| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 233
APPENDIX
A
Background Materials
PAPERS
In the course of its study, the panel commissioned papers on a number of
topics: the prevalence and consequences of caring for elderly people; work,
stress, and well-being among black, Mexican American, and white families;
the implications of low-wage work for family well-being; an overview of
employee benefits supportive of families; a state survey of employers on
parental leave; the role of collective bargaining for work and family issues;
the role of men's participation in family-supportive policies; an interna-
tional comparison of the social welfare policy of the firm and the state; and
case studies on the implementation of flexible time and leave policies in
Sweden and Germany.
The papers listed below are available from the Women's Bureau, U.S.
Department of Labor.
Family Perspectives
Work, Stress, and Well-Being Among Black, Mexican American, and White
Families
James S. Jackson and Toni C. Antonucci
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Caring for the Elderly: Prevalence and Consequences
Sara A. McLanahan and Renee Monson
Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin
233
OCR for page 234
234
APPENDIX A
Who Needs a Family Wage? The Implications of Low-Wage Work for
Family Well-Being
Roberta M. Spalter-Roth, Heidi I. Hartmann, and Linda Andrews
Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington, D.C.
Employer and Union Initiatives
Work, Family, and Collective Bargaining
Alice H. Cook
School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University
An Overview of Employee Benefits Supportive of Families
Nancy C. Saltford
Fmnlovee Benefit Research Institute. Washington, D.C.
----I--
Ramona K. Z. Heck
Department of Consumer Economics, Cornell University
Family-Supportive Employer Policies and Men's Participation
Joseph H. Pleck
Department of Psychology, Wheaton College
Parental Leave: Issues and Findings from a Connecticut Survey of
Employers
Eileen Trczinski
Bush Center, Yale University, and Department of Consumer Economics,
Cornell University
International Comparisons
The Implementation of Flexible Time and Leave Policies: Observations from
European Employers
Ellen Galinsky
Bank Street College
The Social Policy of the Firm and the State
Martin Rein
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
OCR for page 235
BACKGROUND MATERIALS
235
EXPERTS IN RELATED AREAS
The panel met with the following experts in the course of its five meet
ings and at a 2-day workshop on March 20-21, 1989.
Emily Andrews, Research Director, Employee Benefit Research Institute,
Washington, D.C.
Helen Axel, Director, Work and Family Information Center, The
Conference Board, New York
Doug Besharov, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C.
Joanne Browne, Service Employees International Union, Washington, D.C.
May Chen, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, New York
Michael Creedon, Director of Corporate Programs, National Council
on Aging
Margaret Doolin, Governor's Office of Employee Relations, New York
State
Jeri Eckhart, Associate Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Jill Emery, Deputy Director, Women's Bureau, U.S. Department of
Labor
Lela Foreman, Communications Workers of America, Washington, D.C.
Dana Friedman, Work and Family Information Center, The Conference
Board, New York
Nancy Gordon, Assistant Director, Human Resources and Community
Development, Congressional Budget Office
Sandra Hofferth, Demographic and Behavioral Science Branch, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Karen Ignoni, Associate Director, Department of Occupational Health,
Safety and Security, AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C.
Sheila Kamerman, School of Social Work, Columbia University
Richard Kleinert, Mercer, Meidinger, Hansen, Cleveland, Ohio
Alan Kraut, Department of Personnel Research, IBM Corporation
Barbara Leonard, Director of Children's Programs, General Services
Administration, Washington, D.C.
Michelle Lord, Director, Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues
Georgina Lucas, Vice President, The Traveler's Companies, Hartford,
Connecticut
Janet Norwood, Director, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of
Labor
Harriett Presser, Department of Sociology, University of Maryland
Rhona Rapaport, Institute of Family and Environmental Research, London
Peter Reinecke, Research Director, Subcommittee on Health and
Long-Term Care, Committee on Aging, U.S. Congress
Fran Rodgers, Co-president, Work/Family Directions, Watertown,
Massachusetts
OCR for page 236
236
Ann Rosewater, Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families,
U.S. Congress
Christine Russell, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Isabel Sawhill, The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.
Howard Shafer, Vice President, Public Employees Federation, New
York State
Margaret Simms, Joint Center for Political Studies, Washington, D.C.
Joy Simonsen, Employment and Housing Subcommittee, House Govern-
ment Operations Committee, U.S. Congress
Frank Swain, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, U.S. Small Business
Administration
Robyn Stone, Research Fellow, National Center for Health Services
Research
Virginia Thomas, Manager, Employee Relations, U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, Washington, D.C.
Martha Zaslow, Research Associate, Panel on Child Care Policy,
Committee on Child Development Research and Public Policy,
National Research Council
APPENDIX A
Representative terms from entire chapter:
benefits supportive