Click for next page ( 16

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 15
5 CHAPTER TWO CURRENT STATE OF EVALUATION OF SITE EFFECTS ON GROUND MOTIONS INTRODUCTION SITE RESPONSE EVALUATION APPROACHES Site-specific evaluation of earthquake ground motions Three general approaches can be used to evaluate soil (i.e., includes a number of contributors such as soil stratigraphy, site) effects on ground motions: (1) the attenuation relation- basin effects, regional geology, topographic relief, and soil- ship approach, (2) the code-factor approach, and (3) the site foundation-structure interaction (SFSI). The study of basin response analysis approach. effects, regional geology, and topographic relief impacts on ground motions are primarily in the domain of engineering The attenuation relationship approach uses attenua- seismology and remains primarily in the realm of research. tion relationships or ground motion prediction equations Code-based factors (e.g., Eurocode 8; EC8 2000) have been (GMPE) that consider local site effects, including soil con- introduced to account for these effects, but site-specific evalu- ditions. While older attenuation equations distinguish only ation of these effects for highway facilities is rare and will between soil and rock, recently published Next Generation not be discussed in this study. Attempts have been made to Attenuation (NGA) relationships (e.g., Abrahamson et al. capture some of these effects on a more limited basis through 2008) can provide ground motion prediction as a function of the use of 2-D and 3-D analyses and will be briefly addressed shear wave velocity (Vs), including velocities based on ASCE in that context only. The study of SFSI effects is an area under 7-type site classes that are also adopted by IBC 2006 (Inter- rapid development, mostly by structural engineers. An over- national Code Council 2006). In this approach, a response view of these effects relevant to geotechnical engineers can spectrum is developed and can be used directly in a spectral be found in Kramer (1996) and more recently in Kramer and analysis. If needed, ground motions would have to be sepa- Stewart (2004) and is beyond the scope of this study. rately generated through some form of spectral matching, which will be discussed later. This study focuses on evaluation of local soil deposit- related site effects as illustrated in Figure 1. The presentation The second approach for assessing soil effects on is primarily focused on horizontally layered soil deposits, ground motions computes rock outcrop (surface rock) including other soil deposits and earthen structures that can response spectrum using a rock attenuation equation and be approximated as the horizontally layered soil deposits. then modifies the rock spectrum by generic soil amplifica- Both total and effective stress conditions are addressed. The tion factors such as the FPGA (used in AASHTO); Fa, and focus of this study is on practical applications relevant to Fv factors in Tables 11.4-1 and 11.4-2 of ASCE 7; or other design and analysis of highway facilities. published sources such as EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute 1993), Rodriguez-Marek et al. (2001), or Stewart et al. (2003). As in the first approach, a response spectrum is developed and can be used directly in a spectral analy- sis. If needed, ground motions can be generated separately through some form of spectral matching, which will be discussed later. The third approach calls for evaluation of local site effects by conducting a detailed site response analysis using computer software. The site response analysis approach for evaluation of site effects on ground motions is widely used (see also the survey synthesis section, chapter four). This approach is favored by Geotechnical Earthquake Engineers as it takes into account the unique geotechnical character- istic (i.e., "seismic signature") of a site. The approach uses back analysis of numerous case histories and works well FIGURE 1 Framework of site response analysis. when the profile has significant impedance contrast and