National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement (2012)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Plumeau, Peter, Berndt, Mark, Bingham, Paul, Weisbrod, Roberta, Rhodes, Suzann S, Bryan, Joe, Cherrett, Thomas J, Transportation Research Board. "Urban Infrastructure Design." NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
44
bottomleft bottomright
Page
44
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose (1-2)
Why Read the Guidebook (3-3)
How the Guidebook Is Organized (4-5)
A Brief History of Urban Development and Freight in America (6-6)
Urban Goods Movement in the Twenty-First Century (7-7)
Who Is Moving Your Goods? (8-9)
Why Freight Moves: Supporting the New Economy (10-13)
Chapter 3 - Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains (16-16)
Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages (17-17)
Case Illustration 2: Gasoline and Petroleum Fuels Supply Chain (18-19)
Case Illustration 3: Apparel Retail Supply Chain (20-20)
Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain (21-21)
Supply Chain Comparisons (22-28)
Chapter 4 - Using Freight Data for Planning (29-29)
Neighborhood Freight Data (30-32)
Freight Node Data (33-33)
Freight Network Data (34-35)
Freight Flow Data (36-37)
Freight Data Protocols (38-40)
Overview (41-41)
Design Standards (42-43)
Urban Infrastructure Design (44-44)
Land Use and Zoning (45-46)
Urban Truck Regulations (47-51)
Receiving Support or Authorization to Integrate Freight Analysis into the Planning Process (52-52)
Get Organized (53-53)
Summarize the Issues, Problems, and Their Locations (54-55)
Review and Evaluate Current Regulations (56-56)
Identify Potential Solutions and Strategies to Improve Urban Goods Movements (57-61)
Measuring Success (62-63)
Atlanta: Effectively Managing Truck Traffic in the Urban Environment (64-66)
Baltimore: The Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) (67-68)
Toronto: Harmonizing of Loading Area Regulation across a Mega-City (69-73)
Washington, D.C.: Commercial Vehicle Regulation (74-75)
Nashville: Vanderbilt Medical Center - Freight Consolidation (76-78)
London: Reducing Freight Impacts via Out-of-Hours Deliveries (79-82)
Bristol (United Kingdom): Reducing Freight Impacts through Consolidation Centers (83-85)
New York City: Commercial Vehicle Regulation and Off-Peak Delivery (86-88)
Buffalo: Brownfield Redevelopment for a Logistics Hub (89-92)
Case Studies - Key Findings (93-94)
Appendix A - Additional Supply Chain Case Illustrations (95-105)
Appendix B - References and Resources (106-107)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (108-108)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 44
44 Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement a conflict area between planners and industry. Their economic impact on the freight industry should be acknowledged and considered by local decisionmakers. Urban Infrastructure Design Depending on state law and the functional classification of a roadway, the authority and responsibility for the design of local roadways may rest with a local government. It is recog- nized that some state DOTs (West Virginia, Virginia, and a few others) have authority over local roadway design. Federal and most state roadway design regulations are intended to accommodate trucks. Unfortunately, in some cases older roadways and bridges and local road- ways do not meet these design standards (see Exhibit 5-4). Older urban intersections, narrow streets, and alleyways may restrict truck mobility causing trucks to hit poles or signs located on corners or to drive over sidewalks to make turns. In some urban areas, trucks entering a railyard, port, or other private-sector intermodal facility must travel through privately owned parking lots and local facilities over old urban roadways that are difficult to negotiate. Out- dated or insufficient infrastructure design can impact urban freight mobility and access to buildings and facilities and result in · Increased congestion: The additional time trucks may require negotiating turns, avoiding low bridges, and so on may result in congestion and backups on the roadways. Exhibit 5-4. Urban infrastructure design: inadequate curbside parking and inadequate turning radii at intersections. Source: Wilbur Smith Associates.