National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: APPENDIX C: PPP LEGISLATION
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"ACRONYMS." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Competition Requirements of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14639.
×
Page 53
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"ACRONYMS." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. Competition Requirements of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14639.
×
Page 54

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

53 ACRONYMS ACG Associated General Contractors of America Agency CM Agency construction management ASBCA Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ARTC (ATC) Air Rail Transit Consortium BAFO Best and final offer BART Bay Area Rapid Transit BATC Bay Area Transit Consultants BOT Build-operate-transfer BRT Bus rapid transit CA Comprehensive agreement CAPRA Capital reserve account CMAR Construction-Manager-at Risk COM Contractor operations and maintenance CTB Commonwealth Transportation Board (of Vir- ginia) CTC California Transportation Commission DART Dallas Area Rapid Transit DB Design-build DBB Design-bid-build DBE Disadvantaged business enterprises DBOM Design-build-operate-maintain DIA Dulles International Airport DRB Dispute resolution board DRPT Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation DTP Dulles Transit Partners EBD Escrowed bid documents EC Evaluation committee FA Fleet availability FAA Federal Aviation Administration FFGA Full funding grant agreement FTA Federal Transit Administration GEC General engineering consultant GMP Guaranteed maximum price LFA Local funding agreement LGS Lane, Granite, Slattery, Skanska joint enter- prise LRT Light rail transit MAX Metropolitan Area Express MWAA Metropolitan Washington Airports Author- ity NASFA National Association of State Facilities Ad- ministration NPV Net present value NPVT Final net present value O&M Operation and maintenance ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation ORD Operations readiness date OTP On-time performance PATCO Port Authority Transit Corporation PFC Passenger facility charges PPP Public-private partnership PPTA Virginia’s Public Private Transportation Act QA/QC plans Quality control measures RDA Route daily availability REA Request for equitable adjustment RFP Request for proposals RFQ Request for qualifications SA Station availability SCADA Supervisory control and data acquisition SEPTA Southeastern Pennsylvania Transit Author- ity SFIA San Francisco International Airport SNJTRLS Southern New Jersey Light Rail Transit System TBD To be determined Trimet Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon ULURP Uniform land use review procedure VECP Value engineering change proposals WMATA Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Next: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS »
Competition Requirements of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Legal Research Digest 39: Competition Requirements of the Design/Build, Construction Manager at Risk, and Public-Private Partnership Contracts—Seven Case Studies explores the use of various project delivery methods, including design-build, construction management at risk, and a number of options considered public-private partnerships, through the examination of seven separate construction projects in various parts of the United States.

The examinations of the seven selected projects are designed to show how particular, and often unique, problems were addressed in each project by utilizing a wide variety of procurement and delivery methods.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!