The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 67
in three areas: (1) greenhouse gases and climate change; (2) use
of climate information in assisting sustainable social and economic
development; and (3) priorities for enhanced research and
observational systems. The ministerial declaration essentially
recognized greenhouse warming to be an international problem and
urged further elaboration and assessment of response
strategies.
A large number of deliberations are under way concerning
international negotiations on greenhouse issues. Recent experiences
with the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone
Layer and its subsequent elaboration in the London Protocol and
with the earlier Law of the Sea provide guidance about what
approaches are useful and what to avoid. It is expected, however,
that negotiations about limiting greenhouse warming will be more
difficult than their predecessors in the environmental area.
Future International Agreements
There is a growing momentum in the international community for
completion of an international agreement on climate change in time
for signing at the 1992 U.N. World Conference on Environment and
Development. The first meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group of
Government Representatives to Prepare for Negotiations on a
Framework Convention on Climate Change was held in February 1991.
The panel believes that the United States should fully participate
in this process.
Identification of priority actions should take full account of
their potential to reduce or offset greenhouse gas emissions and
their costs of implementation. Further, the panel believes that
international arrangements should allow nations to receive credit
for actions taken to reduce or offset emissions in other countries.
In other words, under such an arrangement countries like the United
States could negotiate interventions in other countries if these
proved more cost-effective than domestic actions.
Other Actions
The importance of multilateral international agreements should
not obscure the value of unilateral or bilateral action. The United
States should not only adjust its own policies, but also pursue
bilateral agreements and technical assistance programs that promote
reforestation, protection of biodiversity, and greater energy
efficiency.
In framing actions to respond to greenhouse warming, the United
States should consider cooperative programs in other countries that
might be more cost-effective than domestic options.