National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 98: Ridesharing as a Complement to Transit (2012)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Murray, Gail, Chase, Mark E, Kim, Eunice, McBrayer, Markie, Transportation Research Board. "Appendix B - Profiles of Participating Transit and Non-Transit Agencies ." TCRP Synthesis 98: Ridesharing as a Complement to Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
57
bottomleft bottomright
Page
57
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-4)
Survey (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-6)
Transit-Operated Vanpool Programs (7-7)
Casual Carpooling (8-8)
Economic Considerations of Ridesharing within Public Transit Agencies (9-9)
Conclusion (10-10)
Profile: King County Metro Transit in Seattle Integrates Ridesharing into Agency (11-13)
Profile: Kings County Area Public Transit Agency Vanpools Serve Farmworkers (14-14)
Ridesharing in the Planning Process (15-15)
Performance Measures of Ridesharing Success (16-16)
Profile: Des Moines Area Regional Transit Agency (DART) Captures Vanpool Miles to Maximize Revenue (17-17)
Challenges (18-18)
Profile: Metropolitan Transportation Commission Leverages Ridesharing and Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area (19-19)
Incentives (20-21)
Profile: Washington State Leads Nation in Vanpooling (22-22)
Challenges (23-24)
Incorporating Customers' Perspectives (25-26)
Technology and Social Media (27-27)
Profile: SCAT and DART Communicate through Social Media (28-28)
Profile: Dynamic Ridesharing Coming to Seattle (29-30)
Profile: BART and Cities Manage Casual Carpooling (31-31)
Profile: PRTC Supports Casual Carpooling (32-32)
Challenges (33-33)
Opportunities (34-34)
Conclusion (35-35)
References (36-37)
Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire and Results (38-56)
Appendix B - Profiles of Participating Transit and Non-Transit Agencies (57-59)
Appendix C - Transit Modes Operated by Respondents (60-60)
Appendix D - Ridesharing Placement Within Agencies (61-62)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (63-63)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 57
57 Appendix B Profiles of Participating Transit and Non-Transit Agencies

OCR for page 58
Type of Geographic Community Transit Name City/State Institution Region Service Area Characteristic Ridesharing Participants* Vehicles** AC Transit Oakland, CA Transit agency West 2 Counties Major metropolitan Unreported 913 Asotin County PTBA Clarkston, WA Transit agency Northwest Region Rural 108 Unavailable Baldwin Rural Area Robertsdale, Transit agency South County Rural Unreported Unavailable Transportation System AL Capital District Transportation Albany, NY Transit agency East Region Urbanized Unreported 318 Authority Capital Metro Transit Austin, TX Transit agency South Region Urbanized 986 1,134 Centre Area Transportation State College, Transit agency East Region Urbanized 1,300 75 Authority (CATA) PA Charlotte Area Transit System Charlotte, NC Transit agency South Region Urbanized Unreported 544 Clallam Transit System Port Angeles Transit agency Northwest County Rural Unreported Unavailable WA Connecticut Department of Newington CT DOT Northeast State Statewide Unreported N/A Transportation Denver Regional Council of Denver, CO COG West Region Regional 429 vanpoolers; 4,472 in N/A Governments carpool database; 13,552 families in Schoolpool database Des Moines Area Regional Transit Des Moines, IA Transit agency Midwest Region Urbanized 818 current van riders on 91 255 Authority vans Greater Portland Council of Portland ME COG Northeast State Statewide 9,000 commuters in statewide N/A Governments database Hillsborough (FL) Area Regional Tampa, FL Transit agency South County Urbanized Unreported 274 Transit Authority Kansas City Area Transportation Kansas City, Transit agency Midwest Region Urbanized Unreported 429 Authority MO Keep Middlesex Moving, Inc New TMA East County Regional Unreported N/A Brunswick, NJ King County Metro Transit Seattle, WA Transit agency Northwest Region Major metropolitan 2.85 million commuter van 3,024 ridership; 1,075 commuter vans in operation Kings County Area Public Transit Hanford, CA Transit agency West Region Rural Unreported 240 Agency Kitsap Transit Bremerton, WA Transit agency Northwest County Urbanized Unreported 305 Mason County Transit Shelton, WA Transit agency Northwest Places of Rural Unreported Unavailable employment Metro Transit Minneapolis, Transit agency Midwest Region Major metropolitan 30,000 in database 960 MN Metropolitan Transit Authority Houston, TX Transit agency South Region Major metropolitan 7,000 3,078 (Houston)

OCR for page 59
Metropolitan Transportation Oakland, CA MPO West Region Regional 28,000 in database of rideshare N/A Commission participants Metropolitan Washington Council Washington, COG East Region Regional 30,000 (about 19,000 are in N/A of Governments DC ridematching and 11,000 are in Guaranteed Ride Home) Nashville Metropolitan Transit Nashville, TN Transit agency South Region Urbanized Unreported 388 Authority/Regional Transportation Authority New Jersey Transit Newark, NJ Transit agency East State Major metropolitan Unreported 5,121 Orange County Transportation Orange, CA MPO West County Urbanized Unreported 1,358 Authority Pace Suburban Bus Arlington Transit agency Midwest Region Urbanized Roughly 5,000 1,774 Heights, IL Pima Association of Governments Tucson, AZ MPO Southwest County Regional 3,540 N/A Potomac and Rappahannock Woodbridge, Transit agency East County Urbanized 600 program applicants 129 Transportation Commission VA Regional Transportation Authority Nashville, TN Transit agency South Region Urbanized Unreported 57 Rhode Island Public Transit Providence, RI Transit agency Northeast State Urbanized Unreported 308 Authority (RIPTA) Salem­Keizer Transit Salem, OR Transit agency Northwest Region Urbanized Roughly 3,000 229 San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Oakland, CA Transit agency West Region Major metropolitan Unreported 669 Transit ( BART) San Joaquin Council of Stockton, CA COG West Region Regional More than 4,000 registered N/A Governments Santee Wateree Regional Sumter, SC Transit agency South Region Rural Unreported 76 Transportation Authority Space Coast Area Transit Cocoa, FL Transit agency South County Rural 119 vanpools in program 205 (Brevard County) Valley Metro/Regional Public Phoenix, AZ Transit agency Southwest County Major metropolitan Unreported 680 Transportation Authority Votran South Daytona, Transit agency South County Urbanized Unreported 161 FL Washington Metropolitan Area Washington, Transit agency East Region Major metropolitan Unreported 3,744 Transit Authority DC *As reported in survey. **2009 National Transit Database. N/A = Not applicable, non-transit agency. COG = council of governments; DOT = department of transportation; MPO = metropolitan planning organization; PTBA = Public Transportation Benefit Area; TMA = transportation management association; TMO = transportation management organization. Community Characteristic Definitions: Major metropolitan area; Urbanized: core city surrounded by suburbs; Rural: low population surrounded by open country.