National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement (2012)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Plumeau, Peter, Berndt, Mark, Bingham, Paul, Weisbrod, Roberta, Rhodes, Suzann S, Bryan, Joe, Cherrett, Thomas J, Transportation Research Board. "Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain." NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
21
bottomleft bottomright
Page
21
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose (1-2)
Why Read the Guidebook (3-3)
How the Guidebook Is Organized (4-5)
A Brief History of Urban Development and Freight in America (6-6)
Urban Goods Movement in the Twenty-First Century (7-7)
Who Is Moving Your Goods? (8-9)
Why Freight Moves: Supporting the New Economy (10-13)
Chapter 3 - Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains (16-16)
Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages (17-17)
Case Illustration 2: Gasoline and Petroleum Fuels Supply Chain (18-19)
Case Illustration 3: Apparel Retail Supply Chain (20-20)
Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain (21-21)
Supply Chain Comparisons (22-28)
Chapter 4 - Using Freight Data for Planning (29-29)
Neighborhood Freight Data (30-32)
Freight Node Data (33-33)
Freight Network Data (34-35)
Freight Flow Data (36-37)
Freight Data Protocols (38-40)
Overview (41-41)
Design Standards (42-43)
Urban Infrastructure Design (44-44)
Land Use and Zoning (45-46)
Urban Truck Regulations (47-51)
Receiving Support or Authorization to Integrate Freight Analysis into the Planning Process (52-52)
Get Organized (53-53)
Summarize the Issues, Problems, and Their Locations (54-55)
Review and Evaluate Current Regulations (56-56)
Identify Potential Solutions and Strategies to Improve Urban Goods Movements (57-61)
Measuring Success (62-63)
Atlanta: Effectively Managing Truck Traffic in the Urban Environment (64-66)
Baltimore: The Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) (67-68)
Toronto: Harmonizing of Loading Area Regulation across a Mega-City (69-73)
Washington, D.C.: Commercial Vehicle Regulation (74-75)
Nashville: Vanderbilt Medical Center - Freight Consolidation (76-78)
London: Reducing Freight Impacts via Out-of-Hours Deliveries (79-82)
Bristol (United Kingdom): Reducing Freight Impacts through Consolidation Centers (83-85)
New York City: Commercial Vehicle Regulation and Off-Peak Delivery (86-88)
Buffalo: Brownfield Redevelopment for a Logistics Hub (89-92)
Case Studies - Key Findings (93-94)
Appendix A - Additional Supply Chain Case Illustrations (95-105)
Appendix B - References and Resources (106-107)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (108-108)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 21
Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains 21 Performance The primary issues for the company's urban logistics include traffic congestion (both general and related to construction), timely access to loading docks, and maneuvering space. Megastores are located in major metropolitan areas and deliveries are constrained by limited delivery times. Often, deliveries must be made within less than an hour's time at a specific time of day. Because of prolonged morning and evening rush hours and schedule constraints, the company is often forced to operate simultaneous deliveries to megastores, which increases logistics costs. Docks at delivery locations are rarely sufficient in number, and maneuvering areas are nearly always confined. These space limitations exist at both shopping malls in suburban areas and megastores in the central business district. Older shopping malls often have a common loading dock area shared by many stores, which complicates and constrains deliveries. The most opti- mal loading facilities are newer malls that provide load doors or docks for each store or for a small group of stores. Although late night or early morning deliveries may be an option, trailers and cargo trucks are seldom left loaded and unattended in store loading docks overnight because of security and product theft issues. Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain Overview The aggregate-based construction materials supply chain includes multiple inputs, sources, consolidation points, and transportation modes. The interrelated processes of cement and ready- mix concrete production and transport illustrate this complexity. Cement production occurs in a limited number of locations in the United States and must be sited close to a limestone source. The powdered cement product is typically transported to cement terminals by rail or barge and then brought onward to ready-mix concrete plants by truck. At the same time, aggregate materials are transported to ready-mix concrete plants as another production input. The cement and the aggregates are combined to produce ready-mix concrete: a highly perishable substance. Once a batch is mixed at the production plant, mixer truck drivers have only a few hours to get ready-mix concrete to the construction site and poured in place. See Exhibit 3-4. Performance Supply chain performance is highly dependent on facility siting. Cement production plants are always situated near a limestone supply that ideally is near barge or rail access, for ease of bulk transport. It is also ideal for ready-mix concrete production sites to be located close to aggregate deposits, also to reduce bulk transport costs. Simultaneously, the time-sensitive nature of the final product makes it necessary for ready-mix production sites to be close to destination construction sites. Typically, transport of ready-mix should take no longer than 1 hour for road construction and no longer than 2 hours for residential and commercial construction. This requires that ready- mix concrete plants (which are relatively mobile) be established near points of use and that each facility has a very precise approach to final production and delivery scheduling. Local regulations have become high barriers to efficient production and transport of aggre- gate products. It is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain conditional use permits for the many processes involved. Siting potential facility locations typically requires preventive company actions including street sweeping, dust control measures, backup alarms, pollution controls, and covered stockpiles. As a result, construction of new facilities in optimal locations is both time- consuming and expensive. For instance, because of the increasing complexity of environmental