National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement (2012)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Plumeau, Peter, Berndt, Mark, Bingham, Paul, Weisbrod, Roberta, Rhodes, Suzann S, Bryan, Joe, Cherrett, Thomas J, Transportation Research Board. "Design Standards." NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
42
bottomleft bottomright
Page
42
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose (1-2)
Why Read the Guidebook (3-3)
How the Guidebook Is Organized (4-5)
A Brief History of Urban Development and Freight in America (6-6)
Urban Goods Movement in the Twenty-First Century (7-7)
Who Is Moving Your Goods? (8-9)
Why Freight Moves: Supporting the New Economy (10-13)
Chapter 3 - Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains (16-16)
Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages (17-17)
Case Illustration 2: Gasoline and Petroleum Fuels Supply Chain (18-19)
Case Illustration 3: Apparel Retail Supply Chain (20-20)
Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain (21-21)
Supply Chain Comparisons (22-28)
Chapter 4 - Using Freight Data for Planning (29-29)
Neighborhood Freight Data (30-32)
Freight Node Data (33-33)
Freight Network Data (34-35)
Freight Flow Data (36-37)
Freight Data Protocols (38-40)
Overview (41-41)
Design Standards (42-43)
Urban Infrastructure Design (44-44)
Land Use and Zoning (45-46)
Urban Truck Regulations (47-51)
Receiving Support or Authorization to Integrate Freight Analysis into the Planning Process (52-52)
Get Organized (53-53)
Summarize the Issues, Problems, and Their Locations (54-55)
Review and Evaluate Current Regulations (56-56)
Identify Potential Solutions and Strategies to Improve Urban Goods Movements (57-61)
Measuring Success (62-63)
Atlanta: Effectively Managing Truck Traffic in the Urban Environment (64-66)
Baltimore: The Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) (67-68)
Toronto: Harmonizing of Loading Area Regulation across a Mega-City (69-73)
Washington, D.C.: Commercial Vehicle Regulation (74-75)
Nashville: Vanderbilt Medical Center - Freight Consolidation (76-78)
London: Reducing Freight Impacts via Out-of-Hours Deliveries (79-82)
Bristol (United Kingdom): Reducing Freight Impacts through Consolidation Centers (83-85)
New York City: Commercial Vehicle Regulation and Off-Peak Delivery (86-88)
Buffalo: Brownfield Redevelopment for a Logistics Hub (89-92)
Case Studies - Key Findings (93-94)
Appendix A - Additional Supply Chain Case Illustrations (95-105)
Appendix B - References and Resources (106-107)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (108-108)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 42
42 Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement Exhibit 5-1. Truck unloading in alleyway. Source: Photo by Halcrow. Design Standards Local government planning agencies typically regulate building codes and design standards. Building codes deal with how a building is constructed. These codes focus on establishing require- ments to ensure that a building is safe in terms of structural capacity. Included are codes for electri- cal, heating, ventilation, fire safety, plumbing, and so on inside buildings. Design standards relevant to urban goods movements deal with issues such as the number, location, and design of loading docks and freight elevators, as well as parking lots and related facilities on the site. Loading Docks Older buildings were not designed with loading docks and freight elevators to accommodate recent truck designs or the increased consumer demand for goods. In many, but not all, juris- dictions, design standards have been updated for current needs. Inadequate design of loading docks servicing urban buildings may result in · Blocking roadways: Limited docking space; inadequate turning bay radii; and docking spaces that do not match the height, width, or length requirements of current trucks can have sev- eral unintended impacts. These may result in trucks spending more time on the streets wait- ing to dock and adding to congestion. They may also result in trucks not being able to back completely off a street to load or unload, and thereby blocking the street (see Exhibit 5-2). · Increased congestion: Lack of adequate dock space and freight elevators inside buildings can result in trucks requiring additional time for pickup and delivery of goods and increase con- gestion. If building dock space is too small for current trucks (see Exhibit 5-3), this may force the use of more, smaller vehicles that add to congestion. This also affects the economic effi- ciency of the businesses delivering to the building. Parking Areas Another design issue relates to urban truck parking areas and parking lots. Local design stan- dards may require all parking areas to be paved to control dust and related air pollution from vehicles driving on these surfaces. The cost to pave large areas for truck parking is high, and urban land owners may want to limit this expense and request a variance. These competing needs to balance cost and air quality may not impact mobility and access; they have been identified as

OCR for page 43
Regulations Impacting Urban Goods Movement 43 Exhibit 5-2. Limited docking space and blocked streets. Source: Photo by Wilbur Smith Associates. Exhibit 5-3. Docking space with height mismatch (note position of dock against mud flaps). Source: Wilbur Smith Associates.