Click for next page ( 41


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 40
30 REFERENCES CITED REFERENCES 1. Hida, S., et al., Assuring Bridge Safety and Serviceability 12.Bridge Deck Waterproofing Association webpage, Crow- in Europe, Report FHWA-PL-10-04, Federal Highway thorne, U.K. [Online]. Available: www.bdwa.org.uk. Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010, 56 pp. 13.Mertz, D.R., NCHRP Report 381: Report on the 1995 2. Manning, D.G., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice Scanning Review of European Bridge Structures, 4: Concrete Bridge Durability, Transportation Research National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Board, Washington, D.C., 1996, 30 pp. 1970, 28 pp. 14.Russell, H.G., NCHRP Research Results Digest 232: 3. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal-Aid Report on the 1997 Scanning Review of Asian Bridge Highway Program Manual, Vol. 6, Chapter 7, Section 2, Structures, Transportation Research Board, National Subsection 7, Concrete Bridge Decks, Transmittal 188, Research Council, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1998, 45 pp. FHWA, Washington, D.C., Apr. 5, 1976. 15.Hearn, G., et al., Bridge Preservation and Maintenance in 4. Manning, D.G., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice Europe and South Africa, Report No. FHWA-PL-05-002, 57: Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks, Transportation Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- Transportation, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2005, 150 pp. ton, D.C., 1979, 61 pp. 16.Ralls, M.L., et al., Prefabricated Bridge Elements and 5.Manning, D.G., Synthesis of Highway Practice 220: Systems in Japan and Europe, FHWA, U.S. Department Waterproofing Membranes for Concrete Bridge Decks, of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-PL-05-003, Mar. Transportation Research Board, National Research 2005, 64 pp. Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, 69 pp. 17.International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI), Guide- 6.Babaie, K. and N.M. Hawkins, NCHRP Report 297: lines for Selecting and Specifying Concrete Surface Evaluation of Bridge Deck Protective Strategies, Trans- Preparation for Sealers, Coatings, and Polymer Over- portation Research Board, National Research Council, lays, ICRI, Rosemont, Ill., 1997, 41 pp. Washington, D.C., 1987, 80 pp. 18.Sohanghpurwala, A.A., NCHRP Report 558: Manual on 7. Russell, H.G., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice Service Life of Corrosion-Damaged Reinforced Concrete 333: Concrete Bridge Deck Performance, Transportation Bridge Superstructure Elements, Transportation Research Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, D.C., 2004, 101 pp. 59 pp. 8. Kepler, J.L., D. Darwin, and C.E. Locke, Jr., Evaluation of 19.Xi, Y., N. Abu-Hejleh, A. Asiz, and A. Suwito, Perfor- Corrosion Protection Methods for Reinforced Concrete mance Evaluation of Various Corrosion Protection Sys- Highway Structures, SM Report No. 58, University of tems of Bridges in Colorado, Colorado Department of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, 2000, 222 pp. Transportation, Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-2004-1, Final Report, Jan. 2004, 141 pp. 9. American Association of State Highway and Transporta- tion Officials, (AASHTO), AASHTO LRFD Bridge Con- 20.Distlehorst, J., Cost-Effective Bridge Deck Reconstruc- struction Specifications, 3rd ed., AASHTO, Washington, tion in Kansas Using High-Density Concrete Overlays D.C., 2010. and Asphalt Overlays, Report No. FHWA KS-07-4, Kan- sas Department of Transportation Bureau of Materials 10.Ontario Provincial Standard Specification, Construction and Research, Topeka, Kans., Aug. 2009. Specification for Waterproofing Bridge Decks with Hot Applied Asphalt Membrane, OPSS 914, Ontario, Canada, 21.Wojakowski, J. and M. Hossain, "Twenty-Five-Year Per- revised Nov. 2009. formance History of Interlayer Membranes on Bridge Decks in Kansas," Transportation Research Record 1476, 11.United Kingdom Department for Transport (UKDOT), Transportation Research Board, National Research Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 2, High- Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp 180187. way Structures (Sub Structures and Special Structures), Materials, Section 3 Materials and Components Part 4, 22.Hearn, G. and Y. Xi, Service Life and Cost Comparisons BD47/99, Waterproofing and Surfacing of Concrete for Four Types of CD Bridge Decks, Report No. CDOT- Bridge Decks, UKDOT, London, 1999. 2007-2, Final Report, Colorado Department of Transpor- tation, Denver, Sep. 2007, 116 pp.