National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement (2012)
National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP)

Citation Manager

Plumeau, Peter, Berndt, Mark, Bingham, Paul, Weisbrod, Roberta, Rhodes, Suzann S, Bryan, Joe, Cherrett, Thomas J, Transportation Research Board. "Case Studies - Key Findings." NCFRP Report 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
93
bottomleft bottomright
Page
93
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Purpose (1-2)
Why Read the Guidebook (3-3)
How the Guidebook Is Organized (4-5)
A Brief History of Urban Development and Freight in America (6-6)
Urban Goods Movement in the Twenty-First Century (7-7)
Who Is Moving Your Goods? (8-9)
Why Freight Moves: Supporting the New Economy (10-13)
Chapter 3 - Moving Urban Goods: It's All about Supply Chains (16-16)
Case Illustration 1: Soft Drink Beverages (17-17)
Case Illustration 2: Gasoline and Petroleum Fuels Supply Chain (18-19)
Case Illustration 3: Apparel Retail Supply Chain (20-20)
Case Illustration 4: Aggregate-Based Construction Materials Supply Chain (21-21)
Supply Chain Comparisons (22-28)
Chapter 4 - Using Freight Data for Planning (29-29)
Neighborhood Freight Data (30-32)
Freight Node Data (33-33)
Freight Network Data (34-35)
Freight Flow Data (36-37)
Freight Data Protocols (38-40)
Overview (41-41)
Design Standards (42-43)
Urban Infrastructure Design (44-44)
Land Use and Zoning (45-46)
Urban Truck Regulations (47-51)
Receiving Support or Authorization to Integrate Freight Analysis into the Planning Process (52-52)
Get Organized (53-53)
Summarize the Issues, Problems, and Their Locations (54-55)
Review and Evaluate Current Regulations (56-56)
Identify Potential Solutions and Strategies to Improve Urban Goods Movements (57-61)
Measuring Success (62-63)
Atlanta: Effectively Managing Truck Traffic in the Urban Environment (64-66)
Baltimore: The Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) (67-68)
Toronto: Harmonizing of Loading Area Regulation across a Mega-City (69-73)
Washington, D.C.: Commercial Vehicle Regulation (74-75)
Nashville: Vanderbilt Medical Center - Freight Consolidation (76-78)
London: Reducing Freight Impacts via Out-of-Hours Deliveries (79-82)
Bristol (United Kingdom): Reducing Freight Impacts through Consolidation Centers (83-85)
New York City: Commercial Vehicle Regulation and Off-Peak Delivery (86-88)
Buffalo: Brownfield Redevelopment for a Logistics Hub (89-92)
Case Studies - Key Findings (93-94)
Appendix A - Additional Supply Chain Case Illustrations (95-105)
Appendix B - References and Resources (106-107)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (108-108)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 93
Case Studies 93 Erie County's Road to a Bright Future, Hon. Chris Collins, Erie County Executive, available online at http:// www.erie.gov/exec/?rebuild-the-economy/road-to-a-bright-future.html Erie County, Industrial Parks Report, July 2010. Case Studies--Key Findings Key findings from the nine case studies follow. 1. Long-term planning for freight in urban development is essential. Creating protected industrial zones in urban centers where there are restrictions placed by the planning authority on residential, retail, and leisure developments can safeguard commercial centers and attract new business. This policy is particularly applicable to port sites where water- front land, which is vital for vessel management, could be lost to residential development, alter- ing the land use of the area forever. Wherever possible, areas of brownfield land with good multi- modal transportation links should be safeguarded for industrial/commercial use. 2. Harmonizing truck access and loading regulations along with enforcement strategies within and across regions can bring about significant efficiency savings to both the local community and logistics providers. Unifying loading/unloading/waiting restrictions within city areas and across different cities can make urban delivery more efficient, harmonize enforcement strategies, and improve under- standing among logistics providers, their clients, and local authorities. Freight and service vehicles can be catered for in simple ways such as minimum waiting peri- ods for freight vehicles displaying a windshield "service provider" ID card, standardizing load- ing spaces, and allowing hand delivery of parcels using metro and underground services. Simple guidance signage should be considered for aiding truck drivers through urban areas (e.g., green and red route signage to denote acceptable and unacceptable routes respectively). Overweight trucks can be responsible for annual pavement and bridge repair costs of around $16 million in some cities. The implementation of innovative enforcement technologies (e.g., weigh-in-motion scales) can have a significant impact on reducing these costs. When developing a strategic truck route master plan it is important to change the mindset from one of prohibiting commercial vehicles from certain neighborhoods to effectively and effi- ciently accommodating trucks in the urban environment. This is done through dialogue with stakeholders and identifying all possible routes exhibiting truck-friendly characteristics that may be enhanced by investment, over time, to satisfy both the needs of the freight community and the communities in which they operate. For effective enforcement, it is essential that all traffic and law enforcement officers have details of truck route and waiting rules for their district. 3. Freight Consolidation Centers (FCCs) are a proven system for reducing freight vehicle impacts in urban centers and should be seriously considered as part of city planning. Key benefits to be gained from implementing FCCs are · Reducing truck traffic levels (reducing truck movements in the urban area through improved consolidation or modal shift); · Altering the type of truck used (e.g., fewer light or very heavy trucks); · Reducing the environmental impacts associated with truck activity (i.e., through a reduc- tion in total trips and/or greater use of environmentally friendly vehicles); · Improving the efficiency of urban freight transportation operations (through improved load factors or fewer deliveries); · Reducing the need for goods storage and logistics activities near the urban core (offering storage facilities at the FCC, as well as other value-added services); and

OCR for page 94
94 Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement · Understanding, in detail, the current methods of supply by businesses in the district and the mechanisms by which the FCC could operate (100 percent privately funded, a mixture of private/public partnership, compulsory buy-in for access to specific areas, voluntary buy-in) is of key importance to the establishment of an FCC. 4. Altering access regulations to allow out-of-hours supply can help reduce the impacts of freight vehicles on urban centers. Out-of-hours deliveries (OHDs) are best suited to large businesses operating centralized dis- tribution systems fed from a regional distribution center because such businesses can better jus- tify the additional costs in staffing the facility out of hours and can handle vehicles off the public highway. OHDs have been shown to (1) improve driver and fleet productivity, (2) reduce the environmental footprint of the logistics operation by operating vehicles more efficiently during less congested periods, and (3) reduce the wider impacts (crashes, noise, parking, etc.) of logistics operations on the local area. Existing legislation (related to noise levels and access hours) is often the major hurdle to wide- spread adoption.