National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 707: Guidelines on the Use of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections (2012)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Rouphail, Nagui, Nevers, Brandon, Bonneson, Jim, Schroeder, Bastian, Steyn, Hermanus, Mereszczak, Yuri, Clark, Zach, Hummer, Joe, Bugg, Zach, Rhodes, Danica, Transportation Research Board. "Configuration Types." NCHRP Report 707: Guidelines on the Use of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
7
bottomleft bottomright
Page
7

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 7
Passive Taper: The ATL taper upstream of the intersection that allows vehicles to enter the ATL. Active Taper: The ATL taper downstream of the intersection that requires vehicles to merge. XT: The demand-to-capacity ratio for the through movement assuming the ATL is not in place. APPLICATION Similar to CTLs, ATLs are implemented to increase the stop-bar capacity on approaches at signalized intersections that represent a "choke point" along an arterial street. They can be applied in urban, suburban, or rural environments on either the major-street or minor-street approach. ATLs are often applied in lieu of a CTL when: · Construction of a CTL is not feasible; · The capacity added by the ATL adequately accommodates current or projected traffic demand through the intersection bottleneck; and · Sufficient length is available to accommodate upstream storage and downstream merge activity. CONFIGURATION TYPES These guidelines address four types of ATL configurations as shown in Exhibit 2-1: · One CTL with a shared ATL · One CTL, one ATL, and an exclusive right-turn lane · Two CTLs with a shared ATL · Two CTLs, one ATL, and an exclusive right-turn lane Page 8

OCR for page 8
Exhibit 2-1 ATL Configuration Types One CTL with Shared ATL One CTL, One ATL, and Exclusive Right-Turn Lane Two CTLs with Shared ATL Two CTLs, One ATL, and Exclusive Right-Turn Lane Each of the configurations shown in Exhibit 2-1 consists of a right-hand lane addition upstream of the intersection and a right-hand merge downstream of the intersection. Results from a web survey conducted as part of this research effort found that 85 percent of ATL applications had both a right-hand lane addition upstream and right-hand merge downstream. The remaining sites included right-turn drop lanes downstream that generally ended at a commercial driveway entrance or left-hand merges. The guidelines presented in this document do not address ATLs with right-turn drop lanes and left-hand merges given the relatively few known applications of that configuration. Page 9