National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement (2012)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Plumeau, Peter, Berndt, Mark, Bingham, Paul, Weisbrod, Roberta, Rhodes, Suzann S, Bryan, Joe, Cherrett, Thomas J, Transportation Research Board. "Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages." NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
17
bottomleft bottomright
Page
17
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose (1-2)
Why Read the Guidebook (3-3)
How the Guidebook Is Organized (4-5)
A Brief History of Urban Development and Freight in America (6-6)
Urban Goods Movement in the Twenty-First Century (7-7)
Who Is Moving Your Goods? (8-9)
Why Freight Moves: Supporting the New Economy (10-13)
Chapter 3 - Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains (16-16)
Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages (17-17)
Case Illustration 2: Gasoline and Petroleum Fuels Supply Chain (18-19)
Case Illustration 3: Apparel Retail Supply Chain (20-20)
Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain (21-21)
Supply Chain Comparisons (22-28)
Chapter 4 - Using Freight Data for Planning (29-29)
Neighborhood Freight Data (30-32)
Freight Node Data (33-33)
Freight Network Data (34-35)
Freight Flow Data (36-37)
Freight Data Protocols (38-40)
Overview (41-41)
Design Standards (42-43)
Urban Infrastructure Design (44-44)
Land Use and Zoning (45-46)
Urban Truck Regulations (47-51)
Receiving Support or Authorization to Integrate Freight Analysis into the Planning Process (52-52)
Get Organized (53-53)
Summarize the Issues, Problems, and Their Locations (54-55)
Review and Evaluate Current Regulations (56-56)
Identify Potential Solutions and Strategies to Improve Urban Goods Movements (57-61)
Measuring Success (62-63)
Atlanta: Effectively Managing Truck Traffic in the Urban Environment (64-66)
Baltimore: The Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) (67-68)
Toronto: Harmonizing of Loading Area Regulation across a Mega-City (69-73)
Washington, D.C.: Commercial Vehicle Regulation (74-75)
Nashville: Vanderbilt Medical Center - Freight Consolidation (76-78)
London: Reducing Freight Impacts via Out-of-Hours Deliveries (79-82)
Bristol (United Kingdom): Reducing Freight Impacts through Consolidation Centers (83-85)
New York City: Commercial Vehicle Regulation and Off-Peak Delivery (86-88)
Buffalo: Brownfield Redevelopment for a Logistics Hub (89-92)
Case Studies - Key Findings (93-94)
Appendix A - Additional Supply Chain Case Illustrations (95-105)
Appendix B - References and Resources (106-107)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (108-108)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 17
Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains 17 comparative discussion that begins with a table of comparisons for all 12 chains in terms of their major elements. The table identifies · The supply chain, its channel, and types of goods; · Geographic features, main types of facilities, and modes of transportation; · Patterns in the staging of goods and urban delivery; and · Performance features, including expectations, common risks, and enhancement strategies. After the table, short discussions of each of these elements, their differences and shared traits, and significant factors for planning are presented. Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages Overview Consumer soft drink beverages are produced in two steps. First is the manufacture of concen- trate by a parent company, which is also responsible for branding and marketing. Second is the manufacture and packaging of the finished product by a bottling subsidiary or company, which is also responsible for distribution. The major concern for urban goods movement is the second step, which is the focus of the supply chain illustrated here. Each geographic region has a collection of company production and distribution facilities working together to provide a broad range of beverage products to various customers, including stores, restaurants, and vending facilities. Production facilities receive raw materials for beverages and packaging entirely from domestic sources, including concentrate, sweetener, water and gasses, and empty bottles and cans. Water is city water piped in locally; some chemicals and liquid sweet- ener may arrive by rail; everything else arrives by truck, mostly in full loads. There are full distri- bution functions at all production facilities, and there is an additional set of dedicated distribu- tion centers (DCs) that exclusively perform warehousing and delivery. The two facility types work together, and production plants are coordinated as to beverage and packaging types, resulting in a significant amount of cross-shipping of product between locations. Thus, a distribution point-- whether located in a dedicated facility or a bottling plant--will receive finished product in the form of various beverages packaged in glass, plastic bottles, and cans, from multiple plants as well as from producers of specialty beverages the parent company controls. Customer deliveries then originate either from a production facility or a dedicated DC, are handled entirely by the com- pany truck fleet, and are organized and programmed for optimal fleet use within customer ser- vice requirements. Different truck vehicle types are employed for different delivery sizes and functions, broken broadly into bulk (high-volume stores), side loader (convenience store and restaurant), and fill service (vending machine) retail channels. Each truck runs a stem route, typ- ically with multiple stops over the course of a trip, optimized around the customer delivery sched- uling needs. The stem runs to the far end of the route, and then works its way back to the plants or DC with deliveries along the way, and the truck finishes empty. See Exhibit 3-1. Performance Time schedules are set by routing software that optimizes the delivery sequence within cus- tomer time windows, in order to minimize delivery costs. Most customers prefer day deliveries, but windows can be flexible as long as delivery occurs by close of business. Nevertheless, some customers specify early morning delivery, bars and restaurants may prefer afternoon, and ware- house stores demand specific delivery appointments. Schedules are sensitive because delivery windows have specific lengths and deliveries are set in sequence, which can cause delays to cas- cade from one stop to the next. The goal of the route design is to achieve full use of each vehicle