Click for next page ( 63


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 62
52 8. COSTS 18. If available, please provide the unit cost (labor, equipment, and materials) for the waterproofing membrane system only for each project during the past five years. Please list as many as possible. Respondent New or Existing Deck Unit Cost $/sq ft Alaska New 2.22 to 7.44 Alaska Existing 6.25 California New 2.50 to 9.61 California Existing 1.39 to 16.70 Connecticut -- 1.67 to 4.22 Illinois Existing 2.46 to 9.14 Kansas Existing 7.00 Michigan Existing 5.00 Missouri New 2.22 to 3.62 New Jersey Both 1.5 to 12.00 New York -- 1.49 to 11.15 Oklahoma Existing 2.18 to 3.89 Pennsylvania Existing 7.95 to 21.56 South Carolina New 9.75 to 42.80 South Dakota Existing 10.84 to 23.00 Tennessee Existing 0.56 to 1.10 Utah Both 1.50 to 10.00 Virginia Existing 3.33 Washington New 2.78 Washington Existing 1.11 to 4.22 Alberta New $C 2.51 to 6.60 Alberta Existing $C 3.25 to 8.55 New Brunswick New $C 2.14 to 3.07 New Brunswick Existing $C 2.79 Ontario Both $C 2.32 to 2.79 Prince Edward New $C 1.69 to 3.46 Island Quebec Both $C 3.72 Saskatchewan New $C 2.37 -- Information not provided. 9. PERFORMANCE 19. What defects has your agency observed in the performance of waterproofing membranes on new concrete bridge decks?