National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 98: Ridesharing as a Complement to Transit (2012)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Murray, Gail, Chase, Mark E, Kim, Eunice, McBrayer, Markie, Transportation Research Board. "Organization of the Report." TCRP Synthesis 98: Ridesharing as a Complement to Transit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
6
bottomleft bottomright
Page
6
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-4)
Survey (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-6)
Transit-Operated Vanpool Programs (7-7)
Casual Carpooling (8-8)
Economic Considerations of Ridesharing within Public Transit Agencies (9-9)
Conclusion (10-10)
Profile: King County Metro Transit in Seattle Integrates Ridesharing into Agency (11-13)
Profile: Kings County Area Public Transit Agency Vanpools Serve Farmworkers (14-14)
Ridesharing in the Planning Process (15-15)
Performance Measures of Ridesharing Success (16-16)
Profile: Des Moines Area Regional Transit Agency (DART) Captures Vanpool Miles to Maximize Revenue (17-17)
Challenges (18-18)
Profile: Metropolitan Transportation Commission Leverages Ridesharing and Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area (19-19)
Incentives (20-21)
Profile: Washington State Leads Nation in Vanpooling (22-22)
Challenges (23-24)
Incorporating Customers' Perspectives (25-26)
Technology and Social Media (27-27)
Profile: SCAT and DART Communicate through Social Media (28-28)
Profile: Dynamic Ridesharing Coming to Seattle (29-30)
Profile: BART and Cities Manage Casual Carpooling (31-31)
Profile: PRTC Supports Casual Carpooling (32-32)
Challenges (33-33)
Opportunities (34-34)
Conclusion (35-35)
References (36-37)
Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire and Results (38-56)
Appendix B - Profiles of Participating Transit and Non-Transit Agencies (57-59)
Appendix C - Transit Modes Operated by Respondents (60-60)
Appendix D - Ridesharing Placement Within Agencies (61-62)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (63-63)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 6
6 · How is the agency organized for integrating ridesharing? Agency Profiles · To what extent is ridesharing included in transit service planning? Chapters three through six each contain agency profiles that · How do you coordinate/collaborate with regional plan- highlight successful or innovative approaches to integrating ning entities? ridesharing into public transit. Profiles were selected based · What are the performance measures for cost/benefit, etc? on material that emerged in the literature search or the survey. · What are your coordination successes and/or challenges? The ten profiles were primarily based on phone interviews or · How does/will technology play a role in supporting e-mail exchanges with staff at the highlighted agency. Some the integration of ridesharing and transit, through trip- information was gleaned from websites and published articles planning, social media, mobile apps, or other means? beyond the documents in the literature review. · What other strategies such as fare­media integration, marketing, loyalty programs, etc., play a role in the inte- Organization of the Report gration of transit and ridesharing? Following the Summary and this chapter one (Introduction), It is important to note that when percentages or a number the report is organized into six topical chapters: Literature of survey responses are indicated in the question-by-question Review, Ridesharing within Transit Agencies, Ridesharing analysis, this refers to the percentage of responses to that within Non-Transit Entities, Marketing and Technology, Tran- survey question, rather than to the overall survey response rate. sit Agencies and Casual Carpooling, and Conclusions. The In other words, most questions reflect the response of the report contains four appendices: the Survey Questionnaire subset of respondents who answered that question. In addition, and Results (Appendix A), Profiles of Participating Transit and all answers to the survey are self-reported answers--that is, Non-Transit Agencies (Appendix B), Transit Modes Operated respondents supplied what they believed was the most appro- by Respondents (Appendix C), and Ridesharing Placement priate answer for their program. Within Agencies (Appendix D).