The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Page 69
panel reflect additional analysis, deliberation, and judgment
beyond those of the other panels contributing to this study.
Policy Considerations
The phenomenon of greenhouse warming is complex, and so are the
possible responses to it. First, the extent, timing, and variation
of future warming and its likely impacts need to be assessed.
Second, both the cost and the effectiveness of options to slow
greenhouse warming must be estimated and compared to the costs of
postponing action. Third, the possible advantages and disadvantages
of these actions need to be evaluated in light of the extent to
which people, plants, and animals are likely to adjust by
themselves or with assistance to changes in the climate. Fourth,
the policymaker needs to evaluate these actions in comparison to
other ways resources might be used. Before acting, we need to be
confident that expenditures to slow climate change make sense.
Fifth, decision makers will judge all these factors in a broader
context. Responses to greenhouse warming will be determined by
people worried about economic growth, food supply, energy
availability, national security, and a host of other problems. Many
responses appear to produce sizable benefits with regard to other
goals, such as reducing air pollution. This study makes no attempt
to assess these additional dividends. Instead, it focuses on
response to greenhouse warming as such.
Capacities of Industrialized and
Developing Countries
Different countries have quite different capacities to respond
to change. Poverty, in particular, makes people vulnerable to
change and substantially reduces their flexibility in responding to
change. Countries with low percapita income face difficult
trade-offs between stimulating economic development and alleviating
environmental problems. These countries, which already have
difficulty coping with environmental stresses today, will be even
more sorely pressed when confronted by climate change.
This report examines response to greenhouse warming in the
United States, a country richly endowed with natural and human
resources, and one benefiting from a geography that encompasses
many climate zones. Compared to many other countries, the United
States is well situated to respond to greenhouse warming.
This panel does not attempt to view greenhouse warming from the
perspective of a country less well endowed. Of course, greenhouse
warming is a global phenomenon, and many global aspects must be
included in any analysis. Nevertheless, most of the data utilized
in this study to evaluate