CA, 1999. 53. Washington Regional Park-and-Ride 1995 Inventory and Analysis. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC, 1996. 54. "1994...," "1995...," "1996...," "1997...," and "1998 Park-and-Ride Utilization Summary." Tabulations, Regional Transit District, Denver, CO, 1999. 55. 2009 Park and Ride Survey. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, San Jose, CA, 2009. 56. Parking Pricing Study. Sound Transit, Seattle, WA, 2010. 57. Turnbull, K. F., P. A. Turner, and N. F. Lindquist. Investigation of Land Use, Development, and Parking Policies to Support the Use of High-Occupancy Vehicles in Texas. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, 1995. 58. City of Ottawa Transportation and Infrastructure Planning: Park-And-Ride Facilities for Ottawa Part 1: Best Practices and Policy Directions. ITrans Consulting, Inc., Ottawa, Canada, November 2007. 59. This Week's Survey Results--Characteristics of Successful Park-and-Ride Lots. Urban Transportation Monitor, Vol. 17, No. 11, June 13, 2003b. 60. RTD Transit Access Guidelines--Regional Transit District, Denver, CO, January 2004.